Glad you brought up the Baltic Dry Index. Yesterday's comments included link's to Financial Sense and M. Simmons. Where Matt and Jim give the impression that there is no glut of empty ships, that every tanker is full. So what is it, Lots of full ships, or low Baltic dry, I mishear, or something in between-that the index doesn't include oil tankers?

The Baltic Dry Index measures the prices for ships that carry dry goods so it has nothing to do with oil tankers. I believe the major item carried by "dry" ships is iron ore, steel and grains. The iron ore and steel markets have been hit hard by the economic crisis.

Worldwide oil demand is down 2-4% so tankers are being paid less but there are not an implosion in prices like there is for the dry ships.

Thanks.

Come to think of it, oil is indeed a wet good, not a dry one! :)

What about coal, though? Is coal technically considered a "dry good"? (It is, after all, dry!)

I am wondering if the letter of credit problem is as much of an issue with the oil tankers as it is with the dry bulk shippers? My impression is that a lot of the tanker fleet is owned by the IOCs, is it not?

Right now there is a very high demand for tankers for storage.

According to Simmons, that's the rumour. The actual fact (according to his discussions with the tanker industry he says) is that four tankers have been booked as future storage but are not being used for that purpose yet.

Only the pirates are currently storing oil in VCCs according to Simmons.