58 comments on Energy Quality and Economic Value
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
58 comments on Energy Quality and Economic Value
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Nice work Roger.
This is in the same vein as some of recent work:
Energy Return on Investment: Towards a Consistent Framework
(AMBIO - Journal of the Human Environment 3/08)
and
A Framework for Energy Alternatives: Net Energy, Liebigs Law, and Multicriteria Analysis in the recently published Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems: Benefits and Risks (Robert Rapier also has a chapter on Renewable Diesel in that book)
Basically, you point out that both energy quality, and externalities are variables that need to be considered alongside energy surplus. For this to ever happen, social leaders will have to accept that our current 'ends' may not be the most holistic. If we don't reassess the ends and the inner workings of our social structure, we will continue to just access the most profitable energy in dollar terms that we can, quality and environment be damned....
Nate,
I agree that discussion of ends is vital. The spell of cultural 'normality' is powerful, and even people who are deeply discontented with their lives under the current order of things are mostly incapable of imagining any alternative organizing principle for economic activity. Our economic activity needs to be governed by long term ecological intelligence rather than by short term acquisitiveness. I personally do not regard such a transition in the light of a mere negative loss of comfort and convenience. It is a challenge that we need to step up to. It is strange how we admire tales of dangerous heroic quests, but cannot bear the thought of any interruption to our middle class safety and security.
This was precisely the gaping whole at the recent ASPO-USA conference. For the most part the presenters were stupefied by this question or actually assumed BAU-lite.
Well, I think there may be a BUA-lite for a few years. That's what everyone will be trying to support anyway. We'll see. I think it depends on how far out you can see. The longer forward, temporally, you can envision, the less comparable to current norms / expectations you're likely to see (baring cold-fusion or some other techno-fix of course).