"There is over capacity in both housing and the financial industry."
I find this a very strange idea with respect to housing. The best sense I can make out of it is that you mean there is over capacity to support the current price of housing. But if you consider that the cost of housing is likely to return to its historic trend line (and below by way of over-correction) as I do, then the idea that capacity should be reduced to stabilize prices at an inflated level is rather wrong-headed. I suggest there is lack of recognition of just how much of a bubble we have in housing.

I mean there has been a misallocation of resources. Too many home builders and investment bankers, not energy production, not enough hi tech companies working on break through energy production technologies.

Perhaps we are in agreement on this point.

We do agree on many of the dynamics. You're way of stating misled me. What I see from my perspective is a shortage of housing. If it were not so I could be buying a house rather than building my own. As owner-builder, I suffer greviously from govenment regulations but see them as part of the vested commercial interest's way of increasing their profits. Government is merely their servant.

For quite some time now, the household size in the US has been getting smaller. This is one of the big drivers of demand for more housing. Fewer people in larger houses, the affluent suburban dream, is not consistent with peak oil. It's hard to imaging household size getting much smaller - rather, as economic times get tougher and more people choose to live with their family or friends for longer periods of time, it will take even longer to work through the excess housing inventory that sparked the credit crisis.