![]() | Drumbeat: April 16, 2009 | The Oil Drum | Further Evidence of the Influence of Energy on the U.S. Economy | ![]() |
17 comments on The 2009 EIA Energy Conference: Day 2
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
17 comments on The 2009 EIA Energy Conference: Day 2
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“So one may almost say that the theory of universal suffrage assumes that the Average Citizen is an active, instructed, intelligent ruler of his country. The facts contradict this assumption.”
—James Bryce (1909, 35)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Another problem with Li-ion cars is that, apart from being very heavy, the batteries spectacularly explode in the event of a fire (such as a car-crash). That's what I heard on the bbc yesterday at least. Some people in Japan are working on some other battery that supposedly will be a lot less heavy and explosive. Sorry I can't remember details but the UK health authorities still work to the "scientific consensus" that I'm not really being poisoned by the mercury in my mouth.
Keep in mind that gasoline cars have a well-documented history of explosion risk. It's not all that clear why batteries would be more dangerous than gallons of gasoline. The amount of energy involved is far lower (a fully-charged EV battery has 50kWh, which is the energy equivalent of just 1.5 gallons of gasoline), and it should be much simpler to engineer safety systems around non-moving solid objects than around a constantly-circulating fluid.
You're making a claim that you don't have nearly enough evidence to back up. You're stating as fact something that has never actually happened. Moreover, you're thinking of thermal runaway, which has caused some laptop batteries to burst into flames. That's got nothing to do with external shock (like a car crash), and is generally a problem with faulty manufacturing rather than external heat.
EDIT: it seems like the battery chemistries which are being considered for the Volt are intrinsically safer, and material properties (such as cells that tear rather than exploding under pressure) are being used to lower risk.
I think the informal law of unintended consequences always remains a consideration. Someone has to point out potential risks otherwise they might not get considered. A designer might add something to the the electro-chemistry to make it more safe but then it might not be as efficient. These are all things that go into optimization trade-offs.