22 comments on October 24, 2008 OPEC Meeting Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
22 comments on October 24, 2008 OPEC Meeting Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
So my tin foil hat conspiracy goes like this;
By May/June of this year, Reservoir pressure in Ghawar waned to the point Saudis had to cut production pretty hard by the end of 2008. GWB was stopping by routinely to beg for oil, and this Simmons guy was gaining followers by the day. They were in a predictament.
So how do they cut production in an environment where the trade is short bank stocks and long oil? The worse the financial crisis was, the more that investors leaned on the PO story. To cut production while this thinking was at hand was to send the world into chaos. They needed a price collapse.
Meanwhile, the Fed needed to print money/lower interest to help banks, but they couldn't do it until the commodity bull was dead. Somebody new had to enter the oil market and short NYMEX crude with a massive position. But who could tip over the oil speculative bubble without risking everything they had? Someone who actually had the oil, and lots of it, like 9 mbpd worth of it.
So a deal was made between Secratary Paulson and Saudi. The Saudis sold 6 months or better worth of oil on the NYMEX through some shadow investment trading firm, selling each rally, and spooking investors. Meanwhile, the gov't would launch CFTC investigations etc to do their part.
Once energy shares in the Dow etc went to tanking, investors got spooked and pulled money out of 401Ks, and set the dominoes further. Ultimately the price crashes to the point neither banks not investors have confidence in anything.
Throw in the housing problem and you have a powder keg.
The Saudis get to cut an amount unthinkable just 4 months earlier, they got a higher price for that oil via hedges, and they killed alternative energy, all in one fell swoop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it interseting that they cut more than promised at their Sept meeting, and yet the news really isn't running with that story.
It seems the financial news tries to rationalize why things happen, and the truth is often left out. The story is demand destruction, NOT falling supplies, and that is to continue until prices rise.
Give us a break!
My bet is Secretary Paulson did not even think about oil, except to consider fleetingly, perhaps, that the only good news he has received is that the price of oil is going down.
The good news for the Saudis is that with the price where it is and the credit crunch - countries/companies will halt/defer investment in fields where the cost per barrel will be potentially higher than the market price and also it will slow down investment in alternative energy sources. All beneficial to the Saudis in the long run.
On the other hand the Saudis do not want the price to be so high that it exacerbates the worldwide recession/depression, which could crash the price.
To mix my golden metaphors - they will go for the Goldilocks solution - the "just right" level of reduced production that will keep the cash registers tingling without killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.