I get that the decrease in demand has influenced the decrease in oil prices. What I don't get is that the decrease in demand is nothing compared to the percentage decrease in oil prices. The way things are going, I would not bet that oil prices are going to stay above or at $50 for the rest of the year.

Nobody ever said demand/price curves had to be linear.

Thinking of this as an accordian effect. The oil price signal just a few months ago was telling producers to bring every drop they could to market. So there was a long train of oil supply rushing to the scene with a bunch of inertia.

The meltdown has in these few short months taken trillions of dollars out of the investment market. At the same time demand has fallen off. The combination of falling demand and the evaporation of the hedge fund capital has caused a new lower price signal to be sent to the producers but the train of imports from the previous signal has not stopped 'stacking up' similar to those fleets of cars and trucks clogging up ports around the world.

Meanwhile no new 'demand' (with the possible exception of Japan imports) signal is forthcomming and therefore the price continues to fall in light of supplies building. It will take some new demand signal like ,heating oil or increased driving due to lower price, to get the train moving again, or simply time as the realization sets in that current consumption is still plenty strong enough to do in ELM.

Either that or some heretofore unknown clarity on the supply outlook. I echo all those who maintain that the current low oil price is doing untold harm. An energy tax designed to smooth out volitility and reward alternatives is in order. To the contributors here at TOD many thanks for keeping us focused as to the realistic supply outlook, the need for preparation, and the other countless issues of the day.

What I don't get is that the decrease in demand is nothing compared to the percentage decrease in oil prices.

The increase in oil prices bore little/no resemblance to the increase in demand when things were inflating... why should you expect the downside to be much different?

If I'm not misunderstanding this (and maybe I am, I'm not claiming to be a major economics expert) it's good evidence of the very severe inelasticity of the demand / supply relationship.

Small excess of demand over supply = disproportionate price hike
Small excess of supply over demand = disproportionate price drop

I see it as an illustration of the extreme dependence of the modern economy on oil.

The foreseeable future looks like this to me: every time the economy starts expanding "healthily", that only lasts until the demand for oil exceeds the supply for a while, and energy prices then proceed to skyrocket, inducing another recession.

We will lurch from crisis to crisis, with the inexorable shrinkage of supply over the long term, meaning booms getting shorter and weaker, with recessions getting longer and deeper.

I wish I didn't think this, but I do. :[

Regards Chris