173 comments on Russia's Unique SVBR-100 Nuclear Reactor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
173 comments on Russia's Unique SVBR-100 Nuclear Reactor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them.”
—Henry Ford
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Quite interesting from a theoretical POV, and this design may see widespread use post-2050 (i.e. solve issues that are not immediate today).
The rate of scale up with a novel technology posted in this article ignores Mr. Murphy and the rest of reality. Almost all new technologies have unexpected issues and problems.
What if these new reactors work, but they cost twice as much to build and operate as PWRs ? What if their operating cycle is less predictable ? Et5c.
PWR & BWRs have a 60 year head start, hard to overcome.
Best Hopes anyway for a "promising" technology,
Alan
This is an issue with any new technology at this point in time. No matter how good it is, it will take time to shake out all of the problems, and other technologies will have a head-start. During the shake-out period, it is usually best not to replicate the technology in huge numbers, since it is likely that the initial version of the technology will be sub-optimal.
In a way, it would be better if this technology (or any new technology) were being tried in several places around the world, all of whom shared their experiences with each other. With something very expensive to make and test, this is difficult to do.
The technology being used in the SVBR-100 was developed over many years as the Russians mastered the challenges of working with the lead-bismuth coolant which is very corrosive. The key to their successes and their confidence in that technology is based on the development of systems that maintain careful control over the oxygen level that is present in the coolant. For information on this see Chapter 4 (Chemistry Control and Monitoring Systems) in Handbook on Lead-bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-hydraulics and Technologies.(OECD 2007 - NEA No. 6195)