194 comments on A Compromise on the Drilling Question
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
194 comments on A Compromise on the Drilling Question
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them.”
—Henry Ford
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Oh, I am sure those areas will get drilled and I am sure that people like KSA will not willingly supply the USA with the oil it needs for long term BAU growth.
Being pragmatic and proposing a middle path you are missing a critical point - oil is just one part of the total economy.
A workable pragmatic economic plan for the future must consider all the limitations, not just the problem of oil in isolation.
What you are proposing is a faith based compromise attempt at BAU high growth for as long as possible, party on, burn the oil ever more quickly 'til it's gone, the 'just-in-time-fairy' says alternates funded by this bonanza will be perfectly adequate to allow exponential economic growth forever - what lucky people our grandchildren will be.
At some stage less oil will be consumed, and if this leads to deflation (as seems possible) then since the banking system MUST have growth to function normally there will be less and less resources to invest in anything - let alone sustainable, adequate, energy alternatives - what unlucky people our grandchildren will be!
Oh, I am sure those areas will get drilled
Then you will have lost the opportunity to use that oil money at an early stage to push us down the alternative energy path.
What you are proposing is a faith based compromise attempt at BAU high growth
How so, when what I am proposing could move us away from oil? When prices may be $300 a barrel by the time the oil could flow? Do you think it will be BAU at $300?
Robert is right -- there is going to be more and more political pressure to drill in ANWR and the OCS -- better to head it off now into something constructive. I'm opposed to drilling, if it will only be used to perpetuate BAU -- and the temptation to do that will be overwhelming. If OCS or ANWR oil revenues can be earmarked for a major push into renewables, that is more palatable -- Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.) realizes that, I think that is why he is starting to change his mind about drilling in ANWR. We should have probably done exploration work in ANWR and OCS a lot earlier, if only to find out exactly how much is out there. Hubbert, in Congressional testimony in 1974, doubted that OCS oil would make much of a difference -- and that was 34 years ago, when our domestic oil production was a lot higher than it is now...