Yeah, I ripped off a lot of common practise in Germany in particular to re-present it in my blog - the point is that there is no way the energy gap will be filled in time, whatever we build, as the time is just too short, even though they probably won't close some of the coal plants they now say they will for emissions reasons, so conservation is the first option:
http://energy-futures.blogspot.com/2008/02/conservationour-best-route-to...
Please note that since writing this I have changed my mid about residential solar thermal, which originally thought ineffective in the UK as it does not provide much hot water at peak in the winter, and hence would not help the grid much.
It is now apparent that the situation is so dire that any contribution at all is needed, but insulation is still much more cost effective.

The thing is though that Germany and Denmark have addressed their problems on a long-term basis, and so have super-insulated large portions of their housing stock, use a lower proportion of gas, have better stockpiling arrangements and long term supply contracts etc - in other words they are far better prepared than the UK, although not so well as France with it's nuclear contribution.

In the UK we are just going to have to patch something up on an emergency basis, or freeze, hence my attempt to show some quick bodges to reduce energy use, even if it means living in one room.

I have personally bought greenhouse-type bubble plastic, which I will use to seal the windows if we get power cuts.

My experience with solar thermal in winter is mixed. At present I have 2 x 20 vacuum tubes heating a 120 litre tank. On bright sumnny days even in the depth of winter this arrangement will add 30-40 degrees of heat to the tank - 5-6 kwh per day. Heavily overcast days and you are lucky to get a 5 degree temperature lift.

That said for a 4 bedroom detatched house I have reduced gas consumption to 7500kwh per annum (electricity is around 35ookwh per annum)

Hi Nick.
I had not known that there was such a big difference when it is overcast.
The only figures I have seen just contrasted winter and summer, without going into cloud cover.
It sounds as though you are getting around 2,000kwh from your set-up, as it would increase the temperature more in summer - is that about right?
What was the cost of your system?
I am wondering about creating a separate blog, to deal exclusively with practical energy saving measures in the UK climate, where we can tabulate experience such as yours - a sort of 'Popular Mechanics Goes Warm!'

Hi Dave

I would be happy to do that and provide figures and photos.

My system as a DIY install came in at about £1150. Installation took about 4-5 days. It basically consists of 2 20 tube panels, a controller, pump, pressure vessel, and a retrofit coil that inserts into my cylinder via the immersion.

I have calculated that my set up should deliver 3000-3200 kwh per annum. Typically a 20 tube (47mm x 1500mm vacuum tube) system should deliver 1450 - 1600 kwh annually. I have 40 tubes in total.

Today for example the base of my water tank at 8am was 19 degrees. At 6pm 46 - so a 27 degree increase at the base. The tap water is about 65 degrees suggesting some stratifcation in the tank. I would guess todays yield is in the region of 5kwh - not bad less than 55 days from winter equinox.

Regards

Nick