HI Ace,
One of the reasons the MMS estimates for GOM oil are so high is that they've increased the UUR to 60%, which you can see at

http://www.mms.gov/offshore/

This is completely unrealistic by a factor of 2 or 3. I've got a question about the 1999 assessment you list above. In it, they talk about 4,658 pools (pg 148 of the PDF) of oil in about 50 plays and 876 to 924 fields. I've been trying to get a map of where the pools and field are supposed to be to estimate the number of rigs that would be required (cost and timescale) to recover the oil. Have you any idea about their distribution and how many rigs and wells it would take to tap into the supposed reserves? I’ve filed a FOIR because they have been unresponsive.

I don't think we have a good answer as to why MMS has produced what seem to be such unrealistic production estimates. It seems like the likely reason was that this was the politically desired outcome. It was in 1998 that the IEA (the international organization) made its projection of world oil supply that took into account peak oil considerations. When the USA came up with its optimistic estimates of remaining reserves (not just in the Gulf of Mexico, but in the world as a whole), the IEA dropped its comments about peak oil in its forecasts, and made forecasts based solely on demand. The US EIA has produced optimistic forecasts as long as one can remember, and the high reserve numbers may have helped support these forecasts.