156 comments on The Case for Higher Gas Taxes (and Lower Income Taxes)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
156 comments on The Case for Higher Gas Taxes (and Lower Income Taxes)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
How to mitigate peak oil
1) Compulsory education in High school and University on NET energy. 101 Energy and Thermodynamics.
2) Compulsory education about fertilizer. NPK 101, textbook by author Bob Shaw (Totoneila). Have you hugged your bag of NPK today?
3) Increase Efficiency across the board through strict regulation.
4) Raise consumption taxes of items that require more energy to produce through the roof. Items should be priced according to the energy they use!
5) Raise Gas taxes globally (Sure it'll guarantee a depression but do you want a depression now or a global collapse later?)
6) Make it patriotic to use less energy, to use less in general! Society should reward less.If women rewarded less, men would oblige with using less. The mess that got the world into this in the first place is competition for mates.
7) Use the taxes gathered to create a sovereign alternative energy fund and keep Robert Rapier and Nate Hagens in charge.
8) Invest in comprehensive public transport
9) Trains
10) Cut the working week to four days. Less time and energy wasted in commuting.
VK;
I appreciate the intent here, but the tone of all your suggestions comes off as some form of 'combative policy solution' It sounds like it's just gunnin' for a protracted congressional and cultural battle, of which we've seen so much already.
I think the strength in RR's proposal is that while focused and clearly directed, it is also proportional and gradual. The way you've worded some of those sounds like you're telling consumers and citizens that the 'they' in the economy is the enemy, not that we need to all join in an effort to improve our priorities.
"Compulsory, Compulsory, Tax high energy items Through the Roof"
In a time of extremes,sometimes 'Diplomacy and a Conciliatory approach' are regarded as ineffectual, weak or even a betrayal. Nobody wants to compromise.. and we don't get anywhere. Push too hard and it only inspires resistance.
Best,
Bob Fiske