The Book Club responses to the Long Emergency were surprising - nothing about Prii dotting the landscape soon as our salvation, or Plans courtesy of Pickens Or Gore. Maybe they were still reeling from the impact? Or I'm too used to people on the internet dismissing JHK for his Y2K statements or jingoism. Other people I've foisted TLE on have been quite vehement that it was all BS, though.

This was just a short summary. There were some extensive postings (I was took the JHK was mostly right position). Trey Garrison took the opposite position. And we had a debate on the local NPR station in Dallas. Here is a link to the full discussion:

http://bookclubblog.dallasnews.com/

There is a public town hall meeting at 2:00 P.M. today in Dallas:

The Points Summer Book Club may be wrapping up, but you'll have one more chance to share your thoughts. You're invited to an in-person discussion of the book and themes discussed here on the blog:

Who: Book club discussion leaders Rod Dreher, Jeffrey Brown, Trey Garrison and Larry Allums -- and you.
What: The Points Summer Book Club town hall meeting, wrapping up discussion of James Howard Kunstler's The Long Emergency

When: 2 to 3:30 p.m. Sunday

Where: The Dallas Institute for Humanities and Culture, 2719 Routh St., in Uptown Dallas between McKinney Avenue and Cedar Springs Road

I've hosted and taken part in some book and documentary discussions on issues and peak oil, global warming, genetically modified food, etc.

An interesting dynamic happens depending on the mix of people in the group. The more diverse their views on the subject the more time is spent (wasted?) with each side trying to convince the other side that their view is the correct one.

But when the group happens to all share roughly the same view on the subject then the discussion is much more productive! It usually gets deep into ways of dealing with or combatting the problem.
(Maybe when widely different views exist within the group each side sees eachother as the problem and the "combatting the problem" energy is spent on eachother?...)

I've always wanted to particiapate in a good face-to-face group discussion on peak oil and energy issues with a group that shares my views on the subject. That view being that we will eventually muddle through by adapting our culture, economy, society and habits with some rather large and difficult changes. In other words, we will deal with the problem by gradually changing to a very different cuture. It's already happening...at least in my eyes ;-)

Greg in MO

Yes, I think that's why PeakOil.com created three special forums: Doomers Only, Moderates Only, and Cornucopians Only. It just got to the point where productive discussion was impossible. Someone would try to post an idea for mitigation, and the doomers would jump all over the thread, totally derailing it. And vice-versa: someone would post about how we are so screwed, and the cornucopians would show up, posting about how silly doomers are and how the free market will fix it all. After awhile, no matter how interested you are in the topic, covering the same ground over and over again gets tedious. The special forums were supposed to offer a place to get beyond that.

People hear what they want to believe.

All of our efforts here just work on the fringes of our individual existing mindsets. It takes a great deal of time and reinforcement to change peoples worldview by even 20-30%. Then spend a weekend with a charismatic cornucopian and it'll set you back 3 months...;-)

It's a good thing to have an open mind.... just make sure it's not open at both ends.

Yes, I think that's why PeakOil.com created three special forums: Doomers Only, Moderates Only, and Cornucopians Only. [...] After awhile, no matter how interested you are in the topic, covering the same ground over and over again gets tedious. The special forums were supposed to offer a place to get beyond that.

I don't frequent their forums, but don't they run into the problem we have in all political affairs, that almost everyone thinks they're "middle of the road"?

Not really. People seem pretty aware of where they are on the "Doomatron scale." And there are mods who will move or delete posts as necessary.

Leanan,
I was just looking at the PeakOil.com discussion boards and see lots of interesting topics, but absolutely no seperation by Doomer-Moderate-Cornucopian. Am I really missing something? Are the terms used there different? Do you perhaps see different discussion baords when you sign up and declare yourself in one group or another? Help!

I have admin privileges there, so I'm not sure how it works for ordinary users. But you cannot see the special forums unless you register and log in. They are invisible to guests.

Once you are registered and logged in, I think you have to sign up somehow to get into the special forums. But you don't have to pick only one. You can enroll in Doomers Only, Moderates Only, and Cornucopians Only if you wish.

There's not a lot going on right now. Like TOD, PO.com has seen traffic severely slow with the drop in oil prices. And Doomers Only is by far the most active forum.

I'm a member and logged in, and I don't see these forums.

This is supposedly how you sign up:

Hit the "Usergroups" link to the right of the "Search" link at the top of the forum, then choose the group from the drop-down menu.

Here was my central theme:

Are you better off than you were four years ago, and what about four years from now?

I have previously described the position taken by Kunstler, et al, in the 2004 video, "End of Suburbia: Oil Depletion & the Collapse of the American Dream" (available on Netflix). The parties that were interviewed specifically warned about collapsing suburban housing values and rapidly rising food & energy prices.

I have also previously described the position taken by Daniel Yergin in 2004--that oil prices in late 2005 would be back down to a long term price of $38 per barrel, as rising oil production forced prices down. In June, 2007, he predicted that oil prices in 2008 would be back down to $60.

Time Magazine, in last week's issue, had a chart showing the year over year change in housing prices for the top 20 markets (Case-Shiller monthly index). The index has gone from up over 15% year over year in 2005 to down more than 15% year over year currently. Now, while I concede that the primary driver behind the mortgage meltdown was the huge buildup in debt, I believe that rapidly rising energy--and thus food--prices have acted as a trigger, and as an accelerant, for the mortgage meltdown.

Regarding food & energy prices, just compare what we are currently spending to what we were spending in 2004.

So, looking forward to 2012, who are you going to believe--Kunstler, who was correct about his predictions regarding suburban housing values and food & energy prices--or Daniel Yergin, who has been dead wrong?