44 comments on A Few Thoughts on US Petroleum Demand, Inventories, and Prices
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
44 comments on A Few Thoughts on US Petroleum Demand, Inventories, and Prices
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Politics and Peak Energy
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Electric cars an 'attractive proposition' for Australia
- Electric Vehicles: The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Very interesting post, I appreciate all the work you do on this site.
My take is that in Q2&308, when there were arguments that the economy was still expanding a little but oil price went far above normal, people drove and flew less, even to the point that consumption in aug/sep was less than what was/is normal for winter months. IMO it was the shock of high prices, and not recession, that pushed down gasoline demand.
The recession is much more clearly with us now but oil price is under a year ago, accordingly gasoline consumption is back on track with what is normal. Assuming oil stays under 80/b or so then IMO gasoline demand will continue in line with traditional usage, e.g. 2007. However, vacationers and business people alike will cut travel expenditures, meaning that jetfuel will continue sharply down.
Most of the cutback in gasoline demand has been the US, which e.g. saw a much higher proportional increase in price than europe on account of our low taxes. Growth continues in some parts of the world, china (maybe), and the persian gulf. Tata is about to begin sales of the nano* car for $2500. IMO we will not see shrinking demand and low price regardless of the recession. As WT says, price and demand declined in only one GD year, 1930, both rising briskly thereafter... and there was no hint of PO in those days. IMO the down year was 2008.
Also note that Henry Groppe thinks price will double this year.
Regarding refiners, their crack spreads have been vanishingly small, almost no profit at all. It makes sense to produce less until prices rise sufficiently to justify running their expensive facilities.
* http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/tata-nano-the-worlds-cheapest...
In the 1979-1984 recession, vehicle fuel efficiency increased 2.8% a year until 1992( according to Stuart Staniford).This was with low prices for the decade, so VMT continued to increase faster than 2.8%. If OPEC can return prices to $100 barrel, we would expect to see about 3% ( or more) increase in fuel economy AND perhaps very little VMT increase. If fuel oil also continues to be replaced by NG or electricity, the US may well have peaked in oil consumption( demand).
Rapid and wide-spread adoption of PHEV and EV's would be the last nail in the coffin for oil consumption, but OPEC may still be able to control price if non-OPEC supplies decline quickly, and a PHEV transport economy would be able to tolerate much higher than $4/gallon prices, probably more like $20/gallon prices( in today's $$).
A large PHEV fleet will be very elastic in consumption relative to gasoline price, taking extra care to top up battery charge if prices high, making more shorter trips, not being too particular if prices are low using gasoline as a convience.
It could be a win-win for OPEC, and OECD economies and reduce the decline rate so that prices stay high but NOT spike to $1000/barrel.