77 comments on The 2008 IEA WEO - Renewable Energy
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
77 comments on The 2008 IEA WEO - Renewable Energy
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
—Gandhi
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Making predictions for next year is very difficult. Let alone 20 years from now.
It seems that the economic predictions made just a few short months ago do not hold anymore.
How then can anyone predict what the world will look like in 20 years?
World will have to change a lot before any predictions made that far out will have any significance.
At the very least there should be some margins of error reported for far out predictions.
You can't, and you're spot on, it's one of the things the IEA doesn't get. Don't ask for a full sensitivity analysis from the IEA, such rigorous scientific methods are beyond them. The problem is, if the IEA did sensitivity analysis, they could not make any scenarios and would realise the future is extremely uncertain. So they do highly limited sensitivity analysis, on only one or two variables, so they can jump to conclusions. The IEA has radically altered their predictions/scenarios/projections from a few years ago as they couldn't predict even short term development in energy markets. The 2030 scenario is a good laugh at best. I wouldn't be surprised if they'll radically change their 'business as usual' scenarios next year and this prediction will again be way off.
Levelised cost of electricity estimates are also highly dubious; again no sensitivity analysis whatsoever. Already the cost vary greatly with geography even today. Concentrating solar? Amateuristic nomenclature.
We cannot predict the future with any reasonable accuracy or credibility. However, we can help invent the future. The IEA should put their energy into how best to do that, rather than these highly unusual 'business as usual' scenarios.