![]() | Some Thoughts on the Obama Energy Agenda from the Perspective of Net Energy | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: February 10, 2009 | ![]() |
16 comments on USA Gulf of Mexico Oil Production Forecast Update
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
16 comments on USA Gulf of Mexico Oil Production Forecast Update
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
- The US stimulus and "green jobs" for wind energy
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 13th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The most recent information I got about Jack (Chevron) was that they have an estimated 500 million barrels of oil there, and there are an estimated 15 billion barrels in the Lower Tertiary trend.
There are new deep water drilling rigs being built, however the cost of oil is as low as to inhibit activity in the deepwater GOM. Production is also inhibited by increased taxation (the Federal govt. reneging on leasing agreements initially in place to stimulate interest in very expensive deep water projects, claiming they gave the corporations unfair advantage), credit crisis (more people need to borrow than there are available lenders), drilling rig shortages, and the aforementioned hurricanes.
Rainy -- Lots of optimism about the Lower Tertiary especially moving westward. But, as usual, I'll throw in the qualification that those are exploration estimates. Which means possible reserves...not proven...not even probable. Could be even more but all trends eventually come to an end. As far as rig shortages the future there depends greatly on Petobras' access to future capital IMO. They currently have a lot of floating rigs tied up (including 80% of the rigs capable of drilling in 3000 m water depth or greater). I think most now have a good feel for the oil patch cycles (highs/lows in crude prices/drilling costs, etc) and the associated lag times so we don't need to throw that around much anymore. Normally activity cycles in Deep Water are much longer then the onshore plays but I'm starting to see that differential close up some especially in the GOM (and sending me back to the house or over seas by this summer). It's difficult to change DW time lines too quickly but I've recently seen some fairly quick responses in the GOM.
An aside: PEMEX has 2 or 3 new drill ships scheduled for delivery in the next 12 months or so. They are at least a decade behind the US in exploring their section of the DW GOM. They haven't yet offered any indication of where they plan to deploy them but some folks speculate it may be towards the far western potential edge of the Lower Tertiary. If true this could go a long way towards either tempering or expanding expectations about the play in the next several years.
As far as the eastern GOM that's the real wild card IMO. Though there had been a good bit of unsuccessful drilling in the Destine Dome area some 25+ years ago exploration techniques have improved significantly. Also, most of this area is on trend with the very significant (but very mature) oil plays of Miss and Al. This would be a carbonate (reef+) reservoir play as compared to the sandstone reservoir plays of the Lower Tertiary and central and western shelf areas. This is both good news and bad: difficult to explore but billion barrel fields are certainly possible. For the last 10 years operators have been developing the far western edge of this play just to the east of the Mississippi River delta. It would be very easy (and legitimate) for the explorationists to speculate about 10’s of billions of BO out there. But, again, that only offers a reason to spend some $’s poking around there and not numbers to apply to future production rates estimates IMO.
And another Hubbert reminder. In 1956, Hubbert found that a one-third increase in projected Lower 48 URR, from 150 Gb to 200 Gb, an increase of 50 Gb, only postponed the projected Lower 48 peak by five years.