31 comments on Simmons: Energy Optimists vs Energy Pessimists (and Understanding EIA Data)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
31 comments on Simmons: Energy Optimists vs Energy Pessimists (and Understanding EIA Data)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I wonder if Matt's post isn't like some of the EIA talks I heard by economists. We made Hypothesis A, B, and C. (The price run up and decline was caused by speculators; the price run up and decline was caused by companies acting as oligopolists. etc.) None of them worked. I think all it proves is that the approach being suggested isn't right, or perhaps isn't being measured correctly. It doesn't seem like it gets Matt very far.
I think I agree with you on the second point, but many disagree. Why spend trillions on wind turbines and other infrastructure that is expensive and may not last very long. We just have to power down from perhaps a bit higher, but on a steeper slope.
Hello;
Long time reader, first time poster. While I agree that society needs to power down, I think Matt realizes this also. In many speeches, I have heard him say that his big worry was true oil shortages. While most people on this site realize that our “Just In Time” world leaves us vulnerable to many single points of failure, the average person just assumes things will be BAU. Most cities have only about a week’s worth of food on hand. Things could get real ugly real fast if the transport trucks stopped because of fuel shortages. How many meals are we away from collapse?
I think Matt wants to make people realize that things are bad and are going to get worst. The problem is that nobody truly believes him. They are hoping for some miracle solution that will allow BAU. The problem is how do you get people to face problems they don’t know exist and they feel powerless to change?
All solutions for alternate energy will take decades to make a real difference to society as a whole. How do we get from here to there? How do we convince people and governments that we need radical change? Remember it is not only the king who shoots the bearer of bad news. I know, I have the scars to show for trying to talk to people. I have lost more than a few good friends when I tried to talk to them about the coming problems. I now only say that “I will be damn if I give the greedy oil companies one penny more than I have to.” This is acceptable but all talk of oil shortages is not.
I think Matt is trying to change the “Happy days are here again” attitude by harping on the aging workforce and rusting assets. This is a message that is not too far out in left field for most of his audiences but he still is mentioning that there no magic Shangri-La of oil that will save our behinds.
I don’t blindly accept everything Matt says but I respect his attempt to get people to stand up and take a clear look at our energy situation. It is blacker than Matt lets on but it would only turn off the audience and they would stop listening if he was talking about how bad things are really going to get.
I think we can power society down and it does not have to be a collapse but only if we have very great leaders. So I guess it is time to find a quiet hidey hole. :)
I really enjoy the web site, lots great information. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for your thoughts, Peter. You make some good points. Matt works hard at what he does. We probably see so much of Matt that we become more critical than we should be.
Matt is one of the peak oil greats, along with Deffeyes, Campbell, and several others. There's no disrespect in disagreeing and questioning them on this or that. In that sense, there's nothing wrong in being critical (or getting criticized in turn for that matter!)