Todd, those who successfully impact others share a common trait of believing 100% in their own ideas. It's why the best salespeople go into politics or finance as opposed to lower margin used cars or mattresses.

Of course neither these salespeople types, nor Jay Hanson, are immune to self-deception. Self-deception allows us to believe our own schtick and thus be more persuasive. Jay's case IMO, is slightly different because of his personality. I sincerely believe that he doesn't care one whit what people think of him, and only cares about the ideas. I'm certain he would agree though, that he has gotten some 'dopamine' over the years from being ultimate tribal chief on his listservs.

I do differ with him on several areas in his videos. Although intended to be simplistic, the one on net energy is technically incorrect- we use very little oil in oil production - most of the energy input is electricity and natural gas (much of which can be accessed on site). So even when we do approach energy break-even for world oil production, we will continue to produce it an an energy loss, because it's value to society will be higher than the other lower quality energy inputs. I'm sure Jay knows this but to get into that amount of detail for someone seeing the concept for the first time would make the clip too long. And in any case, this is splitting hairs - if we are close to energy break even, we will already know the answer to the Mr. Moose voice question....

You've talked to Jay so my response is my gut feeling...I don't think self-deception is likely. He could be intellectually wrong and not see the error. However, I haven't seen anyone really poke holes in his position. But, there appears to be an underlying insecurity on his part since his fall-back position on the forums was that "I've studied this more than you."

Finally, his actions appear more in line with someone who has experienced, at least, the beginning stages of enlightenment. Truly enlightened people almost never are on the forefront pushing their ideas. People interested in this might search to see if the Zen parable, The Oxherder, is somewhere on the internet. This is a series of ten pictures outlining the path to enlightenment.

I'm sure Jay would throw up his arms at this. But, what the heck.

Todd

Nate,
Great post!
I found that many of mine understandings of the future came from reading articles on dieoff.org, but I found it hard to recommend it to others as I felt that the understanding of realities were worlds apart. Many people are in for some tough revisions of their world beliefs in the near future.

On trading “lower worth” energy sources with those of higher worth, like oil, is something that in my opinion already is taking place.

Look at China and its growing coal consumption to produce electricity which fuels (or fuelled) their growth in industrial output, generating huge trade surpluses which again is traded to increase imports of energy sources of “greater worth” like…..oil.

One simplistic way to look upon that is that China is now effectively trading indigenous coal for oil imports.

I dunno Nate, I think the connection between electricity generation and oil/gas production is a bit more complex than just saying "we use very little oil in oil production".
When we start building power stations, wind turbines, solar panels, hydro etc and their support networks with electricity then you can say the above.
Until then we are dependant on oil for electricity generation or more precisely the means to gather, construct and maintain the components, even a small amount of oil missing in a vital connection would spell the demise of meaningful oil production.

As you described in a reply above "why was he able to read over 3,000 books on these subjects and connect threads that most people still find opaque"........... Hanson sees the connects a little more clearly than others.