![]() | The IEA WEO 2008: Long term prospects for coal production | The Oil Drum | IEA WEO 2008 - NGLs to the Rescue? | ![]() |
233 comments on DrumBeat: December 5, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
233 comments on DrumBeat: December 5, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils, for time is the greatest innovator.”
—Francis Bacon, Essays
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
November: Most jobs lost in 34 years: Payrolls shrink by 533,000, bringing 11-month decline to 1.9 million. Unemployment soars to 6.7%
And then there's this:
Denninger now thinks Paulson never had any intention of paying off our foreign creditors. It was just an excuse.
Probably about time, or past the time, for a lot of people to start making contingency plans for extended family members to consolidate in one house, presumably one where a garden can be established, or extended.
Just to make sure we are preparing in the correct order. Should we make these plans before or after we prepare for 8$ gas on 8/8/08?
As you no doubt recall, I said to assume gasoline would be $8 on 8/8/08, basically as part of my ELP advice. I said, starting in 2006 and outlined more fully in April, 2007, to assume that your income drops by half and assume that energy prices more than double. I also said, in April, 2007, that we would see deflationary trends in the auto, housing and finance sectors with inflationary trends in food & energy. I would submit that anyone who sold their suburban McMansion to a Yerginite Believer, and moved to small rented energy efficient housing along a mass transit line, or close to their job (preferably in a job on the non-discretionary side) is in better shape than they would otherwise be.
http://graphoilogy.blogspot.com/2007/04/elp-plan-economize-localize-prod...
April, 2007
Having said that, am I surprised by the downturn in oil prices? Yes.
My question: What advice have you been offering over the past few years? Party on dude? Buy more SUV's and suburban real estate with 100% financing?
I say give the neighbors Prius envy.
I actually own a condo only a short mass transit from my job. I have no problems with some of the practice advice, and I agree with you on selling the suburban mcmansion and trading to a more practical vehicle. What I take issue with is fear mongering, and telling people that its past time they start preparing to live like the Waltons is just that.
You have got to be kidding me. You must be living in a different economic universe from the one that the rest of us live in.
What's wrong with living like the Waltons anyway. They had a huge house, a barn, a workshop, and some land. That sounds pretty good to me!
Yah, but you would likely turn your brain to mush saying things like "goodnight Jim Bob" and "That was great".
Well you know it's not all bad. I ended up a "Brady" bunch. Tiny house, ended up a single parent with 2 boys. a few years down the line, I met a wonderful single mother with 2 daughters. Talk about insanity. Went from batching it, to a bunch of women. We had to make the deck a new room, 3 quick walls and a roof. put the girls upstairs and the boys in the basement. Wife and I got the new room on the ground floor. A tiny bit of seperation helps a lot. One bathroom saw a lot of traffic, and even some urgent pounding on the door. Not the guys, we all headed outside in a pinch.
Tolerance goes a long way, they all now are the best of friends. Grown to adults.
Pigs, chickens, good damn dog, all the kids remember this as heaven. Each has approached me, if it would be ok, if they are stuck to head back here. I think you all know my answer. I'm really proud they are all as strong as they are. Gawd talk about assets. Both boys can outshoot me. Better eyes.
Younger son's significant other is born to the crossbow. Not a one of us can come close.
Some days we used to get furious with each other, but threaten us all and we pull together. We do it now all the time. a touch, a hug, a hug for the plott hound. Darn dawg was another stray, we have a pile of strays here. Each says it in their own way. Damn dawg is on duty. Big time.
I clean toilets for work, to get cash. My life is some good.
Don in Maine
Oh by the way I beat you all to that job cleaning toilets, you get to be unemployed. Sounds cool right, you don't collect either.
The problem, and we all do it, is in thinking of prices in absolute $ values. If your ability to pay is dropping faster than the notional price is, then the cost is going up. Corrected for deflation, the cost of fuel has not dropped as far as it appears to have. I wonder what the cost of fuel looks like to one of the 533k who lost their jobs last month?
You advice was/is sound. The confluence of PO, climate change, and economic and political collapse is bound to be very complex and the timing of specific events hard to predict. It's amazing that some cannot even see it happening around them.
Also, the assumption that everything will happen at an even rate in all geographic and social regions is naive.
I think that is one of the most important points ever made on this board.
I think one problem for the "average joe/jane" is they tend to think in terms of "all or none" happening everywhere all at once. But every locale has unique variables for their food and energy distribution systems, governmental functions, utilities/city services, ethnic mixes...
Each locale has different strengths and weaknesses based on "genes' (people) and the local environmental limitations (climate and resources) those 'genes' happen to be in.
So, you are absolutely right, The Symptoms of Collapse certainly will not be distributed equally over time or place.
All are at the mercy of The Real Market (i.e. Nature).
There is no "safe," only safer. And what is "safer" today may not be safer tomorrow.
Like Dmitry Orlov says (paraphrase), "it's good to make plans, but also plan to change plans frequently"
Unfortunately, employment tends to be binary, either you have a job or you don't and it tends to be a rather large variable in the survival equation.
Picture 533,000 newly unemployed w/wheelbarrows moving O-NPK, converting land into permaculture plots, building narrow-gauge minitrains and SpiderWeb networks to 'ribcage' support the buildout of Alan's 'spine and limbs' standard-gauge ideas, Terra Preta industries and reforestation work, plus building minimal water usage facilities:
http://web.archive.org/web/19960101-re_/http://www.uni-kiel.de/sino/ar/s...
Or will the US fiddle around until we replicate Zimbabwe's 90% unemployment rate and short life expectancy? Are Americans ready to balance 100lbs of firewood on their heads while walking barefoot through broken glass, thorns, and sewage?
My guess is that China will move in this more optimal direction much faster than the US. Recall previous weblink where they are racing to build lots of additional standard-gauge track miles. Will China start building out narrow-gauge minitrain and SpiderWebRiding networks soon? Much, much cheaper than asphalt at $100,000 per mile.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
There's gonna be a lot more than 533,000 newly unemployed souls moving O-NPK...
Oh, and while you're at it, we can burn that asphalt with the right boiler (PDF WARNING!) and use our very roads to power our energy descent.
moving O-NPK... the story of my life
Remember when they thought we had too much broadband? Build it and they will come.
The actual number of unemployed in the USA is somewhere between 15 and 20 million. How many wheelbarrows are there in America?
And what happens if you lose your job and can't get another one?
Moving in with your parents or a sibling sounds like a good "Plan B" to me, whether they have a garden or not.
But isn't advising moving in with them now when they haven't lost a job (and may never) advocate panic reactions and serve to make the problem worse (as wherever they own now sits empty on the market)?
'for a lot of people to start making contingency plans'
We have contingency plans here in Florida in case there is a hurricane. I've never heard someone make the argument that planning for a hurricane, or for losing a job, makes the problem worse and invites panic reactions.
Usually quite the opposite.
I'm all for everybody craming into single houses with their extended family and growing their own food. That'll leave cheap and plentiful resources for me!
Also in Florida,,,,Yes, but it is truly amazing when a CAT 3 comes into range, the number of idiots out on the street and in the stores, that have not done a minutes worth of prep all year. Like the "Idiot Fairies" kidnapped them one night, and they just woke up in South Florida the next morning?????
Trouble is, a huge majority of people in this country will wait until it's too f**king late.
DING DING DING!
Who cares? The government will bail me out tomorrow.
"Never do today what you can put off 'til tomorrow."
Why? Because by tomorrow it may no longer be necessary and so by having done it today you've wasted effort and likely fucked something up. For it's in the doing of things that things get fucked up. Procrastination is a virtue.
Fear mongering?
If the converging economic, climatic and energetic problems civilisation now faces doesn't scare the **** out of you, seek help.
I've been trying to live up to westexas ELP recommendations and so far it worked out very well for me. I needed a new roof on my small house, created an extra storey in the process, and paid cash thanks very much.
"We’re going to keep trying to strengthen the American family, to make them more like the Waltons and less like the Simpsons."
- George Herbert Walker Bush, 1992
Actually, at least a couple of years ago, I wish there had been more fear mongering, and I wish this fear mongering had been in the main stream press. As bad as I thought the financial system might be, it is worse that my worst fears. Actually, the Waltons lived in a pretty big house as I recall.
And it wasn't so bad. They had large "people carriers" even back then :)
Fear mongering? Holy Crap. Does it even enter your thoughts that there is a huge difference between now and 1929. How many people make or sell things that people NEED???
This is going to be worse than you seem to understand. 533,000 jobs in a month. What are they going to do? A job selling holiday trinkets?
Just how easy is it to predict the future? Close is far better for everyone than what I see Paulson et al doing. Put your faith into the panic stricken leadership we have now if you want. Good luck - you'll need it. I think Jeffery has been insightful.
D
What trigged my comment was the following e-mail I sent out this morning to some family members (names deleted to protect the innocent). Fortunately, my daughter and son-in-law (who works in the energy services industry) followed my advice and did not buy a house. They are renting a townhouse along a mass transit line. (The designated fallback position would be our house.)
If a family can do as well as the "Waltons" the next few years I'd say they will be part of the upper middle class
Part of it may be that everyone was jolted awake and suddenly realized that they already had all of the plastic crap that they really needed - more than enough, really. An economy based upon people just buying real necessities would be a much healthier one, but the transition will be hell for a lot of people.
WNC Observer writes "Part of it may be that everyone was jolted awake and suddenly realized that they already had all of the plastic crap that they really needed - more than enough, really."
That's where I'm at. I can't speak for others but that's why I haven't bought much in the last 6 months. Car manufacturers build cars to last longer. I probably won't need another vehicle for five years. Markets are saturated. The pain caused by harder-to-get-credit needed for getting more unneeded stuff is greater than the boredom caused by using what we have now.
That's me - I go and look at all the stuff I don't need.
How big will the suction from the downdraft be? This is my concern. Our business is healthy and debt free. But we are restructuring to meet a fully changed demand to necessities, and none too soon imho.
If I'm prepared to "live like the waltons" I'll be better off than most.
It's not only way past time that they start preparing but it is past time they actually started. Living life king size is all very well on borrowed money till the lenders realize that the IOUs they've been issued are little better than Charmin.
Srivathsa
I was once told I was fear mongering, too.
It seems to be a reaction that occurs when the person making the statement isn't yet operating in the same context as the person providing the warning.
It's clear to me that you don't see what some of the rest of us see so Jeffrey's advice makes no sense to you. Of course, if and when your context changes, his advice will seem both prudent and prescient.
I stumbled across a remarkable CNBC clip, filmed almost a year ago. CNBC's Closing Bell interviews the CEO of Overstock.com, Patrick Bryne. (It gets good about 2:45 minutes into the video):
The hilarity comes when the co-host, Dylan Ratigan, tries to steer the conversation into happyland. Ratigan's stammering rationalization says a lot about how and why humanity finds itself in the predicament it does.
Well, he's right we have 'spent a part of the future' -the issue is that a lot of people have come to think we can continue that model ad-infinitum. It's become written into the 'business case' of our society.
Now reality is hitting and the figures don't stack up any more...
Nick.
A buddy of mine at work is trying to 'trade up' his 1k SF home about 30 minutes from work for a newer 2k SF home about 10 minutes further out right now. He's convinced it's a great deal....corner lot (more water and mowing!), hardwood floors, more space and all that. As he's telling me how much the home is 'really worth', I ask what if home prices keep dropping? He's already upside down in his current house.
He pauses for a second, then says he's sure it won't drop much more. He's not worried about the extra driving distance. I can't bring myself to nag him about it any more.
Maybe I should just print out your ELP article and leave it on his desk.
Do you think he'll be able to get financing? The bank may impose ELP, whether he likes it or not.
It appears likely, he's going through a credit union and they sound positive.
My mother, who has been a mortgage officer in Mississippi for many years, has said she's seen a lot of earnest money become forfeit because people got pre-approved but then couldn't get the actual loan when push came to shove. There are a lot of strange rules that have recently been imposed on borrowers.
We've laid off about 10% of our workforce here. I just can't imagine why, even if I didn't know peak oil from a hole in the ground, people would be looking at extending themselves finanically right now. Optimism runs deep, I guess.
Maybe he should do a Donald trump on the bank. Check this out. Chutzpah takes on a new meaning.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28069720 See an excerpt.
"Those assertions are made in a fascinating lawsuit filed by Mr. Trump, the real estate developer, television personality and best-selling author, in an effort to avoid paying $40 million that he personally guaranteed on a construction loan that Deutsche Bank [AG 18.69 -0.66 (-3.41%) ] says is due and payable.
Rather than have to pay the $40 million, Mr. Trump thinks the bank should pay him $3 billion for undermining the project and damaging his reputation."
Apparently the Great Combover in the Sky is at the root (pun not intended) of his problems and he should be allowed a force majeure on his loan.
Srivathsa
P.S. I think I managed to post this inadvertently down below where it is completely irrelevant
Westexas,
I don't think you need to feel any 'guilt' because you didn't prophecy the collapse of the oil price. It would have probably continued it's upward tragectory but for the dramatic decline in the world's economy, which isn't an excuse, rather an explanation.
I actually mentioned to a few of my friends, I can't remember if I said it here, that oil could fall in price, but only if the world entered a severe economic downturn, which I didn't think would happen so soon and so violently.
For the last two or three years I've been getting more and more nervous as the signs of imminent collapse became clearer and more obvious. My reaction was to sell almost everything I had in paper, buy a house with a big garden for cash and spend the rest taking my daughters around the world first class. I wanted to give them something good to remember in the hard times.
I often mentioned that if we enter a big depression the price could fall and buy us some time. Sometimes I didn't say it, though, and sometimes people forget that I said that. In any case, nit-picking the messenger wastes everyone's time and usually is done only to satisfy the ego of the person doing the nit-picking.
I'm not so sure this is buying us any time. I think it may be taking it away.
The financial collapse is taking away funding for alternate energy, from the global level to the individual. Nobody has the money to move away from oil...and the current low price makes it seem unnecessary.
Obama
This is the real nail in the cornucopian's coffin. Even if all the high tech pipe dreams were actually physically feasible, they are going to be financially impossible.
We're stuck in what is pretty much a "come as you are party" - make do with whatever inexpensive, low-tech stuff we can still manage to pull together.
Leanan:
At the macro level or if the wage earner lost their job you are absolutely right and funding will be a problem. But at the micro level of an individual, there isn't much holding back a lot of energy preperations. The thing I worry about is the availablity of parts, though to date there is no problem. My golf cart solar project will be done soon. Our half acre community garden area will be started this spring. The solar hot house may (???) be ready in time for the early planting. Lots can be done on the individual level. Consider that a great deal of luck will be involved. At 75 health issues are a concern though my wife and I are in excellent health now.
Also my 'Get up and GO, got up and Went and I forgot where.' :-)
Lynford,
Would you mind sharing some of the details of your hot house ? Climate it'll be in, size, materials, sort of stuff.
Similar to this
http://www.gardeners.com/Affordable-Grow-House/GreenhousesSheds_CompactG...
But longer, oriented east and west, with 30 black cubical metal cans (~10 gal each) filled with water along the south plastic wall two cans high. I will build shoji doors for it. I’m a woodworker. My preferred style is simple oriental and a little shoji touch will be nice.
It really isn’t much of a deal because PVC bends well and there are lots of fittings available to make the frame. A diagonal cable from the top of one end to the bottom of the other end making an ‘X’ will add tremendous racking strength. We sometimes have 50mph winds here.
You being a woodworker is what piqued my curiosity.
Years ago I made a chair and multi-level work table out of PVC . It's likely I'll be using PVC in my new career, HVAC/R also.
I hope the water filled cans work for you. I first learned of the Trombe wall concept in a book that was for passive solar engineering. Wish now I still had that book.
With 50 mph winds, is cold going to be a concern ?
Have you done any number crunching to get a feel for what to expect for performance ? Or is this a 'by-the-seat-of-the-pants' effort by someone who's seen one or two things before in this area ?
I gave up number crunching in favor of TLAR. Anything more complex than what you can draw on the back of an envelope probably won't work anyway. Everyone knows that a clear room exposed to sunlight will get hot. The black metal water cans (about a ton) will soak up some more and hold it for the night. If it gets too cold by morning ... add more cans. Duh! I am more worried about the other end and have some framed openings in the roof. I can screw one side of a piano hinge to the PVC and the other side to a wooden frame (claro walnut of course).
HVAC/R. My SIL works in that trade. Get used to black pipe too and coated black pipe and taped joints for gaslines underground. Lots of precharged copper too. You will learn a lot about various temerature controls too. Good luck with your new job, lots of hard work and lots of head scratching, WTF happened.
Perversely, I think if the price of fuel stayed high it might provide at least some market for the automakers (in fuel efficient cars for those well off and foolish enough to buy something new). Now, there's no reason to buy anything.
But I agree - this drop in fuel costs is really about the worst-case scenario. It pretty much guarantees we'll just ride the slope down, not even taking the obvious modest efforts that could ease the way a bit.
It's not the price that is important it is affording the price - forget the price in isolation, it just balances supply and demand - think affordability, that determines the actual flow rate! An out of work person can't afford much gasoline whatever it's price.
Post peak oil the downslope implies economic contraction - whether this is the final peak or not we are now in a post peak situation - as Westexas says a different set of rules will likely apply to the way we all live (for a while at least, and maybe a long while) - try spending a little of your day on contingency plans that you may need to enact quickly at some stage - thought costs very little.
This is exactly right. I'm not sure that this reality has started to sink in even amongst many of the readers here. This is NOT a temporary downturn, prosperity is NOT just around the corner. We might level off from time to time during the descent,in stairstep fashion (as we have discussed here previously) - that seems to me much more likely than a continuous unbroken plunge. Don't be fooled, though: these will not be the beginnings of a recovery, only a pause for breath.
I don't know how far down we'll go, or what the timetable will be. I'm focused mainly on the remainder of my lifetime - the next 2-3 decades (if I'm lucky, or maybe not so lucky!) - beyond that is of academic interest only for me. Hoping that we can avoid a total collapse for at least that long (and we may not), I am thinking that the decline could bring us down to as much as 25% of present per capita GDP. That sounds like a pessimistic scenario, but it actually could be much worse even than that. Things might drag out for a while and it take longer than that to go that low, but I am doubtful that we can operate a sustainable economy at any higher level.
That 25% of present per capita GDP sounds terrible, but consider this: that is where the USA was in 1941 (in real present dollars), right before WWII. That is also about where countries like Costa Rica, Uruguay, and Cuba are today. Life is possible at that level, good living even. The psychological adjustment would be huge, but we may very well find ourselves having to make just such an adjustment. It would be prudent to begin now.
Should we make these plans before or after we prepare for 8$ gas on 8/8/08?
Regardless of my occasional difference of opinion with Jeffrey, I think this is very sound advice. Limit your exposure to high gas prices by planning for the possibility of higher gas prices. This is very good advice. I had this debate with my CEO last night. He was telling me how much higher gas prices had cost him to fuel up his Expedition. I said "Maybe you don't need an Expedition. Maybe you need to plan for a return of high gas prices. That way you are prepared next time."
See my post above, I completely agree with that statement. I drive a 40mpg car for crying out loud. What I have a problem with is big scary silly statements like grab grandma, grandpa, your cousins and be prepared to pack in a shack and grow tomato's in the front yard to survive.
What I have a problem with is middle and upper middle class people who haven't been touched by the problem suggesting that common sense things like sharing housing with your family and growing food to cut your budget is wild-eyed radicalism. Have you visited your local food pantry lately? How many people are in line? How full are the shelves? Checked out the soup kitchens? Noticed the folks losing their homes? Had they gotten Jeff's advice ahead of time, they might not be in this situation.
Sharon
Hey! I grow tomatoes in my front yard...what of it? And I share housing with my non-nuclear family.
Frankly, you seem so sure things are not going south, you sound every bit as dogmatic as those you criticize.
You may not need to yet, but it already happening to some people. Here in relatively-less-affected Midwestern College Town USA, one of my employees was just telling me that she and her son are moving into the basement of her sister's house to reduce her utility and rent costs, share on grocery bills, and so that what she is paying in rent will help her sister (just lost her job) and brother-in-law (construction worker/no work) to try to keep making their house payments. So it may be premature hyperbole to some, but definitely not to all.
Why don't you give her a raise? Sounds like she could use it, you cheapskate.
Should I also employ her sister and brother-in-law?
EHT; Why certainly if you can use them productivly, If not the give her a 20 cent per hour raise, that would at least help a lot. Maybe that would be a bit much, $64/week, then half that would at least be something.
the old hermit
You guys jump one step into a problem and try to 'solve' it by putting the economic burden on this one employer. We're talking about a huge systemic change that's hitting our culture. It seems like EHT's employee is experimenting with how much the family can adapt to make things work.
I just remembered that one of the few pieces of Vinyl that I still carry with me is 'The Walton's Christmas' .. I think I might have to rip it down to MP3s and take a listen.
Goodnight, John-boy. Goodnight, Pa. Goodnight, Momma!
Math skills kind of rusty, old hermit?
.20 * 40 is $8.00
subtract ~25% for taxes, etc leaves about $6 / week raise
The thought is nice, but I don't think that will be a big lifestyle boost for someone living in the Midwest US.
Also, frequently at .EDUs, an immediate supervisor can't give a raise for the hell of it.
Do you have something to contribute here? You don't know what her salary is.. but you decide you can call EHT the source of a problem that [he] related to discuss this problem.
What's with you?
Antidoomer;
Maybe there's a better way to describe people who are issuing warnings than to call it fear-mongering, a term which is clearly overused and underdescribed.
I have to say that your well-established reputation for 'hit-and-run optimism' by issuing unclarified posts about possible tech-developments has probably earned you the title of 'Dream-mongering'
Either kind of 'mongering' would seem to be hollering out an ideology without evidence or reasonable backing.. but these warnings aren't unreasonable, unreasoned or unwelcomed.. WT and others provide no small amount of the evidence of smoke they are looking at before choosing to tell the other theatergoers that there might be a fire.. that it might be a good idea to find a seat closer to the exits and consider an evac plan.
Saying that it's irresponsible to consider this possibility and set up some contingency plans sounds to me like it is itself a fear response. But believe me, I understand.
"We have nothing to fear but fear itself."
People like Roubini and Mike Shedlock, and Kunstler have been warning about the financial meltdown for several years. They've been ridiculed as "fear-mongers". Amazing how prescient they have been. Has anyone called it perfectly? No, antidoomer, so get over it. I have personally made many financial decisions based on the evidence presented by the people I've mentioned above. If I had listened to the idiots at CNBC, Morgan Stanley, Chase, Paulson, and Bernanke et. al., our savings would have been absolutely wiped out. People at work now chuckle about my rantings concerning the economy, but they listen, shake their heads in agreement, and are clearly as uncomfortable about their own futures as well as I. Jeffrey, you have helped many by sharing your insights about our energy and related financial difficulties.
I have a tendency, when there is a lack of certainty, to weight the different scenarios. Unfortunately that meant I only somewhat lightened my stock and bond holdings, whereas with hindsight a wholesale retreat would have been in order. I also had the mistaken belief, that it would primarily be a catastophic fall in the dollar, and was heavily weighted in foreign equities, which have fallen even faster than US equities.....
Jeff I think we are talking weeks, ecen here in Canada. january may be a very black month as all the retailers and everything connected to them realize Christmas didn't save them. Canadian jobless numbers are matching yours. On top of that we have a cat fight going on at the federal level and none of the parties has a clue about how serious it is. All the best for you ansd your family. ELP will be mandated.
I wish people would get off the "No one knows how the future will play out" treadmill and start to approach if from a risk management(RM) basis. RM starts from the proposition that while we, indeed, can't know the future (that's why it is called risk), we can assign gross probabilities to future events, their impact and what might be done to mitigate them.
RM can be as simple as playing a "what-if" game such as: What if I lost my job? What if I couldn't find a new job for a year or more? What if inflation wiped out the value of my savings? And, so on.
It can also be used for mundane things such as: If I have to produce much of my own food, what skill sets and supplies do I need? If I produce my food, what skill sets and equipment do I need to preserve it?
This sort of "game" can obviously go on and on but it is worth it in the end.
I've been doing this sort of thing for years and taking actual action. But, what I and others like me have learned is that there are limits and it's best to determine these limits when time is not of the essence. For example, I have a couple of year's worth of fertilizer on hand. I recognize that this will eventually run out. However, it gives me time to go to Fertility Plan B.
Todd
"In the old days" -i.e. my grandma and partly mums generation- people had savings, used cash not credit and where more self reliant.
As we have got 'richer' the banks have spotted a nice little earner in enabling mountains of debt at the same time Nations molly-coddle us into thinking they will save us all. Result: zero or negative savings rates, ruinous debt levels and social/financial imprudence at every level.
IMO: WE NEED A SHOCK
If this credit crunch starts people thinking about getting a bit of a financial cushion then it will help out -what doesn't help is massive State level indebtedness, it simply shifts the debt upwards to the level of 'too big to fail'. But of course Nations can -look at Iceland, look at Zimbabwe, look at Weimar Germany.
It seems to me that all we are doing is pushing this great 'day of reckoning' a little further into our future...
Regards, Nick.
I too have concluded that a shock is the only thing that will burst the protective bubble around most people. $147 oil was a small shock...perhaps an extended bout of 10% unemployment (official figures, higher in reality) will alter how people view the world.
As Schlesinger points out in the upper-right corner of TOD, "we have only two modes — complacency and panic."
In the risk management department there is a common error which we seeem to be prone to: we forget to factor in the cost of an decision or detection error.
The probability of tshtf was maybe very small in the minds of our financial overlords ...... but it seems they never thought of the cost of being wrong ...... however improbable.
This is one reason I used financial risks as the initial starting point. For an individual/family the next areas would be water (personal, household, agriculture), medications (Will I die if I stop taking my medication), food (Am I dependent upon the food system, should some be stored and how much, can I produce any significant quantity), shelter (if push came to shove could I live in a vehicle or tent) and, finally, things like clothing, home schooling materials, etc.
Todd
The idea of living with lots of family members sounds good in theory: save money, pool resources, etc. Living in Japan, I find that things are still done this way quite a bit. Often the people who do this are at the lower socioeconomic end, running family businesses in farming, construction, fishing or a shop. Needless to say, the grandparents are a huge help with the grandkids. Without the income provided by both the working mother and father, the family couldn't make ends meet. Even though there's government run daycare here it ends around 6pm and having the grandma oick up the kids lets the mother work longer.
But as soon as people don't have to live this way they don't. Most people generally don't live together with extended family. Actually, personally, I would really not want to live with my mother-in-law. I don't hate her, actually we get along, but still I think there is a lot of intergenerational friction avoided by separate living arrangements. The older generation tends to dominate discussions on the basis of seniority and experience. It's annoying, to say the least! If there are other options they should be considered too.
The second link in your post appears to be broken. Was it this story? There's a bit more added to the end of your link.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE4B31H420081205
E. Swanson
I whole-heartedly agree with this part. Unfortunately, by the time the dust settles, we probably will not have time or energy left to hunt down the guilty, and our financial credibility in the world will already be destroyed.
The least we could do is begin by shoving a sword up Greenspan's azz to compliment his Honorary Knighthood. Preferabley, in a nice ceremony on Wall Street.
(also, thank you leanan for continuously posting updates and comments by denniger and by automatic earth - they should both be in the financial links at the left of this page, IMHO)
Yeah and the pretty people on CNBC this morning, after the number hit, said that "people leaving the workforce" in the same time period was over 400,000. How convinent of those folks to do that in light of the death march of jobs. I believe one of the examples were people going back to school. I have never seen such blatent manipulation of data.
Just to add one thought to the mix - in this economy, working conditions become harder, and some people may quit their jobs (going back to school is always a good excuse) because the strain is just too much. This is where I got to. Maybe under other conditions, the management where I worked would have been more inclined to see my requests as valid, and to see the somewhat unconventional ways I was contributing to a rich work environment. For example, I had vastly more experience as an MD, was by far the best Spanish-speaking medical provider in the clinic, etc... These qualities had been celebrated in the 90's during the internet bubble. But now, all the management could prioritize was trying to simplify their workload and increase mine.
By the way, this ultimately led to my being able to focus on the present crisis and options for transitioning this family to one of the more hopeful energy-constrained scenarios, and even blog about our transition to a local food based diet (www.ecoyear.net). I see welcoming my sister and her kids as a real possibility at some point in the future. Between my three boys and her two, we should have the food-growing manpower we need.
Retail Sales Are Weakest in 35 Years
This 6.7 % is only the official number mind you. It doesn't include people with part-time jobs, nor the ones that gave up looking for jobs.
From further down in the article:
AFAIR there are six different official unemployment levels in US stats, ranging from the narrow U-1 to the broad U-6.
The U-6 level is currently 12.2%.
[hat tip: blackswan at Mish]
The good pollyannas - sorry, people at CNBC think that this(the massive job loss) is a sign that the worst is OVER.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28069440
It's all very well to look for that elusive silver lining but I have a nasty feeling that the really bad stuff is just beginning. I think only the first 100 of the 1000 dominoes have fallen. The excesses of the past 15 years can't be wiped out in 10 months.
Srivathsa
The Holiday Shopping Season is so important for many retailers that they will do anything possible to make it to Dec. 24. After that, watch for many "out of business" signs to start popping up in the malls and on mainstreet. Seed catalogues start coming out in January, so at least all those former cashiers will have something to plan with...
For some of us, the catalogues have already begun to arrive. Totally Tomatoes and Vermont Bean both came in my mail this week. Usually, the seed catalogues start arriving closer to Christmas, so I was a little surprised, but very happy, to see these.
Just got my Fedco catalog! Pretty much the only catalog I need, though I glance through a few others now and then.
fedcoseeds.com
It does seem a tad early, but I don't mind.
You mean you just got your Fedco Catalog. [Just doing my bit to support a local co-op business.] I'm ordering early.
cfm in Gray, ME
Fedco is the absolute bomb! The best seeds and the best prices and it is a coop. Order early is right! Been a loyal fedcoite since the nineties.
CNBC sound like used car salemen to me (bad ones) always harping that they have a great deal. Much like someone trying to pawn off a Boss mustang in about 1980.
I used to say that one could probably do pretty well by just shorting whatever is featured on the cover of Money Magazine. Pretty much the same thing could be said for whatever CNBC is touting.
For the real dirt on the unemployment rate, the site to consult is John Williams' Shadow Government Statistics:
According to SGS, the current true unemployment rate is approx. 16%
http://www.shadowstats.com
No offense... but that's just bunk.
In order to get to 16% they include people who aren't working... aren't looking for work because SGS thinks they should have a job.
If I remember the last time I reviewed their work, that included those in jail, some retirees, etc.
It's reasonable to challenge government statistics (since they too have a horse in the race)... but this guy sometimes just makes it up as he goes along.
It seems reasonable to me to expect that retirees will be looking for work when their pensions are cut, then cut again. Repeat as required..
And if/when they do... they can count as unemployed if they can't find work.
See how simple that is?
Positive_Phototaxis,
Thank you for your comment, much appreciated. I confess that I haven't examined the SGS data in detail.
There is no doubt a subjective element in the definition of 'unemployment' and so the figures can to some degree be 'inflated' or 'deflated' for awareness-raising or awareness-reducing purposes respectively.
No doubt... but the accepted definitions cover the gammut pretty well without having to make things up. If you think that someone who has a job is unemployed if he has a part-time grocery job when he used to be a FT engineer... there's an existing measure for you.
But if you think that you should include people who can't work (the disabled... the incarcerated... etc.) that's just silly. The point of measuring "unemployment" is to judge the relative strength of the job market. it isn't an economic problem that someone can't work.
Heck, IIRC he even makes an adjustment for the percentage of the aduly population that he thinks should be working and counts any shortage as "unemployed". He obviously knows better than they do whether they need a job.
So what if it's not 16% now ?
But why don't we just split the difference and say the true rate currently is closer to 12%...
Doesn't the trend of that line give you any confidence that we might hit 16% in the (very near) future - I sure don't see any signs of moderation in that slope...
Hell - we'll probably give 16% a pass and go straight on to 18 or 20%.
No.
Not even close to it.
There is a minimum rate of unemployment that represents transition between jobs and a small unskilled population. It used to be that this was thought to be about 6%. We now think it's lower (say 4.5% to 5%). So the U3 unemployment attributable to the poor economy is 2% to 2.5% - That will almost certainly grow (as will the alternate measures of unemployment).... but 16% (overall)?
Highly unlikely. I'd say that the top U3 unemployment will probably be about 8-9%
Denninger's theory would go along with the "Super-Imperialism" view of history by economist Michael Hudson that I have been promoting lately. Again, the central thesis is that, for decades now, the U.S. has used its foreign and government debt as the VERY MEANS whereby to enforce dollar and general economic hegemony over the rest of the world. That would certainly help to explain Paulson's apparent attitude.
Here is a link to the reviews of the book championing this thesis at amazon. I would be grateful for some thoughtful feedback. (The book itself is unfortunately quite expensive.)
http://www.amazon.com/review/product/0745319890/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt...
Yes, but you have to remember that the "U.S." in this context isn't the standard of living of the average USA resident (far from it). Obviously, the last 25 years have been very lucrative for the extreme upper echelon. As an economy and nation, the USA once possessed actual hegemony-it was dismantled as the dismantling was a better deal for the owners of the country.
To me the really impressive thing about today's report was the massive upward adjustment of the Sept. and Oct. numbers. From 284K to 403K for Sept. and from 240K to 320K for Oct. That's a skyrocketing rise of 41% for September and 33% for October. Splitting the difference, down the road can we expect an "adjustment" for November of say 37% up to 730,000!!?? Now THAT'S an awesome number.
I'm too lazy to look back and compare but are 33% and 41% upward adjustments more or less normal or is the web of lies just bigger each month?
The percent change comparison is irrelevant (an adjustment from 20k lost to 40k lost would be 100% but would still be of little import).
The numerical adjustment is quite high. It is, however, a normal function of a declining economy (revisions tend to be downward as normal assumptions turn out to have been optimistic). You should expect upward revisions of prior months after it turns around (whenever that it).
This says as much as anything, if it is true.
"One in 10 American homeowners fell behind on mortgage payments or were in foreclosure during the third quarter as the world’s largest economy shed jobs and real estate prices tumbled. "
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a37uyBrX6dvY&refer=home
Ten percent of ALL US homeowners in trouble? That is alot of trouble, for it must include free and clear properties and old mortgages issued prior to the subprime mess. Approx one third of all homes are free and clear.
Couple this with the decline in commodity prices, and we'll be seeing a crash of farm and rural land values next spring. As I've been saying here for quite some time, rural land is way overpriced and headed for a fall. The idea may be appealing to some to sell their burb home and rush out to buy rural land, but the wiser ones will rent for awhile, if they can sell. As we seesaw through oil prices and peak, there just isn't much room for rural values.
I take it you mean that since a third of homes are free and clear, that for 10 percent of ALL HOMEOWNERS to be in trouble, then approx 1 in 6 mortgage holders are in trouble?
That's how I interpret the article. So take off the old 20 and 30 year standard mortgages, and it's even worse. It is hard to believe, that this number are either foreclosed or 30 plus days delinquent.
Not to be too cavalier, but I always wondered how so many folks could have so many items or lifestyle that seemed unaffordable, at least to my perception of their income.
As I've been saying here for quite some time, rural land is way overpriced and headed for a fall.
If you think of farm land, if it isn't overpriced then the average farmer would be in so much ag debt with no hope to ever be able to sell his way out of it when he retires?
An interesting point. First, there's a huge range in how, and how much, different producers use debt. I know of both ends. Just as an observation, it seems younger folks are more likely to get overextended in trying to build large operations. But from what I've seen, farm debt is more likely to be local, or through various farm credit services, the old PCA's. As a broad, broad brush, these lenders have worked with the producers for years, know the operation, and don't push the money at them.
And there is a completely different valuation used than what most folks will encounter when they go to buy their 40-100 ac rural spread. Here the valuations have been in the home market, that's what the seller wants, and the valuations may often be 3 or 4 or more times that as agricultural or timber land. Joe Blow may be looking to buy that 100 ac farmette fixer-upper at 4K/ac, and his commercial bank may loan on that, but it's a long ways from the perhaps 1K/ac actual value. From an ag perspective, that place will valued on the number of crop acres, and their soil and productivity. With falling commodity prices, these production based values are falling again.
This is the trap I'm afraid many will be lost in as they flee their suburban home for a go at sustainability or ELP or whatever moves them. Peak oil will destroy these high non production values, and the ag or timber values will drop also. Older farmers will pick properties up for peanuts, for once long commutes and second or vacation homes are over, no one will want them.
Thanks, one thing we can't predict is the exact timing of this transition
And as the news was announced that some 533K jobs were lost, the stock market closed up 200+ points today. Wall Street is no doubt happy that all those workers who are nothing more than costs to management are being taken off the books...perfect time to out-source that work to some folks halfway around the world who will do the jobs for chump change, with no environmental or workplace safety laws.
I think thats a tad unfair. I think whats really going on, is the market searching for capitulation, with market timers believe is a sign of a bottom. In this case, I think they are looking in vain for any positive sign.