81 comments on Gas Crisis Raised in UK Parliament
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
81 comments on Gas Crisis Raised in UK Parliament
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Interesting. I just found this:
http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/843209
Note reserves values are all higher than Jean's.
; Russia
* Urengoy gas field (385 TCF; 10,200×109m³)
* Yamburg gas field (198 TCF; 5,242×109m³)
* Bovanenkovskoe field (166 TCF; 4,400×109m³)
* Zapolyarnoye gas field (132 TCF; 3,500×109m³)
* Shtokman field (113 TCF; 3,000×109m³)
* Arctic field (104 TCF; 2,762×109m³)
* Astrakhanskoye field (102 TCF; 2,711×109m³)
* Medvezhye field (83 TCF; 2,200×109m³)
* Yurubchen (73.7 TCF; 2,100×109m³)
* Kharasoveiskoye field (62.5 TCF; 1,900×109m³)
* Orenburgskoe field (62.5 TCF; 1,900×109m³)
* Kovykta field (62.5 TCF; 1,900×109m³)
* Kyrtael field (60 TCF; 1,600×109m³)
* Sakhalin-III (49 TCF; 1,300×109m³)
* Chayandinskoye field (46.8 TCF; 1,240×109m³)
* Angaro-Lenskoye field (46 TCF; 1,220×109m³)
* Central-Astrakhan field (45 TCF; 1,200×109m³)
* Leningradskoye field (40 TCF; 1,050×109m³)
* Yuzhno-Russkoye field (35 TCF; 1,000×109m³)
* South-Tambey field (35 TCF; 1,000×109m³)
* Krusenstern field (34 TCF; 960×109m³)
* North-Tambey field (35 TCF; 929×109m³)
* Kharampurskoye field (32 TCF; 825×109m³)
* Pestsovoe field (30 TCF; 800×109m³)
* Rusanovskoye field (30 TCF; 779×109m³)
* Utrenneye field (28 TCF; 747×109m³)
* Malyginskoye field (28 TCF; 745×109m³)
* Yurkharovskoye field (26 TCF; 740×109m³)
* Harvutinskoye field (26 TCF; 700×109m³)
* North-Urengoy field (21 TCF; 600×109m³)
* Ledovoe field (19 TCF; 500×109m³)
* Samburg field (19 TCF; 500×109m³)
* Sakhalin-II (18.8 TCF; 500×109m³)
* Kamennomysskoye field (19 TCF; 500×109m³)
* Sakhalin-I (17.1 TCF; 484×109m³)
* Tasiyskoye field (16.6 TCF; 440×109m³)
* Yamsoveiskoye gas field (15 TCF; 436×109m³)
* East-Tarkosalinskoye field (15 TCF; 400×109m³)
* Aneryahinskoye field (15 TCF; 400×109m³)
* Gubkinskoye field (15 TCF; 400×109m³)
* Vuktyl (14.7 TCF; 390×109m³)
* Beregovoe field (12.2 TCF; 324×109m³)
* Yubileynoye field (12.2 TCF; 323×109m³)
* Hvalynskoye field (12.2 TCF; 322×109m³)
* Tarkosalinskoye (12.2 TCF; 321.5×109m³)
* North-Kamennomysskoye field (12 TCF; 310×109m³)
* Ety-Purovskoye Field (11 TCF; 300×109m³)
* Vyngapurovskoye field (11 TCF; 290×109m³)
* Nahodkinskoe field (10 TCF; 275×109m³)
* Pelyadkinskoe field (9.5 TCF; 255×109m³)
* Lyantorskoye field (9.4 TCF; 250×109m³)
* West-Astrakhan field (9.4 TCF; 250×109m³)
* Severo-Stavropolskoye field (8.6 TCF; 229×109m³)
* Nurminskoye field (8.4 TCF; 223×109m³)
* Ludlovskoye field (8 TCF; 220×109m³)
* Geophisicheskoye field (7.9 TCF; 210×109m³)
* Verhneviluchanskoye field (7.9 TCF; 209×109m³)
* Minkhovskoye field (7.8 TCF; 208×109m³)
* Novo Portovskoye field (7.5 TCF; 200×109m³)
* Yen-Yahinskoye field (7.5 TCF; 200×109m³)
* West-Siyakhinskoye field (7.2 TCF; 190×109m³)
* North-Komsomolskoye field (7.1 TCF; 186×109m³)
* Sredne-Tyugskoye field (6.2 TCF; 165×109m³)
* Soletsko-Khanaveyskoye field (5.8 TCF; 155×109m³)
* Layavozhskoye field (5.3 TCF; 140×109m³)
* Gydanskoye field (4.4 TCF; 116×109m³)
* Tas-Yuryakhskoye field (4.2 TCF; 112×109m³)
* Hancheiskoye field (4.2 TCF; 111×109m³)
* Verhnetiuteyskoye field (4.2 TCF; 110×109m³)
* Vyngayahinskoye field (4.0 TCF; 107×109m³)
* Myldzhinskoye field (3.8 TCF; 100×109m³)
* Messoyakha Gas Field (3.8 TCF; 100×109m³)
Euan,
What is the total of all the fields you listed above?
I've not added up yet. Need to cross check their views on fields we know about from OECD. It will be interesting to start summing from bottom to see how far up the list you get to get an Urengoy.
Another point I would note here is that Bakhtiari considered Russian gas claims for undeveloped fields to be grossly exaggerated.
On undeveloped fields in particular, see Investor Village CWEI, messages #s 71577, 74013 and 74021, which critically review IHS data on the top 50 gas fields outside North America by reputed reserve volume. See http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=2234&pt=m
My article "Largely About Access," posted on Energy Bulletin for January 14 also gives reasons for thinking that the global gas peak, at least in terms of availability to end-users, is virtually upon us. See http://www.energybulletin.net/node/47669
Euan, do you know that according to Russian law, information about total reserves of oil in Russia and in large "strategic" oil fields is considered state secret. Because of it, foreign top managers of oil companies have problems with access to some data of their own companies. Curiously, natural gas is not covered under this law. I think, it is because Gazprom holds all information anyway, and the company can control what data can become public.
Either way, we know nothing about true amounts of oil and gas in Russia. And those who know can't speak.
That is why I think that the logistic (HL) method is an invaluable tool for giving us a plausible estimate for the URR (oil) in a region. Here is our Khebab/Brown (HL based) estimate for the outlook for Russian total liquids production from mature basins. The projected initial 10 year decline rate is shown. In January, 2006, after looking at Khebab's modeling work, I said that I expected to see the Russian oil production decline resuming within one to two years, although my estimated decline rate was too high. The projected range of decline rates shown on this graph is probably more accurate:
http://www.theoildrum.com/files/image013.png
I like your model, but we cannot deny the possibility of positive surprises. Every year the Ministry of Natural Resources take a few oil/gas/ore licenses out of the black box and auction them off. What is in that black box is everybody's guess. Also, it's hard to distinguish an oil field discovered last year and one discovered in Soviet times and put on hold. And in Soviet times we employeed pretty unique techniques of exploration like seismic imaging with nuclear blasts (total 39 explosions for that purpose).