Sure... I'm not much of a blogger but I'll check back now and then to see if there are any burning fuel cell questions.

But everybody should remember that a fuel cell is just the icing on the cake; using an ammonia-fueled device is the easy part - the real challenge is gaining acceptance for its use as a fuel in the first place.

A fuel cell gives you chemical-to-electric energy with less total losses than an ICE-powered genset, but at a greater capital cost. Fuel cell costs have come down quite a bit in the last several years, let's hope that trend continues!

I heard cost estimates this week of $7K per kilowatt for hydrogen fuel cells. Are NH3 cells similar? An ICE generator is of course significantly less. For low-run use, fuel cost is less significant than considerations such as fuel shelf life, genset total maintenance, run-time between planned maintenance events, and other factors that play into total cost of ownership.

Do NH3 fuel cells get the same incentives as H2?