A bold idea, though only partially achievable.
The HVDC line length is comparable to the Pacific Intertie which connects southern California with the Bonneville Power Administration.
There will be a requirement for redundancy in route of the HVDC lines. Incidents such as bushfires underneath the power lines from the Snowy scheme caused blackouts in Melbourne several years ago. No sane energy regulator would allow a dependency on one power line for an entire state. So multiple routes with multiple costs for redundancy and reliability will be needed. These can link up with otherwise isolated grids, such as Esperance or Olympic Dam.

The linkage to the north west integrated system (NWIS) in the Pilbara would also have to contend with cyclones. The Horizon power reliability report of 2006 shows that power losses of 20-100hrs do occur after cyclones. The impact on mining operations, not to mention households, of interruptions of this length are severe and would require additional local generation to offset. In the north west, this would be open cycle gas turbines which are already in use in mine sites, with low costs due to close proximity to gas suppliers. So why build a power line when the load will be met locally.

Given there are existing wind farms in all the air regions mentioned in the proposal, would it be possible to perform a statistical analysis of the independence of these air regions. Taking a years worth of hourly power generation numbers and crunching them to determine how reliable a network of dispersed wind farms can be in the real world would boost your case. Statistical proof that the wind will be blowing somewhere all the time would take the wind out of detractors sails.
There are superb wind farm sites in the south west of WA, with 45%+ capacity factors in real life wind farms. The problem is that there isn't the ability to adsorb the power variations in the grid. The HVDC link across the Nullabour would allow these resources to be exploited fully.

So in conclusion, the Nullabour link to enable increased wind penetration and increased pumped storage capacity makes sense. The northwest link makes much less sense and could be delayed to a second phase of the plan.

Yours,

Lachlan the Accountant.

Lachlan,
Thanks for your link to the Pacific intertie. I was not familiar with this but when living in Manitoba Canada in 1980's a very long HVDC( I think 1million volts) was built, connecting Nelson Rivers hydro sites to N Dakota.
All of the proposed lines go through desert or low scrub, which is easy to maintain fire-breaks and is of little hazard. No major fault lines.
It is beyond my expertise to model correlations between wind sites, but note that in UK its about R2=0.2. Australia's weather systems usually go West to East and take 2-6 days to travel so would expect a low correlation between West Coast, Tasmania and Eastern Australia.
Why I was proposing a NW link within WA is that power demand by industry especially LNG and iron ore is expected to become as large as the demand in the SWIS, and the NW region also has the best CST sites.
WA also has the highest costs of power because it uses so much NG, which would be better kept for peak demand. NG prices are also higher in WA than Eastern Australia, lower cost wind power would allow NG used in LNG compression to be saved for export.

I'm mildly optimistic that the recent (and ongoing) Varanus Island gas outage will make the various stakeholders in the Pilbara a lot more interested in backing Worley Parsons' solar thermal plant project concept than they might otherwise have been - even Woodside would seem to have an interest in selling more LNG and less gas into the local market (at least as long as there is a price difference between the domestic market and the international market).

http://peakenergy.blogspot.com/2008/08/worley-parsons-solar-dream.html
http://anz.theoildrum.com/node/4279