![]() | POLL: CLV08 went through $91/bbl..so, in the next 60 days, the front month price of CL will... | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: September 17, 2008 | ![]() |
40 comments on Offshore Drilling Debate
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
40 comments on Offshore Drilling Debate
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.”
—George Carlin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
We can shut down the drive for new drilling if we just conserve enough to force the oil price down further. Oil companies are not likely to do a lot of drilling if the price of oil looks like it will hold below $30/barrel.
Even price volitility that drops that low could shut down exploration. People are not going to forget that car dealers would not pay much on trade-ins of SUVs for a while which should hurt new SUV sales for some time. If we forget and start buying SUVs again, we can get a fuel price upswing that we can beat back down again by not driving as much. As long as the spike is short, we'll still discourage exploration.
Still, our best bet is to drive the price of oil down as far as we can and keep it there as we transition off of oil. The oil price volitility is bad for the wallet.
Chris
That may be true, but voluntary conservation and rationing by price can only go so far. We can conserve even more with incentives to push us along, like the ones in this bill.
I agree that organized conservation could be the most effective. The rationing plan developed by the Economic Regulatory Administration seems quite similar to the more recently invented TEQs though it just applies to liquid fuels. The US plan is described here: http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=6307185 and TEQs are described here: http://www.teqs.net/
The incentives in both plans are that you get paid for energy you don't use.
Chris
Yea, that's THE solution: Do Buy Gas-Guzzzlers, But just Don't Use Them!
Join the Big Conversion from Vehicles into Parkicles!