![]() | Status and Curiosity - On the Origins of Oil Addiction | The Oil Drum | What is happening with oil prices ? | ![]() |
![]() | The Fantasy World of the UK Government | The Oil Drum: Europe | Has Fossil Fuel Consumption Within the EU Peaked? | ![]() |
181 comments on Why oil costs over $140 per barrel: the failure of leadership
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
181 comments on Why oil costs over $140 per barrel: the failure of leadership
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
- www.SamassaVeneessä.info Finnish peak oil site
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
And a few more charts
G7 natural gas consumption ticked up in 2007, perhaps reflecting a relatively cold N hemisphere winter. It also indicates greater elasticity of supply for gas than oil. Gas production has not yet peaked and expansion of LNG provides that elasticity. This will not last much longer.
G7 coal consumption continues to rise demonstrating the political imperative of providing heat and power above concerns for CO2 emissions.
The US consumes more fossil fuel than the combined remainder of G7. There are definite signs that fossil fuel consumption in the G7 is flattening out, the decline in oil consumption being compensated by rising gas and coal. I think it is fair to say that all of this flattening is caused by high price leading to conservation and demand destruction. The total failure of climate orientated energy policy is amply demonstrated by these data.
Oil makes up almost half of G7 fossil fuel consumption. As global oil exports continue to fall so it is highly likely that G7 oil imports and consumption will fall. The question is for how long can rising coal and gas compensate for declining oil?
On the subject of natural gas, when are we likely to experience winter shortages? This year? Next?
That will likely be weather dependent. First hard winter we get in W Europe and Russia I'd guess we are in deep trouble. Failing that, we will likely continue to scrape through winter with Norwegian gas and LNG until about 2015 - if we can afford some how to pay for it.
Euan,
I am not convinced that we will get the Norwegian gas supplies we need. About 3-4 months ago someone either from the Norwegian govt, or one of the oil/gas companies, announced that they could no longer guarantee gas exports to the UK since continental Europe was their top priority. A source told me that what it boils down to is the Norwegians have contracted all their available gas to continental Europe, and if the Europeans take all the gas available under contract there will be little or none left for the UK. Unfortunately I cannot find the original article in the media, I think it must have been from one of the several newsletters I get. And nothing comes up on Google now. But you have to wonder why this was not on the front page of every British newspaper?
On the other hand, ExxonMobil/Qatar have said that they are ready to send 15 million tonnes per annum of LNG to the UK, starting I believe some time this year. This is just over 20 bcm/year natural gas, so could make up for any Norwegian shortfall. I don't know of anyone who has actually seen or is aware of the contractual details, but my guess is that the UK will be offered delivery first, as long as they are willing to pay more than anyone else. Given that Japan in particular has been paying over $20 per million btu for LNG over the last winter, it means that UK gas prices will have to rise quite a bit more than 40% to guarantee delivery. Doubling would be more like it, especially if the USA gets desperate for supplies this autumn/winter, which is looking increasingly likely. My best guess is that we will get some of the 15 M tonnes, but not all of it.
Our new (rented) flat incidentally has a useable fire place in the lounge, a feature I think is about to become very important in the UK. We will be well stocked up with smokeless coal this winter, and candles. I think the gas central heating system will not work when there is no electricity.
Hello Doug
below is a link to an article in the Guardian form 20. April 2008 about said subject;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/apr/20/oil.householdbills
The company Gassco does not sell gas, but operates all Norwegian transport systems and receiving facilities.
Our middle case has net oil exports from Norway and Russia approaching zero in the 2025 time frame.
Hmm, well far be it from me to point up, but the pipelines exporting gas towards europe could easily suffer 'an accident' if the gas going towards the UK weren't maintained.
Thus Gassco might find their priorities rearranged, like it or not, that is a possibility.
Normally the operator of a LNG plant will try to run it at a year around optimum, which could be 90 % of nameplate capacity. This would for 20 Bcm/a turn into 1,5 - 1,8 Bcm/month or 50 - 60 Mcm/d as a continuos flow.
This is the difficult part with LNG, it is hard to adjust the process to the seasonal swings in demand.
Another way to do this is to let LNG constitute part of the base load and then let the domestic gas fields handle the huge swings in seasonal and daily demands. I don’t know if this is happening?
In a world of logic, the LNG in-port would be owned by UK gov plc and would be the supplier of last resort for domestic/essential methane only. Presumably the liquified product can be stored, at high energy density, 'indefinitely' as required, with evaporation pressure vented into the gas grid. Makes a lot more sense than pressurising room temp gas elsewhere.
[OK, on second thoughts, I have lost confidence in any gov management ability..]
They can't get more storage facilities for Natural gas through the planning system - so are totally exposed to a cold snap in the winter.
We now have a yahoo group for UK TOD'ers - 10 members at the moment- if anyone else wants to be on the list to check out comments please e-mail me from my profile - unless you choose it no mail will be delivered to your personal e-mail box, but it should be handy for specific discussion of UK issues where there is not an appropriate thread on TOD, and any suggested measures.
Cheers.
Dave
Any update on following from Guardian June 11 ...?
best, PhilH
That's interesting, but they still need to source gas in summer for storage for use in winter.
I don't know how that application is progressing, but here is an overview of the lack of storage in the UK:
http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/06/11/afx5104269.html
If nat gas was to be sold on parity with oil (using an oil price of US$144/bbl) based on energy content it would cost US$24 MMBtu or approximately 120 p/therm at the trading point or the beach.
Nat gas contracts (futures) for December 2008 in UK recently obtained 108,96 p/therm.
OPTIMIST!!
In addition to Peak Oil, the world is also faced with changes in climate due to the increase in CO2 and other GHG which result. Last summer's exceptional melt of sea-ice over the Arctic Ocean also resulted in an outpouring of sea-ice and fresher waters from the Arctic into the Greenland Sea and this flow continued into the Labrador Sea. One result of this process might be a reduction in the Thermohaline Circulation (aka: THC), which could bring colder weather to Europe in winter.
As I have watched the sea-ice cycle in satellite data over the years, I noticed that this year, the Odden Ice Tongue did not form in the stream of sea-ice to the east of Greenland. This feature has been associated with THC sinking in the Greenland Sea, thus it's reasonable to conclude that the THC may not have happened in that location this year. The impact of this flow on the Labrador Sea could also be significant. Recall the European experience after "the Great Salinity Anomaly" of the 1970's. One can't be sure without making proper measurements of conditions in the ocean, but I wouldn't be surprised if Europe experiences colder weather next few winters...
E. Swanson
Euan I don't know how much of the refining capacity of England is complex with its higher NG usage or much about it at all. But even within normal limits if England suffers a shortage of NG I'm pretty sure it will be crippling for its refineries. Probably forcing them to shut down. This would be for both direct use of NG and for indirect uses such as electricity. Refineries are pretty sensitive to problems in the network if you will.
Not only would this cause problems with petrol delievers in the UK but worse since I'm and American shortage of gasoline exports to the US in fact the UK would become a net importer until it solved its NG problem.
Given this would be happening at the same time US NG demand is high and US refineries would be having there own problems getting NG and probably likely to try and get unseasonaly high imports would face a bit of a double whammy.
Yet again it seems the secondary effects of peak oil will means we probably won't make it far down these nice pretty post peak curves.
To answer my own question, this is from Reuters today:
"Europe faces fresh New Year Russian gas crisis"
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKHKG1655620080708?pageNumber=3&v...
UK gas bills are already projected to rise by 40% later this year; electricity by 30%. Such rises, affecting every household, will in turn lead to further reductions in discretionary spending.
Unemployment, already rising, will see a sharper uptrend as businesses who hoped (believed the MSM?) that energy price hikes will be temporary have been reportedly holding off workforce reduction programs. The worsening credit and household spending situations will shortly force their hand. Already this past week housebuilders have been shedding labour in a big way; Barratt for example is laying off 1000 after their share price fell 96% in just 12 months. Taylor Wimpey is also laying off after failing to secure £500bn of 'emergency funding'.
GB doubtless already regrets not calling the 'snap election' a few months ago - he's going to regret it more this next winter.
Consider UK oil situation against the latest official Norwegian Petroleum production estimate:
That is the most optimistic scenario :)
As for natural gas from Norway, the only thing I can find that is current and official is the Wood Mackenzie assessment from July 2008 for Norway's Ministry of Petroleum.
However, I have hard time deciphering this graph. The accompanying text reads:
I know Euan, Campbell and others have already assessed the more realistic scenarios, but it would be interesting to find what the official Norwegian models predict.
Even against these types of optimistic data sets, the leadership is indeed lacking.
Is it just the classic case of Cassandra not being a good role model for a politician?
Hello,
The charts (charts 9 and 10) you refer to was developed by Wood Mackenzie.
There is something that does not add up with regard to the scaling, the shape of the production profiles looks to be in line with other forecasts though there may be some deviations on actual numbers.
The best thing would to have available resourcedriven forecasts based upon latest available NPD data.
Thanks, I had an uneasy feeling about the levels as well, which is why I asked. I can't find more recent NPD data on natgas forecasts.
HELLO,
The diagrams below is lifted out of the Norwegian Ministry of Oil and Energy (MOE)Factsheets for 2008.
The diagram below shows total petroleum production from NCS
The other shows historical and forecast nat gas production from NCS.
Now compare the shapes of WOODMAC and MOE forecasts.
Thanks!
So the greeny blue colour is discovered developed declining at what is likely a too optimistic rate that already has enhanced oil recovery (EOR) embedded in it. But then the orange is more oil to be produced via EOR reducing the already too low decline rate even more. The green is discovered undeveloped - maybe possible maybe not, I thought virtually all the big oil and gas fields were now "on". And the red is yet to find.
So in summary this is fantasy land. Norway needs to understand the harm that may be done to W European clients for nat gas by promising more than may be delivered.
Time you did a hatchet job Rune on your fellow countrymen.
€
€;
Sorry I should have translated the legend and the diagram you refer to is total Norwegian petroleum production as forecast by NPD;
The greeney blue color; fields in production or sanctioned for production (proven)
Orange color; possible increases from EOR (Possible)
Light green; Discoveries considered for development (Possible), some of this will become economical when oil prices hit US$1 000/bbl
Red color; Yet to find
The attached figure (at the bottom) shows actual NCS production against a prediction with Hubbert's based upon actual NPS production data as of 1999. THIS IS FOR CRUDE OIL (C only).
Then is the annual 5 year production forecasts as of 2006 - 2008 from NPD shown and lastly yours truly forecast based upon a field by field forecast (as of 2007).
Note that NPD revised down their forecast with 20 % (or 0,5 Mb/d) from 2006 to 2008.
My forecast LIKVERN 1 towards 2012 is still below Hubbert's and I have been 2-3 % within actual figures in my forecasts through the recent years. Note the difference between LIKVERN 1 and the most recent from NPD, it is close to 0,8 Mb/d by 2012, and it is not my field by field resource driven forecast that EIA or IEA use in their models.
I may come back later with my resource driven forecast for nat gas from NCS,.... but don't expect any good news.
I may (as part of writing a post about future Norwegian petroelum production with the preliminary working title "Lies, damned lies and governmental forecasts" the Norwegian story.
€, are you still optimistic? You want me to tell you more or.......do you prefer water boarding? ;-)
Nice chart Rune - I think we need to have a campaign on NPD forecasts.
We can maybe use the discussion session at Sparks and Flames to flesh out the vital realities of the future of Norwegian oil and Gas production - these parallel shifting forecasts look like sh*t to me.
I presume official representatives from Norway will be present and will want to ask questions.
Should be blame the government or blame ourselves? No one held a gun to our heads to buy that SUV, use plastic water bottles, buy products from overseas, etc.