![]() | EuroElections 2009 : EPP-ED | The Oil Drum | Using Thermodynamics to (Re)Examine Environmental Kuznets Curves | ![]() |
59 comments on EPA Seeks Comments on 15% Ethanol Blend
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
59 comments on EPA Seeks Comments on 15% Ethanol Blend
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“To be thrown upon one's own resources, is to be cast into the very lap of fortune; for our faculties then undergo a development and display an energy of which they were previously unsusceptible.”
—Benjamin Franklin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
So the enemy of your enemy is your friend?
Your logic does not add up, nor do any of the above links say anything about ethanol. Corn based ethanol still has low EROEI, contributes to water pollution and water depletion, probably is worse than gasoline as far as CO2 production, and is a drain on the federal budget due to subsidies. And you still like it?
Naah..more like "it take's one to know one".
Bryce makes his living attacking energy independence which is at odds with his free-market scamming.
Ethanol is hardly a scam. It is $1.615 per gallon or $2.42 per GGE. The cost of straight gasoline is $2.16 in Missouri, which is about 12% more in cost currently.
Ethanol is a substitute for gasoline for roughly the same price. Ethanol reduces smog which is formed when there is a lack of oxygen in the fuel and makes carbon monoxide poison.
The other oxygenate MTBE was banned as it caused serious groundwater contamination. Congress wouldn't give the oil companies liability insurance for MTBE leaks in 2005.
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/rfg.htm
What price do you put on clean air or at least reducing the levels of CO in the air? Zero?
What price do you put on CO2? Zero?
Corn ethanol produces about 84% of the GHG of gasoline in GGEs(including land use issues) according to the Lisa Jackson, head of the USEPA.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/05/tech/main4992574.shtml
Big Oil gets a blender's credit 51 cents to put ethanol in their gasoline but this is up for renewal in 2010. For E10 fuel that amounts to 5 cents per gallon subsidy or about $ 7 billion dollars (based on 140 billion gallons of gasoline). Oil companies also gets subsidies from the government of around $15 billion dollars from 2.2 billion barrels of oil thru production leases, etc.
http://www.eenews.net/public/Greenwire/2009/02/26/3
If you want to get rid of all Big Oil's subsidies, that's fine with me but you'll have to guarantee that the urban smog won't come back.
As far as EROEI goes it takes 100 barrels of oil energy to make 85 boe of gasoline whereas it takes 100 boe of fossil fuel to make 134 boe of ethanol.
As far as water use goes it takes 2.5 gallons of water to make a gallon of gasoline while it takes 6 gallons of water to make corn ethanol in Iowa, Minnesota 19 gal. Nebraska and California use a lot more gallons of water per gallon of ethanol. I suggest that to save water those states go to cellulosic ethanol. If 10 gallons of water per gal. ethanol were could produce 100 billion gallons of ethanol, that would be a 1 trillion gallons of water. Lake Meade can hold 9 trillion gallons of water. There's plenty of water, IMO.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-04/uom-mep041309.php
As far as the Natural Resource Defense Council is concerned
ethanol is worth the energy.
http://www.nrdc.org/air/transportation/ethanol/ethanol.pdf
MANY of the opponents of ethanol are big business fronts like
the WSJ and Bryce's Energy Tribune(run by Economides, THE Peak Oil skeptic).
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119621238761706021.html
http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=979
http://www.robertbryce.com/node/143
"Everybody hates ethanol" [at the WSJ]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123716798764436701.html
That's a clue to what's really going on.