49 comments on Rank the Top 10 Oil Stories of 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
49 comments on Rank the Top 10 Oil Stories of 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I find this current practice of disinformation by energy companies to be one of the great ironies of the day. I watched Mr Pickens on Meet the Press using every opportunity to mention that the days of fossil fuels were numbered. As soon as his segment ended, a commerical was aired with one of these Dunces speaking with great sounding authority that there was absolutely no shortage of oil - we just need to use some advanced techonolgies to have it gush forth and keep us cheerfully motoring away without a care in the world - just pay a little more for these technologies to be deployed.
How is this any different than the disinformation used by the tobacco companies in years past? How long will it take for us to ban this type of stuff? And, those great ads showing macho guys roaring about in high powered pickups just for the fun of it. I suspect that this type of propaganda is more detrimental to the health of future generations than tobacco smoking.
A number of cultural and political think tanks supported by the tobacco industry are also supported by the petroleum industry to disseminate disinformation. "Doubt is our product." said one tobacco industry executive years ago. The same is true of the petroleum industry with regard to climate change and the ongoing resource war that is consuming our own attention and resources when we need so much to be focused on sustainability.
"Big Petroleum" and "Big Tobacco" both have gained their reputations as liars through the kind of advertising and PR "astroturf" false-flag organizations they have funded for decades.
Here are some quick websites outlining some of the relationships between junk science and "Big Tobacco" and "Big Oil" (via American Petroleum Institute, etc.)
http://implants.clic.net/tony/Corner/M/870.htm
"Junk Science and the Art of Spin Doctoring especially focuses on the Cato Institute and a host of inter-related groups all funded by BT and BO -- and "Junkman" Milloy, who runs phony scientific organizations on behalf of both Big Tobacco and Big Oil.
http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2000Q3/secondhand.html
PRWatch does good work. Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber's "Toxic Sludge Is Good For You" and "Trust Us We're Experts" are must-reads for those interested in how Big Tobacco and Big Oil join with other industries to make us into absolute Dunces with regard to environmental and economic issues.
The trick played by Corporatists -- the new "Friendly Fascists" -- is to poison the stream of information and analysis that informs public discourse and shapes public opinion. This tactic was pointed out clearly by FDR's middle VP Henry A. Wallace and even "The father of public relations" Edward Bernays.
See PRWatch review on "The Father of Spin..." here:
http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/1999Q2/bernays.html
The Neocons followed up on Bernays very well. See Richard Heinberg's superb summary analysis of the NeoCons. My books are packed away right now, but I believe Heinberg gives an overview on pages 60-61 of "The Party's Over." (Can someone please check this?)
Before folks launch into Dunce-like discussion about "Conspiracy theories" I suggest that you check the analysis and information on the sites I linked to. The leading NeoCons and PR and corporate lobbyist organizations all believe very much that democracy is only a tool to help keep the rabble in line. Real decisions are made by those who already have wealth and power. This is clearly stated by Bernays and others, such as Leo Strauss, who taught a number of the NeoCons at U of Chicago -- Wolfowitz and Kristol, and others. Strauss clearly taught that people were not capable of governing themselves, and must be manipulated by a small elite.
For one online summary of Strauss:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Strauss
All of this to say that the "Top Ten Energy Stories" of each year are manipulated and massaged to reflect the current Corporatist fashions, and that any other narratives are marginalized in our culture.
Facts are decontextualized and interpreted depending on our perspective.
The key questions is this: "Is war the only answer?" You can bet that our Corporatist leadership loves war -- it is profitable and keeps them in firm control. So the causes and effects of the big story -- the Global Resource War -- will be excluded from discussion as much as possible.
Dave,
You are right, the global economy is a gigantic piracy. The word community is an oxymoron to these louts.
The analogy to the lying tobacco bums is a good one.
And then there are the head in the sand (and other places :) turkeys at public radio, public tv, and the major newspapers who play their fiddles as Rome begins to burn.
Just think of all of the young people who are starting large families, who will soon find out that all of their leaders have been lying to them.