![]() | DrumBeat: July 13, 2008 | The Oil Drum | Peak Oil Media: Matt Simmons gets more pessimistic on CNBC, Heinberg, and others... | ![]() |
107 comments on Peak Oil Media Guide
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
107 comments on Peak Oil Media Guide
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.”
—George Carlin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Understanding net energy is important to understanding Peak Oil. The main reason we pump oil is to burn it for energy. As we substitute lower EROEI oil for depleting higher EROEI oil, the amount of energy available decreases even if production stays constant. This can happen on the production side (i.e. deep water oil has a much lower EROEI than East Texas fields had). It can also happen during refining (i.e. coking heavy oil is more energy intensive than fractional distillation).
It is insufficient to focus on raw production numbers, because raw production doesn't capture any of this. If production is flat and EROEI is declining, then net energy is declining and prices will go up.
In addition net exports is an important part of the picture, at least for countries that import oil. IMO, the combination of the two -- declining EROEI coupled with declining net exports -- is why oil prices have risen so far, even as the G7 economies slip into recession.
Declining EROEI is nearly impossible to quantify, however. It also involves more than oil, e.g. natural gas is a significant input into both Canadian tar sands and ethanol. But I think the effect is real. We are feeling it. It is going to get progressively worse. And it is nearly entirely below the radar. I don't know how to make the case in more than arm-wavy sorts of ways.
In my public speaking on peak oil, I have found that explaining EROEI complicates matters and actually is not necessary for people to understand the problem and that we have to move urgently. It is an important element, absolutely, but not necessary to achieve those two goals (we have a problem and it's urgent).
I would keep a discussion of EROEI out to keep the document brief and to keep people focussed on the core issues. Sending the thought process sideways with that extra wrinkle will hurt the cohesiveness of the document, not help it.
Great job, Chris.