Thanks Jerome, for drilling down beneath the press headlines with your critical analysis.

Yes, it seems that Commissioner Piebalgs has promulgated a plan that outlines substantive progress across a number of fronts, integrating several directly and indirectly related topics into a coalescing whole.

Comments like "Mediterranean energy ring, linking Europe with the Southern Mediterranean... to help develop the vast solar and wind energy potential" IMO shows the influence (directly or indirectly) of TOD through articles such as Stuart Staniford's Powering Civilization to 2050. Congratulations, TOD, visions and plans like this make it all worthwhile. And people like you, Jerome, are ones who are carrying these plans through to such fruition. Kudos, kudos, kudos.

A minor quibble I might make refers to the comment "Nabucco (which can be built only if gas is found to fill it, the only credible source right now being Russian gas". Right now, Kazakhstan has reserves and upcoming additional marketable production, and they are seeking Western markets. Until the EU can wean themselves from gas with policies such as the UK's 2016 Net Zero Carbon Building codes and can replace NG in electrical generation and industrial processes, Nabucco will be needed to reduce the growing geopolitical power wielded by the (growling) Sleeping Bear. I would prefer, of course, to see much more wind and solar energy backed by hydro on a smart supergrid, and an all-out pursuit of geothermal power, as it is a desperately needed baseload source.

Replacing NG use is as smart as it gets.

Putting Kazakhstan gas into (non-existent) Nabucco is unrealistic because, in addition to building Nabucco, you need, at the same time, to build a TransCaspian pipeline - when Kazakhstan already has access to pipelines to Russia. ie Russia will always be able to offer a beeter price to Kzakhstan for its gas than any other buyer that additionally needs to pay for the pipeline that would take the gas. That will remain true as long as the pipes to Russia are not full, which is far from the case.

Replacing NG use is as smart as it gets.

Concur. What measures could be taken to wean EU buildings off of NG heat? I can see some geothermal district heating, though such resources are not evenly distributed, and conversion to district heating can be fraught with obstacles in local cultures and practices. Perhaps geothermal heat pumps powered by additional wind/geothermal power? I can see energy efficiency through greater ceiling insulation, but most types of walls would need extensive renovation to add insulation.

I see your point on Nabucco.

Don't tell us, tell the EU Energy Commissioner. As I note above, he is quite keen on Nabucco.

Georgia, Africa and the security of energy supply
The complex meaning of diversification
Making Nabucco a reality
The door to Eastern energy

and so on. Just on the page of most recent articles, four are basically about gas and oil from the Caspian, while only one is about solar and one about wind.

Yeah, the EC's obsession about Nabucco is just beyond my understanding

It's the same as the Persian Gulf with the US. When a large portion of your energy goes through one route, or from one country, you want to either,

(a) control that country/route, or
(b) have some alternatives

The EU cannot control Russia and the central Asian republics, so it must find another route.

Either the EU has Nabucco, or else Russia has the EU.

Well, unless the EU stops using natural gas and oil and goes only for renewables, but that's just crazy talk I know... :)

I believe it is because they are afraid of power Russia wields with it energy club. Unless they can make drastic reductions in natural gas consumption, they feel they have to get the natural gas from somewhere.