Some economic news...

Japan Should Scrap U.S. Debt; Dollar May Plummet, Mikuni Says

(Bloomberg) -- Japan should write-off its holdings of Treasuries because the U.S. government will struggle to finance increasing debt levels needed to dig the economy out of recession, said Akio Mikuni, president of credit ratings agency Mikuni & Co.


Recession means hunger at holidays for many

Food assistance groups said many families who show up at their doors were recently making it on their own. But two years of rising food and energy costs ate into what little safety net those families had. Now, as jobs losses rise, many who were making ends meet can no longer do so.

"People have just been stretched to the breaking point. They have to turn to someone for help," said Karen Siebert, spokeswoman for Harvesters Community Food Network in Kansas City, which provides food for 420 food pantries in a 13-county area and has seen demand jumped 50 percent this year.


Consumers fall deeper into debt: Equifax

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. consumers are falling deeper into debt, an official at one of the largest U.S. credit bureaus told Reuters on Tuesday, as the U.S. recession deepens and job losses mount.

Leanan - why post such negative and disheartening news such as these stories. Didn't you read the John Tierney piece you posted (currently up top)? Everythings going to be alright. Resources are limitless. And humans are so smart that we can solve any problem.

"Prices do sometimes shoot up for natural resources, but people react by finding new sources and substitutes, and prices come back down." --Tierney

The Invisible Hand saveth them who truly believith in it.
Oh you of little faith ...

Thank God we found a substitute for oil this year just in time. I wonder if this theory also works for money as many people this Christmas will have to find a substitute for that.

Maybe everything is not lightness.
But, on the other hand, in the brief window that oil prices were high (2004-2008), every major auto manufacturer designed and began initial production on much higher mpg models, including the GM Volt, a true PHEV (40 miles on charge). The Ford Fusion recently obtained 53 mpg in a test by a fair LA Times auto critic.
The increase in alternative fuel research and development was dramatic as well, if less promising. Palm oil is competitive at $50 a barrel, and new hybrids bring much higher yields.
Oil was cheap for decades, then became expensive for three or four years. Now, it is cheap again, and may go down to $10. Yet, in that small window of less than four years, many large adaptations were forthcoming. World fossil oil demand had all but flatlined even before the recession.
Hard to imagine oil prices will revive for several years. Hard to imagine demand will revive for five to 10 years. This global recession looks bad.
Japan's oil demand, for example, is falling to levels not seen since the 1960s, due to conservation efforts and the recession. That's four decades of flat to down crude oil demand, but economic growth.
There is a likely scenario ahead, no great but not doom: Due to global recession and conservation, world fossil oil demand does not recover for 10 years or so. But, by then, Europe and Japan are deep into hybrids and PHEVs, and maybe even the USA. Maybe even China (where PHEVs are almost coming off production lines already).
Demand for fossil oil never recovers. 2007-2008 was the era of Peak Demand. We make progress in the business of improving the life of man, step by step, as we have done for centuries.
The price mechanism will play a large part in making this scenario a reality.

Japan's oil demand, for example, is falling to levels not seen since the 1960s, due to conservation efforts and the recession. That's four decades of flat to down crude oil demand, but economic growth.

Want to know how Japan flattened out their oil demand growth but kept up economic growth?

http://mazamascience.com/OilExport/index.html

Here's the oil demand

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

But now let's look at gas and coal.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Just from reading off the graphs and a quick estimation (someone can grab the raw data and apply conversion factors if they fancy) it looks to me as if Japan would today be importing somewhere in the ballpark of 3.5 million barrels per day more oil than at present if it hadn't substituted it with coal and natural gas. You may need to rethink some of your ideas.

Thanks Undertow, this one is a keeper. Growth in GDP, or industry in general requires growth in the energy supply. As the oil supply declines then the use of coal and natural gas must increase, just to stay static. But in a debt based society, a static economy is impossible. If there is no growth then the economy must decline.

Since we have reached peak oil, in my opinion anyway, then to avoid a never ending depression coal and natural gas use must increase quite dramatically. That is not likely to happen. Natural gas will likely peak about ten years after oil.

Coal has a different problem. As it has been pointed out, several times on TOD, the supply of coal is not really what it is cracked up to be. Also it is quite spotty. That is the supply is limited to a very few countries. I expect "Net Coal Exports" to shrink even faster than net oil exports. After the shock of peak oil sinks in to the average citizen, they will demand that their precious reserves of coal be kept for themselves.

Thats partial substitution at work. I wish someone with a better grasp of economic would take a stab at the implications of partial substitution. My own result is that it will lead to energy prices in general reaching equality with a fixed discount for energy quality.

Effectively no energy source provides any advantage over the other once the quality discount is in. The only differentiating factor is the quality which is basically the use for the energy. This includes renewable sources in this model they would be expanded to maintain the total energy levels not because they provided any inherent advantage from a energy/cost stand point. Basically they don't don't cause expansion but slow the decline in overall energy levels. This has nothing to do with how "good" renewable energy sources are just that a economic model of partial substitution ends with energy itself becoming a more unified concept i.e you start paying for joules/btu's.

I'd love to see your japan graphs with prices per btu over layed on top. You should see that partial substitution was unable to prevent energy costs from converging.

This of course brings up the current unprecedented flattening of the price differential between oil and NG worldwide and in North America esp. If this differential remains closed and the price of oil increases we are effectively entering and unknown era of converged energy costs.

In my opinion the biggest thing thats happening right now is that the advantages of partial substitution have come to and end. The economic impact of this is hard to gauge but from what I can tell its the biggest untold story in the history of modern energy.

From a EROEI perspective what this means is that using energy from coal or NG to extract oil or vice versa offers little intrinsic advantage financially. Its not clear to me yet what the full implications are of the tango between EROEI and partial substitution but the result regardless is not good and its not a small factor. Declining overall i.e total energy place a role also.

Merry Christmas and enjoy each and every holiday we have from here on out. It may be the last one you enjoy in reasonable comfort.

Thats a doomer variant of good cheer :)

Congratulations on your excellent charts. But doesn't this underline a point? That people and businesses adapt? That it is possible to progress, while using less oil? I didn't say they used less of other energy sources.
Moreover, Japan achieved these reductions in oil demand while oil was cheap.
Since Japan taxes gasoline, I assume oil demand will continue to fall in Japan, with the introduction of much higher mpg cars, such as hybrids and PHEVs.
The point stands: Several nations, largely in Europe, are obtaining higher GDPs per capita while reducing oil consumption. If France adopts PHEVs in the future, and gets more than 80 percent of its power from nukes (as it already does, and it is building yet two more huge nuke plants), does not that mark a successful adaptation to scarce oil?
I confess to not knowing the full range of outlooks for coal and natural gas, although there seems to be plenty of it, judging from prices. China just discovered yet another huge seam of it, and is building CTL plants as we speak.
Maybe fuel-switching can't last. Maybe we run out of fossil everything (though probably not nuke, solar, wind, geothermal, biofuels or gains through efficiencies). Seems like we still have a lot of options on the table.
Enough option to drive oil down to $10 in 2009? I think so. Down to $33 a barrel today, for the best grades. In the $20s for heavy stuff.
That's cheap!

Here is Japan's total energy consumption, through 2005 (EIA). From 1983 to 2005, it grew at +2.2%/year.

And that was the era of cheap energy (which is upon us again, by the way). And repeat, I said nations can prosper while using less oil, not energy. However, California has shown it can increase GDP per person while cutting energy use per unit of output.
Or, are you suggesting that all forms of energy, including fossil (coal, oil, gas, GTL, CTL, shale, tar, heavy Venezuelan guck) solar, wind, geothermal, nuke, mini-nuke, and biofuels become more scarce in decades ahead?
Seems unlikely.

"However, California has shown it can increase GDP per person while cutting energy use per unit of output."

link please?

For the last two decades a lot of Americans have confused debt with wealth. Take out the easy credit and the great speculative bubble ever known to modern capitalism - housing, and we are poorer IMHO. Debt is a disease that afflicts many in this country.

I recently suggest to a friend that there is a possibility that California will go BK in 2009. California is infested with clowns living on borrow money. The music just stopped, and the piper wants to be paid bytch!!!

Cinch

link please?

I don't know why people online think others are their research assistants.

From Berkeley,

According to the California Dept of Finance [excel file], in 1990 California's GSP was $788 billion with a population of some 30 million, and is now some $1,543 million, with a population of some 36 million.

Now I have done the research for you, you can do your own sums to figure out if the electricity per capita or per dollar of GDP has gone up or down.

If you have a claim to make, you must provide evidence. It is fair and proper in any public discourse particularly in the sciences. Here I'm asking just for a link, in particular GDP on GSP.

My opinion/view is still the same. If you take out the creative financing that has occurred in the past decade, California is actually poorer today then they were in the 90s. With massive accumulation of debt at all levels (personal to state budget), high rate of unemployment and state budget in shamble, California fictitious economic growth story for the past decade is being seen for what it is.

A few days ago Calculatedrisk.blogspot.com presented a stat of Mortgage Equity Withdraw and/or HELOC contribution to the overall economy. Their thesis is simple: take away these financial debt instruments and we never really gotten out of the 2001 recession.

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data

The folks at Shadow Government Stats also think we've never really gotten out of the recession. (Scroll down for GDP.)

I would have posted the graph, but can only hot link, which Leanan doesn't like.

Cheers

to the poster formerly known as BenjaminCole,
You may be correct, but I don't believe you are. Natural wealth per capita in the form of energy has peaked - in terms of NET energy it has most definitely peaked. We will undoubtedly use less oil because it is less affordable - there is less 'energy subsidy' circulating throughout the system and this means attempts at growth have to be borrowed from elsewhere. Oil supply will eventually (and soon, but not in 2009) go down faster than oil demand. All the other inputs are secondary. Energy gain makes (made) the world go round.

We will undoubtedly use less oil because production will decline and there won't be any other choice.

What do you mean, negative? Japan's going to save us! Woo-hoo! I'm going out to buy a flatscreen TV right now.

Pick one up for me, too, while you're out - it will help the economy.

Forget the TV. I'm going to have a tea ceremony with - and by - myself.

Aren't most LCD's made in Korea?
Sony has to source them from LG or Samsung.

Denninger http://market-ticker.denninger.net/had an interesting post a day or so ago titled We are all Madoff.

Not quite so rantish as usual, and really made a point IMO and also addressed Mr. Mikuni's views just below that post.

In spite of this, or maybe because of it, I say Merry Christmas to all.

Bob

Notice that Mr. Tierney (See: Science Adviser’s Unsustainable Bet) did not talk about production/export numbers?

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/47541
A simple explanation for oil prices

. . . despite the fact that relative to 2005, we are going to almost certainly see three years of lower net oil exports, flat crude oil production and a slight increase in total liquids production, the conventional wisdom is that the increase in annual US oil prices from $57 in 2005 to about $100 in 2008 was due to “speculation,” while the recent sharp decline in monthly and daily oil prices was due to Peak Oilers being wrong about a near term peak in world oil production.

I think 1996 was the final production peak for Indonesia. Here are the net export numbers per day, by year for Indonesia, along with remaining post-1996 cumulative net export capacity (EIA)

1996: 780,000 bpd & 100%
1997: 665,000 & 78%
1998: 710,000 & 56%
1999: 605,000 & 37%
2000: 493,000 & 21%
2001: 356,000 & 10%
2002: 214,000 & 3%
2003: 102,000 & 0%

Note the illusion of the 1998 increase in net exports (happy days are here again!). The reality was that their remaining cumulative net export capacity fell from 78% to 56% in one year (22 percentage points, one fifth of their remaining net export capacity in only one year)--when their net export rate went up year over year.

This is obviously analogous to the possible slight increase in net exports from the top five net exporters in 2008, to a level well below their 2005 rate (happy days are here again!).

Well, see!! Obviously, exports went down because importing countries found substitutes. The U.S.A. has found a substitute for oil; it's called a depression.

Note that at the end of 1998, Indonesia's annual net export rate was only down by 9% from 1996, but they had exported 44% of their post-2004 cumulative net exports.

We are seeing similar (estimated) numbers for Mexico. Their 2006 production was down by 16% from 2004, but I estimate that they had already exported, by the end of 2006, close to half of their post-2004 cumulative net exports

And I have no doubt you could do this with any number of post peak countries, including the U.S.

Notice that Mr. Tierney (See: Science Adviser’s Unsustainable Bet) did not talk about production/export numbers?

And this is because for Mr. Tierney and all those who believe in "the free market" price is the determiner of reality, not supply or demand. Ever notice that the economists classic supply and demand chart shows both as a range? And it is only price that is solved for?

If I start from the belief in Santa Claus, I do not try to explain gravity, I explain why reindeer aren't limited by it.

Based on Deffeyes' estimate, since 2005 we have burned through about 8% of remaining conventional crude oil reserves.

My guesstimate is that since 2005 we have burned through about 20% of remaining conventional cumulative net oil exports.

Oil is a commodity, and commodity prices are always volatile. It is quite possible to be absolutely right about the long term trend for a commodity and still lose your shirt in the short term. . . Fortunately Mr. Simmons was wise enough to only make a token bet.

Right, the jolly old guy dressed in red will be coming in on his flying sleigh later today, here to bail us out from his limitless resource bag.

Didn't you hear? Santa himself is looking to Congress to bail his operations out. (Seems that transition to high tech toys is causing problems with the elves). You can find the hearings on you tube. I'd include a link, but I'm at work and you tube is blocked.

Hope his flux capacitor doesn't run out of juice before he finishes his rounds. John

There's going to come a day, not too far in the future, when we'll all be hoping and praying that Santa leaves us a big lump of coal in our stockings because that's the only way we'll get cheap fossil fuels.

TS

On a more serious note. Mikuni's publicly floating his concerns about the U.S. governments ability to find buyers for debt is truly sobering. It makes Don's prediction of a Fed financed debt all the more likely. I guess the equation is simple, just how much in trasuries can you float if the return is 0 or even negative? Even the most frightened of investors will eventually start looking for someplace else to park their money (like in the mattress).

Yes. Obviously, if Japan ever takes the ludicrous step he advises (forgiving all the debt) the USA won't be borrowing money externally in the near to medium future. Which means USA consumers won't be buying Japanese products-he hasn't thought this one out at all. A logical choice to weaken the Yen would be an absolutely massive Japanese income tax cut.

While I am not an expert in Japanese culture, my general impression is that it is pretty rare for one to come right out and say directly what one thinks. Thus, I am inclined to interpret this message more like this:

"We know that the US economy is going down the tubes and that the US dollar and US treasury securities will soon be worthless. Most countries in your situation would simply default, and then creditors like we Japanese would then have to write off our holdings of US currency and treasuries. We understand, however, that those in high places in the US must save face, and thus cannot formally default. We understand, and thus will simply proceed with our write offs AS IF you had already formally defaulted."

Of course, this means that the US can expect to fare just about as well as any other defaulting country going forward.

I'm more inclined to think that Japan is actually speaking obliquely to China. The forgiveness of debt policy wouldn't work without China's complicity, which is unlikely to be forthcoming. I think this may have been an opening gambit to enter public discussion about the prospect of default and its potential impact on major US debt holding nations.

Just my theory, though.

Sharon

"We know that the US economy is going down the tubes and that the US dollar and US treasury securities will soon be worthless. Most countries in your situation would simply default, and then creditors like we Japanese would then have to write off our holdings of US currency and treasuries.

Exactly. How anyone could have been advising others to pile into treasuries and cash is beyond me. U.S. debt levels are phenomenally huge. It is not hard to see that it will never be paid back. Most American politicians probably don't realize this. But I can't say the same for their Japanese and Chinese counterparts.

At some point, a creditor nation is going to say 'no more'. It's inevitable.

Being debt free is grossly over rated. That the Japanese who have a larger multiple of GDP in debt would force the issue seems rather odd to me. They had best look in the mirror if they want to criticize government debt.

If Treasuries become worthless that would mean that the dollar dropped also IMO. In such a situation, U.S. exports theoretically would expand dramatically and imports would fall since a worthless dollar can't buy very much. The combination of the two theoretically would restore the value of the dollar.

Those who dis the dollar are blowing smoke. What currency is a better store of value? The Euro which has no country backing it at all? Hardly. The Yen? Japan has been in near perpetual recession going on over 20 years. It produces none of its own oil. And now one of its main customers is in a severe recession. And the rest of the world's currencies lack liquidity for the sums that are used in trade.

In a fiat money system with fractional banking we know that if there is no debt there is no money. That is why Paulson and Bernanke are in a panic to reliquify the credit markets. That is why the unheard of sum of $700 billion was conjured up almost overnight and dropped from a helicopter.

Debt is money and debt is a hedge against inflation. The important thing about debt is that one must be careful not to take on more payments than one can handle. And one should keep a large supply of cash available, even if it is borrowed, to make payments if things go wrong. In the government's case this is not a problem since its computers can create money at the speed of light.

Those who want to live debt free are condemning themselves to a lower standard of living since there is no means to finance projects, private or public, which will overtime pay for themselves and the cost of the debt. I have seen many take pride in collecting rent receipts for example and being debt free. But those who took on debt to buy a house end up better off in the long run even if they have to tough it out during periods of declining house prices.

You know things are bad when even the casinos can't make money...

November casino revenue down 7.6%

Biloxi — Revenue was down for the third straight month at Coast casinos, yet the numbers were better than in many areas of the country.

So much for gambling being recession-proof.

Americans keep tighter grip on cash

More signs of economic trouble: Personal spending drops for 5th straight month. Personal income sinks. Orders for big-ticket items also fall.


Hmmm. I wonder how these people feel about Japan bailing us out?

Report: More elderly Japanese turn to petty crime

TOKYO, Japan (CNN) -- Beset by economic worries and loneliness, elderly Japanese are turning to petty crime in increasing numbers, the nation's Justice Ministry reports.

... SPUJ recently allowed CNN to follow its security team at one Tokyo grocery store. In just moments, they nabbed a 69-year-old woman, allegedly trying to steal food worth about $10.

One hour later, officers stopped a second suspect, an 80-year-old man. He had enough money to pay for all of his groceries, but security officers said he tried to leave the store without paying for medicine for an upset stomach.

"I'm so sorry," he told officers. "I live alone. My wife is in the hospital."


But lo, it's a Festivus miracle! CSS's son can have Mother's Cookies again:

Shuttered bakery reopens, rehires workers

ASHLAND, Ohio (CNN) -- An Ohio bakery shut down in October is bustling again, with 60 eager employees who had expected a Christmas on the unemployment rolls.

Some 300 workers lost their jobs when the Archway cookie factory in Ashland, Ohio, was suddenly closed by the private equity firm that owned it. The workers also were left without benefits like health insurance.

Thanks for the info Leanan! We still have about 10 bags of Mother's cookies, but I think I want to patronize this Lance company. Guess I'll be donating cookies...

"When it promised to reopen the bakery, Lance gave all 300 former Archway workers a $1,500 prepaid debit card."

Can't wait to tell my son!