![]() | DrumBeat: July 10, 2008 | The Oil Drum | Asking one of the less comfortable questions about our energy future... | ![]() |
![]() | Why oil costs over $140 per barrel: the failure of leadership | The Oil Drum: Europe | The post-oil energy economies of the future - by Gordon Brown | ![]() |
136 comments on Has Fossil Fuel Consumption Within the EU Peaked?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
136 comments on Has Fossil Fuel Consumption Within the EU Peaked?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
- www.SamassaVeneessä.info Finnish peak oil site
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
It would be interesting to see a similar graph for Asia, I have a feeling they are even less self-sufficient than the EU.
Robert
Give me some time and i will revert later today with a similar graph for Asia.
OK?
Hello,
Below is a graph comparing degree of self-sufficiency for EU, USA and Asia and Pacific as of 2007 based upon data from BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2008.
What may come as a surprise is the high degree of self-sufficiency of natural gas of 87 % within AP (AP; Asia Pacific). The reason for this is that AP only had 15 % of global natural gas consumption in 2007. NG consumption grows strongly in AP and AP will become a strong competitor with EU and USA for NG, inclusive LNG.
BusinessWeek recently had a headline of:
Kazakhstan: Work begins on gas pipeline to China
which clearly demonstrates China willingness to increase nat gas consumption, even from areas thought to be the source of future EU supplies.
With respect to coal China produced approximately 70 % of AP coal consumption in 2007, and China was also the world’s biggest coal consumer in 2007, consuming approximately twice of the second largest consumer, USA.
Rune
Hi Rune,
Thank you for the interesting graphs. Because of NAFTA, wouldn't it be more appropriate to compare North America (Canada, Mexico, US) to the EU and Asia? And to include uranium? I think that the contrast with Asia and the EU will become stronger with these changes.
Dave
If we compared NAFTA (or North America, Canada, Mexico and USA) to EU you are right about the degree of self-sufficiency for North America would improve.
There are several comparisons that is interesting like;
G-7 versus the BRIC countries (this is an interesting one because presently BRIC is a net exporter of all FF)
Eurasia (Europa and Russia with some of the FSUs) versus North America
What I expect is that new alliances is and/or will form in the near future and I will not be surprised if many of these were forged around energy supplies.
The total bars look wrong: AP is less self-sufficient for both oil and coal, and yet the total suggests that AP is more self-sufficient overall.
Nick,
Thank you for your observation.
I have been running through the calculatios from scratch again, and they come out with the same results as presented in the above graph.
The reason has to do with the composition of the energy mixture for the regions and the total is weighted numbers.
USA is slightly heavier on nat gas than coal while AP countries are very heavy on coal and very light on nat gas. AP as a region has presently a high degree of self sufficiency on coal combined with a high total usage of coal (53 % of total FF usage as of 2007).
USA coal represented 27 % of total FF usage in USA in 2007, while it was a small net exporter of coal.
It should come as some food for thought that AP presently have such a high degree of self sufficiency on FF.
Did this help to explain the seemingly distortion in the graph?
Yes, that seems to make sense.
Thanks.