![]() | Algeria & Morocco: Natural Gas Cartels, Fertilizer Mercantilism, and Rising Tensions | The Oil Drum | The post-oil energy economies of the future - by Gordon Brown | ![]() |
276 comments on DrumBeat: July 15, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
276 comments on DrumBeat: July 15, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Pessimism of the Intellect; Optimism of the Will.”
—Antonio Gramsci
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
OPEC’s Monthly OIL Market Report (large PDF) is out this morning. Crude production for June was 32,290 kb/d, up 124 kb/d from May but that was after May production was revised downward by 28 kb/d.
Big changes were Saudi Arabia, up 171 kb/d and Kuwait up 23 kb/d. Downs were Iraq down 36 kb/d and Venezuela down 54 kb/d. All other changes were smaller. Nigeria was unchanged.
Saudi 2008 production looks like this, in thousand barrels per day:
Jan. 9,075
Feb. 9,090
Mar. 9,031
Apr. 8,984
May. 9,179
Jun. 9,350
All other OPEC nations seem to be holding their own, either up or down only slightly. Venezuela, who produced 2,720 kb/d as late as March 2005 is now down over 400 kb/d since that date. Indonesia is also in long term decline though their production has been relatively flat for about 15 months.
Ron Patterson
Hi Ron,
Just wondering is that a normal variance in monthly production figures for the Saudis or are the figures hiding something unusual?
Tremain, yes such variation is pretty well normal for Saudi. I think they are pumping as much as they possibly can so their production figures reflects new oil here and declines there. According to Wikipedia Oil Megaprojects Saudi is supposed to have 908 kb/d of new oil coming on line in 2008. I think that is an exaggeration however no doubt they will bring, and have already brought, some new oil on line this year. Remember most of this new oil will simply replace declines elsewhere.
That is the real story. In fact, that is the story all over the world.
Ron Patterson
Rounding off, this is a first half average of 9.1 mbpd. If they were to match their 2005 annual rate of 9.6 mbpd, they would have to average 10.1 mbpd in the second half of the year. In other words, it seems likely that Saudi Arabia will show three straight years of crude oil production below their 2005 rate.
Meanwhile, on a total liquids basis, their consumption in 2008 will probably be up by about 500,000 bpd over their 2005 rate. So, I estimate that if they wanted, in 2008, to simply match their 2005 annual net export rate, they would have to average about 12.6 mbpd, total liquids, in the second half of the year--versus their 2005 annual rate of 11.1 mbpd.
From the Saudi announcement linked above:
I would assert that the "market needs it" in perpetuity, which renders such a production rate NON "sustainable." Do these people even bother to read or think through their announcements?
Where "the market needs" are defined by Saudi Arabia, after having looked at what they can actually produce.
It was only a few months ago that they were saying "there is no call for more oil" - right up until they got a new field working, when production jumped. Reality is mutable to Aramco.
on the other hand, 500kbpd means that roughly 70 milion dollars a day will stay in developped countries, instead of going to saudi arabia.
that's a lot of money. maybe some of that money will go into renewable energy
"that's a lot of money. maybe some of that money will go into renewable energy'
Now if Joe SixPack would only think of that while walking to work tomorrow, since there isn't enough mass transit to go around.
i must say, the reinvestment part hit me like a brick when reading the article about pakistan turning "green", mostly by needing it.
let joe sixpack freeze a winter, and he'll start digging into solar power / electric heaters / wood burning. he'll also start noticing the latest and greatest architectural wonders: bus stations
necessity is the best teacher, afterall.
In my neck of the woods, bus ridership has doubled in the last few months. I found that out talking to a bus driver who said: "I can't afford to drive anymore."
Here's the OPEC production table extracted from the report
And here's the world production according to OPEC.
Memmel, if you read this, can you suggest what you believe the real production figures to be based on your analysis?
Here's the statement from the report supporting the news item in yesterday's drumbeat. Yesterday's MEES report said demand would fall 500k/day but the actual published OPEC report is even worse and says 710k/day (although the difference between 32.0 and 31.2 is 800k so I presume there's some rounding going on)
Thanks Undertow, got a link for that?
It's at the bottom of page 3 (physically numbered page 1) of the OPEC PDF you posted, with further details on page 7 (numbered page 3)
http://www.opec.org/home/Monthly%20Oil%20Market%20Reports/2008/pdf/MR072...
The important thing to look at is how oil is moving month to month what you see is that the surge months seem to always be lead by decline months and more importantly any increases seem to be temporary i.e less than sixty days followed by a slow down. And as noted overall production with a running average is lower.
My conclusion is that changes in production reported are actually changes in storage levels in the producing counties real production is probably pretty much flat out.
Understand that before this year seasonal demand fluctuations resulted in demand still dropping below production capacity in the spring and fall. Starting last fall the seasonally caused spare capacity seems to have evaporated.
I do get a tanker tracker report and from it it seems that exports have been pretty much flat but with ships taking turns sailing east then west. So you have a number of temporary storage shell games in progress.
1.) Production is pretty much flat out but.
1.) For two months send excess to storage and claim higher production numbers.
2.) For two months claim even higher production numbers as storage is drained.
3.) Send extra oil east for a few months refilling storage in asia
4.) Send extra oil west for a few months refilling the EU/US ( lower imports to Asia )
However overall this year your seeing a persistent storage drain.
To me at least its really hard to split out the lower production from export land however I believe that lower production is playing a big role because fungible side products of refineries like bunker fuel are in short supply globally. Part of this of course is a move to complex refining but even with that if KSA was refining the oil you would expect them to be taking a larger role in the Bunker fuel market.
But we have no sing of excess production from Export Land refineries this is not definitive because they could be burning residuals for electric generation. But bottom line is we seem to have both production and export land problems even though splitting the two is very difficult.
So it looks like we probably have a combination of a slow decline in production of good grades of crude and export land.
Finally I mention good grades because it looks like some heavy sour crudes are not being purchased so some spare capacity exists for those and this is also contributing to changes in the numbers as these are discounted enough to sell. This is my heavy-sour/ NG problem.
Every thing seems to be on various 2 month like time tables so you have sort of a natural 4-6 month cycle with real inventories lower if smoothed over say 3 months and production lower. Whats critical is that you have no signs of any sustained production increase and plenty of indications that storage is being manipulated world wide to stave of shortages.
My best guess is we are down about 2mbpd in production from the real peak in 2005 with the recent reported peaks a figment of OPEC's imagination they don't even show in the ship tracking. I think export land has us down on top of this at least 1mbpd for a net decline from a 2005 peak in exports of about 3mbd. This is sufficient to initiate real post peak problems I have that at 4mbd down from real peak and we are if you look around rapidly approaching post peak like symptoms. Also 3mbd fits very well with the current price levels and storage levels.
My best guess is that by this winter serious shortages will develop somewhere in the 2nd/1st world that cannot be papered over by this shell game.
The increase in complex refining capacity and even using cokers on the residuals from light sweet refining is probably all that has kept up running this year and its taken its toll on NG prices. Given that the biggest oil users now pretty much all have complex refining I don't expect significant gains from more complex refining to help in fact we have excess refining capacity this year. Next of course the death of the housing industry in the US and world wide will act as a fairly big demand drop thats helping and will continue to help some even into next year. Thus the only good news as the continued popping of the global housing bubble is reducing demand to some extent. This is at least temporarily lessing the impact of what I believe is a real decline of 3mbd and of course initial conservation efforts are playing a role.
Thus it seems the first big peak oi/export land event besides rising prices will probably be a fuel shortage esp diesel in the southern hemisphere as they enter their growing season and summer.
Our diesel shortage should become acute and demand for heating oil and diesel for planting in the south clash. And a chance for a silent spring in the Northern Hemisphere as the sound of diesel trucks and farm tractors does not fill the air.
Thanks. I have to say your "best guess" seems to fit in with the oil price a lot better than OPEC's figures. If you believe OPEC, recent prices seem almost directly proportional to production (rather than the inverse).
Thanks the fact that misinformation seems to be happening is itself a important piece of information.
The evidence points to OPEC being unable to make any serious sustained production increases
and more importantly they are lying about it.
"I do get a tanker tracker report..."
just curious, about how much crude is in transit at any time ?
A lot :)
Seriously though shipping is a big part of the storage of oil.
You don't need the tanker report for this say 40 mbd is shipped then at any one time say on average 2 weeks of oil are at sea so 120mb or so are in transit on the ocean at any given point in time. Or about a 5 weeks of usage by the US.
Take a look at this image from New Scientist (June 2008):
Click for a larger version