Thank you for this timely article! If world demand turns out to be fairly inelastic in the short run (as I would argue), the price for fossil fuels will continue its upward path, despite volatility, and marginal projects come online until near 'unity' when production no longer makes sense and the resource stays in the ground. 'Near unity' is probably 2:1 at best given overhead, hidden costs, etc.

What I find interesting about this line of research is that it informs us about the bottom line of production; further, we can see the difficulty producers face when market volatility is so wild, no effective planning for marginal production is possible without a proverbial 'risk analysis' appendix.

Volatility, in this sense, is a form of inefficiency...

I wouldn't be surprised by talk of further 'controls' over price, markets, etc. as this problem becomes more chaotic.

I wouldn't be surprised by talk of further 'controls' over price, markets, etc. as this problem becomes more chaotic.



The world waits with bated breath for USA to nationalize the oil and gas industry. The state owns your mortgage, they are in the process of adding Wall Street to the taxpayers bill. Just add several hundred trillion and the state can own every E&P play. I'm sure Palin knows what to do with a duster.

BOP - I would have to wonder what Mrs. Palin (or her hubby) would do with the hundreds of "marginal" wells throughout the oil and gas producing regions. And, if you do not nationalize everything, how can you nationalize anything? I was pretty much shouted down for even broaching the subject of nationalization some months back. I do think at some price, the idiots in Washington will do just that, but it may take in excess of $ 500 (five hundred) / barrel. Also, if nationalized, what happens to that production when economic activity then slows to a crawl and we have $8.00 oil again?