I like using the "Marshall Plan" name for the reasons cited. But regardless of what one calls it, we need to get started, and so far all I see being produced are words..

Video here:
http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_...

There is a Q&A session with the governors after the talk.

How does an ant eat an elephant? Small bites, lots of friends. The Marshall Plan was more of a framework than a Plan. It is similar to the commercial framework that allowed retooling the communications since the 1984 de-monopolization of AT&T.

This graphic is intended to indicate the difference between Planning and a framework of Standards. Planning seeks consistency in HOW to do things. Standards incrementally push the state of the art in WHAT to do.

Government Planned our transportation and power generation infrastructures. We have better cars than Henry Ford, but we have not incremented beyond moving a ton to move a person.

Computer data storage and communication infrastructures are managed by Standards. In fits and leap, data storage has progressed from floppies, to HD floppies, Zip, hard drives, CD's, DVD's, etc..., a plethora of storage devices in a rich ecology that optimizes many niches.