![]() | Implications of a Ten Day Refinery Outage | The Oil Drum | Nate's Reality Report Interview - Hurricanes, Financial Markets and Peak Oil | ![]() |
241 comments on The Connection Between Financial Markets and Energy - Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
241 comments on The Connection Between Financial Markets and Energy - Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
A confused and very weak argument, bob. You claim to show that "Iraq was not about the oil" by stating that it was "shmoozed ... Neocons {who were} persuaded ... Iraq was the ideal target for the PNAC project of domino democracy." but offer no proof that any significant neo-con decisionmaker cares one iota for democracy. The schmoozed neocons caused the disastrously comically under-manned under-planned post-war occupation, but not the incentive for the occupation in the first place, which I'm on record for having called as "the oil" a month before the start of the stupid event. It was clearly obvious then, and still is.
You may want to read up some more on PNAC, it wasn't 'Democracy' that they wanted to give the world. It was the US as the supreme military superpower and a stable middle east. According to them this could be accomplished by establishing permanent 'military presence' (100 year bases) in the middle east and the removal of the Iraq leadership, whether or not Saddam was the target.
I'm not saying it wasn't about oil, as a matter of fact I believe MOSTLY it was. But stability in the middle east could have been wanted for a lot of reasons. Ollie North warned us about Bin Laden long before 9/11/2001.
I used to assign things to 'conspiracy' a lot. I believe now that our leadership honestly believes that since they were elected/chosen/whatever to do the job and they are richer/smarter/more godlike than the peasant masses, that they will make decisions and no matter what follow them through because of course they are the right decisions. Iraq fits this description perfectly.
As for Opium in Afghanistan, when the Taliban was in charge the opium trade was all but destroyed there. Now the US is using local 'leaders' to help them fight the war on terror, much their money comes from the opium trade. Of course so does the Taliban's. I've been wondering if the troop increases there are due to actually trying to get the drug problem under control more than a need for more firepower.
As its obvious I am from Pakistan, close to afghanistan and there was taliban's newspaper published here and many people went to afghanistan from here to see how they govern between 1996 and 2001. All of those people reported that taliban had destroyed all the opium farms. Its an indisputed, well known fact that taliban destroyed all the opium farms, nobody ever doubted about it before you. Though taliban needed a lot of money to build war-torn economy of afghanistan and to buy weapons to secure borders they not used any money from opium.
If talibans were using opium money then they would have tons of money but they lived very poor lives (for eg ministers went to work on bicycles etc). Also if talibans were already using opium then how can its production be increased, it would only be sustained in that case. Remember that taliban had captured 95% of afghanistan by 1996 and for the next 5 years ruled a quiet peaceful country and all the war with northern alliance was at the northern border in only 5% of land occupied by northern alliance. Given that peace and 5 years of rule they would have cultivating and trading lot more opium than americans are able to do now in a war zone. So, the very fact that after american invasion opium production increased many folds proves that taliban were not using opium.