58 comments on Energy Quality and Economic Value
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
58 comments on Energy Quality and Economic Value
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
- Leading the Way to a Low-Energy Future
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
- From Counterculture To Cyberculture: The Life And Times Of Stewart Brand
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“I'd put my money on solar energy… I hope we don't have to wait til oil and coal run out before we tackle that.”
—Thomas Edison, in conversation with Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone, March 1931
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Memmel
I have been likewise thinking (and trying small-scale cultivation) in spare time for 25 or more years in northern England.
Is it worth, however, now backing up a bit, and looking at possible different scenarios? I wonder about North America where there is vastly more land.
Having previously regarded growing biofuels as useless for substituting for current total transport fuel usage (biofuels are a really ludicrous idea in the UK as soon as one checks the numbers), I wonder nevertheless about farms in mostly rural communities growing fuel mostly just for the farm. (The trend round here has been to use ever larger more efficient machines - economies of scale.) If a large farm needs 2 guys (which is normal where I live), how much home-grown fuel could they need to service the farm? The fuel growing would not export soil nutrients away from the farm. (edit. Not 'draining' the soil fertility from farms is critical if NPK imports are limited. There are historical analogies with large estates served by vast human labor having a small per capita food surplus for 'export' or 'tax', or similarly with present 2000 year old Chinese villages served by a high density of persons who are sustained by and renew their high-yielding presently 12t/ha/yr grain systems using these days some supplementary synthetic N input.)
In an alternative 'post-modern' scenario, non-farming populations local to large farms could grow their own vegetables and fruit of very high nutritional value very efficiently in gardens that were sustainably manured by compost toilets, collecting particularly the high NK urine fraction. Their main calories needs, however, would be served by the mechanized big farms. The big farms would need to retrieve (with machinery) a proportional fraction of the composted humanure to balance the farm's soil nutrients budget.
One problem is to figure out what total non-farming population might be carried by a region supported in this way. It is hard to imagine the region supporting large urban populations.
[ So far I (we), in our very large garden have been able to maintain or enhance easily cultivated soil and maintain (just) soil fertility for garden produce, but we still need to 'parasitise' the local large scale farm. (He does not need up to now too many 'symbionts'). So far though, on prime garden soil, I cannot improve on moving swiftly with timely cultivations using a large '3rd-world' hoe, coupled with straw mulches ex my large farm neighbour!]
Well first you probably should rethink how you farm. For example plowing do you need a mechanical plow or can you use a different method. And idea I got from the oil drum is to use hydrostatic pressure to break up soil. In this case you simply need to be able to drill a hole or cut a narrow trench to insert a high pressure balloon deep in the soil then fill it with water or air.
The pressure will lift up the overburden breaking up the soil better than plowing.
This idea comes from the hydrfracturing of NG wells :)
Next for energy on the farm a return to the lowly steam engine makes a lot of sense if your using biofuels. External combustion beats internal in this case since the fuel need not be processed.
Another possibility thats higher tech is solid oxide fuel cells. And one I'm interested in is liquid nitrogen powered equipment. Thus on the farm there seems to be no intrinsic reason to use internal combustion.
Fluidics also represent a wonderful opportunity to build simple logic circuits that are robust and can handle a lot of the control needs for a automated farm.
Finally and surprisingly it seems no one is looking at smell on the farm. By smell I mean identifying the situation by using volatiles. Weeds smell diferrently from crop plants ripe fruit is obvious by its smell. I laugh when I see these picking machines developed using advanced vision algorithms when a simple visual algo coupled with a good nose can pick the perfect fruit any day of the week.
So much is possible its astounding all you have to do is think outside the box just a bit and focus on the problems that need to be solved in farming. For whatever reason it seems farming has been neglected it seems we have chosen to assume that every farm problem is best solved with a tractor. I actually don't see the need for tractors at all with a bit of thought. Various hydraulic methods using water or air seem to be capable of solving most farming problems.