![]() | The Failure of Networked Systems: The Repercussions of Systematic Risk | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: October 26, 2008 | ![]() |
32 comments on New Oil and Gas Technology Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
32 comments on New Oil and Gas Technology Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Sometimes it seems like we are running out of time to develop and introduce new technologies.
I believe the average length of time between initial use and widespread adoption of a new technology is 17 years. When you add time for development, it is really a log lag.
Gail, you hit the nail on the head. there is a technical paper on adoption of new technologies for O & Gas sector. The article is titled:
"Do Nothing": Technology's
Toughest Competitor in the Upstream Oil and Gas
Industry" by Ali Daneshy
Basically there is the old boys club (procrastinators), then there is the new highly educated Eng. who wants to make a name of himself, (early adopters)
Dr Daneshy was the director of the Society of Petroleum Eng.
I have been involved(minor) with introducing new tech to the oil fields, especially the Canadian Tar sands. The process steps are:
1 enquire about it at tech shows/ seminars and produce a SPE paper.
2 at meetings discuss all other competitors
3 possible referral or phone enquiry directly to new tech company
4 arrange for bench testing in one or two quarters
5 additional bench test but also including evaluations for on site mock-up test
6 prepare for on site test with customer.
7 on site field test.
time span= 18 months, then if all goes well a larger scaled size test. It usually takes a new company 5yrs or so to have a fully commissioned full sized product running. But then the customer now evaluates the long term operational expenses, Capex vs Opex. If all goes well its a sale, if a top oil producer agrees, they all line up. The second path is to do all the above mentioned but with an oil service company such as SLB/ Weatherford/ Hal etc., but the object of this game is to build up the reputation of the new company name. If you are going global, expect 10 to 14yrs before sector wide acceptance. This is the short form. Its not easy breaking into the oil & Gas industry plain and simple.
Regards Oilcan