![]() | Some Thoughts on the Obama Energy Agenda from the Perspective of Net Energy | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: February 10, 2009 | ![]() |
16 comments on USA Gulf of Mexico Oil Production Forecast Update
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
16 comments on USA Gulf of Mexico Oil Production Forecast Update
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
HI Ace,
One of the reasons the MMS estimates for GOM oil are so high is that they've increased the UUR to 60%, which you can see at
http://www.mms.gov/offshore/
This is completely unrealistic by a factor of 2 or 3. I've got a question about the 1999 assessment you list above. In it, they talk about 4,658 pools (pg 148 of the PDF) of oil in about 50 plays and 876 to 924 fields. I've been trying to get a map of where the pools and field are supposed to be to estimate the number of rigs that would be required (cost and timescale) to recover the oil. Have you any idea about their distribution and how many rigs and wells it would take to tap into the supposed reserves? I’ve filed a FOIR because they have been unresponsive.
I don't think we have a good answer as to why MMS has produced what seem to be such unrealistic production estimates. It seems like the likely reason was that this was the politically desired outcome. It was in 1998 that the IEA (the international organization) made its projection of world oil supply that took into account peak oil considerations. When the USA came up with its optimistic estimates of remaining reserves (not just in the Gulf of Mexico, but in the world as a whole), the IEA dropped its comments about peak oil in its forecasts, and made forecasts based solely on demand. The US EIA has produced optimistic forecasts as long as one can remember, and the high reserve numbers may have helped support these forecasts.