58 comments on General Jones and the Chamber of Commerce Energy Plan
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
58 comments on General Jones and the Chamber of Commerce Energy Plan
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”
—Albert Einstein
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Guess the real message here is that the "best ideas" are small ideas; as in relatively easy to do things.
Real "change" would have addressed something like revitalization of highly dense cities and moving Federal support away from single family homes with large lawns to smaller, denser units, or the move away from airport centered/Interstate centered long distance travel towards rail based, or some move away from trucks toward viable alternatives.
That would have been a shock. The list is nice, interesting, would be cool to see implemented, but not exactly sure of if they will have huge effects.
BTW - speaking of smart grids the National Science Foundation had a good podcast on the subject called "Bridges to the Future, Part I: The Smart Grid"
I wonder how long it’ll be until the national CoC comes asking for a bailout? Because there’s no way anyone could have seen this climate thing coming.
I heard Solomon on a talk-show recently and he certainly needs to be bailed out of his asshattery.
"Real Change" would be to address sustainable human world population and set a US population target that takes into consideration the fuel consumption and carbon footprint of the average US citizen. I suspect this would result in a target of less than 200 million - family planning and immigration programs would need to be near the top of the list.
Real change would be a national motor vehicle speed limit of 45 mph and the removal of all crash protection requirements except seat belts (and maybe air bags). This would give some real motivation for "viable alternatives".
Either peak oil and global warming are real and urgent threats or they are not. If they are not particulary urgent, then the list is fine. If these threats are urgent, and we don't take drastic steps, then our great grandchildren (I have one) will come to hate our greed and stupidity.