119 comments on Use of USA Forests for Home Heating - Can this Sensibly be Expanded?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
119 comments on Use of USA Forests for Home Heating - Can this Sensibly be Expanded?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Actually, I think that wood pellets might be more of a "macro solution".
My wood burning experience has shown me that firewood use is closely tied to the type of stove. By that I mean that one uses wood which is cut to fit the particular stove. I would cut my wood into 20" slices, whereas my friend would cut his to mo more than 17" length. My neighbor wants his cut to less than 13". In short, there is no uniform size for firewood, no "one size fits all" as with fossil fuels. with oil, we have a few very clearly defined types, be it gasoline or diesel for transport, #2 heating oil for homes, kerosene or propane. These fuel divisions have allowed common technologies to evolve into highly refined systems. With firewood, a similar single type would be that found with pellet stoves.
BTW, pellets can be made from many biomass sources such as switchgrass, not just wood. Thus, pellet stoves might represent the best solution for the "one size fits all" problem.
E. Swanson
By chance, I just heard a discussion two weeks ago of switchgrass pellets vs. wood pellets. Apparently switchgrass pellets have a dramatically higher ash (mineral) content, on the order of 10-20%, than wood (0.5-1%). Because of this, it's not advisable to use switchgrass pellets in stoves that are designed specifically for wood pellets, as they may "gum up the works" with the much higher ash load. So even in the pellet world, there are compatibility issues.