158 comments on May 2008 EIA Oil Production Record. Will it Too be Revised Downward?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
158 comments on May 2008 EIA Oil Production Record. Will it Too be Revised Downward?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Interesting. But in all honesty, Iraq has NOT been running at full capacity since Desert Storm. With the embargo no longer there they could (in theory) get back up to their full potential (of ?? 6mb/d ??).
So, while the rest of the World's production goes downward the numbers from Iraq will make it look as if oil production is still healthy.
I agree--Iraq is one of the potential bright spots going forward. Even if they can increase their production by, say 3.5 million barrels a day, this won't last very long in meeting the world's increasing demand. I have not investigated this enough to know what a reasonable estimate of this amount might be, and over what timeframe.
I think the HL method would be tricky here as production was artificially restrained for over a decade (Desert Storm-2003), and then followed by the "above ground factors" (i.e., infrastructure destruction) that continues with the insurgency. Then there're the political factors of which of the 3 geographic areas can produce what amount.
On top of that, the reserve figures have also changed over time (to who knows what).
Would make for a good Geology Master's thesis though.
I take a slightly different view of Iraq's potential impact, in the future.
On one hand, I assign a kind of chaos dynamic to future Iraq production. Which means that it's so complicated to gauge risk of US withdrawal, US presence, Iran's influence, sectarian tensions, and Israel-Iran tensions, that I throw up my hands. I'm a big believer in keeping a strong "I have no idea what will happen" in my analysis, if that's what's called for.
However, one data point on which I can rely is the fact that daily Iraqi oil production has now fully recovered to the levels we saw prior to the Iraq War. Not to the two, monthly spike-peaks we saw when clearly the government jammed production higher, in anticipation of conflict. But, in 2008 we are tracking at 2.3MB/day. So that is easily matching the 2002 average of 2.02MB/day.
So what that tells me is that the potential swing higher, from current levels, is not quite the eye-opening swing it might have been, say, from levels 1, 2, and 3 years ago, when Iraqi production slumped below 2Mb/day . As important is consideration of the long-term damage to Iraqi oil fields that took place under previous rule. I should add I have seen or received some dispute over this idea from Iraqi Petro engineers. Perhaps a middle case is appropriate here: potential for significantly increased production lies in wait, in Iraq. But the speed by which that increase would take place may very well surprise, on the downside.
I assign high risk to the advent of both an Obama or a McCain administration. Simply put, they both represent change. This will provoke anticipations, reactions, and new dynamics. I'm not optimistic. My most optimistic case for Iraq oil production is that it could be crossing above the production level of 3Mb/day in late Q3 2010--with hope for 4Mb/day in late Q3 of 2011.
G
Gregor,
Which War? I remember reading that in the late 1980s Iraq had the potential to produce 6mb/d. That was before Desert Storm, the UN embargo, and then Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Also, production had been disrupted by the Iran-Iraq War that happened even before Desert Storm.
So production around the 6mb/d may still be a possibility
... or maybe not.
Iraq oil production never reached 6 million, Iraq maximum production took place in 1980 at around 3.3 bpd, the talk about 6 million barrel a day goes as far as the days when I was a kid living in Baghdad in the mid-80s, in order for Iraq to reach this 6 million a day number, it require massive multi-billion dollar investment program, but the issue is not really about money, the issue with Iraq is about politics, the hydrocarbons law has stalled for years in the parliament, the Kurds will not sign on the law before the issue of Kirkuk is resolved, and by looking at the deadlock regarding Kirkuk local election of late, the Kirkuk issue seems far from over.
The best Iraq can do is sign the long talked about technical oil contracts (even thought those have also stalled), should Iraq sign those, Iraq oil production can increase by 0.5 million bpd, however it is also worth noting that any political stability in Iraq will also greatly enhance internal demand which has been artificially depressed for too long, as a matter of fact Iraqi oil exports already decreased from 1.99m bpd in May to 1.85m bpd in July, due to the current relative stability:
http://www.iraqdirectory.com/DisplayNewsAr.aspx?id=6653
regards,
Nawar
Thanks Nawar,
This is the most credible summary that I have seen on Iraq. Demand must have been hugely depressed by all the violence and is bound to increase in the advent of stability.
ELM in action.