I think preserving future resources is a total non-starter. We need the current built infrastructure of oil pipelines and refineries to do anything with the oil; we also need trained workers. If we drill less now, we close our pipelines earlier, and we have less possibility of doing more in the future.

I don't see weaning off of our addiction as an issue. Financial crises are likely to make our ability to continue buying the huge amount of foreign oil that we have purchased in the past a non-starter. We won't be weaned off oil; our supply will just abruptly drop. If we have made these changes to discourage US production as well, we will be in even worse shape.

I have a hard time seeing that whatever we do (or don't do) with respect to oil will make much of a difference with respect to climate change. Oil production is headed down quickly regardless. If we pull the same amount out, now or later doesn't matter in the whole scheme of things. If we pull less, that may make a bit of a difference, but relative to total world production, not much.

I don't see weaning off of our addiction as an issue. Financial crises are likely to make our ability to continue buying the huge amount of foreign oil that we have purchased in the past a non-starter.

If we wait until the problem becomes unbearable, then we will have missed the window to make major changes in our lifestyles and infrastructure, which will be to our dire disadvantage. Trying to continue in a BAU-style manner is only putting off the inevitable, and suffering greater consequences when the time comes to pay the piper.

I think preserving future resources is a total non-starter.

Gail, this statement deserves it's own article. What you imply goes entirely against the fundamental tenant of the conservation movement. Unfortunately, you are almost certainly correct.

Alaska is a perfect example. Prudhoe Bay was the largest oilfield in North America and justified the enormous expense of development for the whole North Slope, including Alpine, North Star etc, which were nearly giant on their own merit. Even with all the infrastructure in place, the rumor has started that 300K/day of flow will not support continued operations at any price (In other words, they pop the PB gas cap, dramatically dropping oil production and hastening shutdown. With no gas pipe I'm sure they could produce longer). The fields will be dismantled, not mothballed. I've long felt that Alaska should have kept excess royalties in the ground rather than in the financial markets, but an understanding of infrastructure demands means this doesn't work without full ownership of the field.

I could say that Alaska should have prohibited all export of raw energy and materials to assure a long and prosperous resource future. But Japan tried this 200 years ago and found political reality prevents rational behavior.

This understanding also belies the presumption that OPEC can withdraw significant production post-peak and prosper. If they do so, they may render some of their reserves stranded AND find new faces on the throne.

While we all desire a low peak and gradual descent, Peak Oil is past. We can no longer impact the height from which we will fall, so since we've entered the decline phase, the proper course of action is to continue BAU as long as possible. We should minimize the rate of descent all the way down. Successful social attempts to reduce demand will increase the rate of descent, today and tomorrow. Efficiency gains will increase the impact of declines. All subsidy of non-economic development should be eliminated (while fully funding R&D). No matter what we do, we're nearly equally screwed, so we might as well enjoy every moment we can, and also, if we really pull out the stops, maybe, just maybe, we'll avoid a back-breaking economic fall and instead just get bruised rolling down the steep decline.

I live in mountain country, and I know three men who survived falls of several hundred feet down steep brush covered slopes. One had his pants ripped off and lost his wallet (a good analogy of what is going to happen to us economically), but he could walk the next day.

This doom and gloom perspective extends to producers as well. I just don't see Venezuela or the UAE prospering for long after the big three (N.A., EU, Asia) implode. They should be pumping like crazy and be terrified like the rest of us.

I keep wondering which of the three will drop out first, and whether it will benefit the survivors.

Gail, you rock. Wrap this up and put a bow on it, and let's see who can poke holes in it.

Oh, and others might not notice that while social voluntary conservation makes no sense, personal voluntary conservation makes all the sense in the world. I am striving to reduce not only my personal demand, but especially my dependence on oil. It ain’t easy, nor really possible, but my community can contemplate an 1870’s level of existence, which is about as far as we can go while the mainstream economy keeps chugging. It’s like we’re sitting in a sailboat on the back of the Titanic. It’ll be nip and tuck avoiding the whirlpool and swarms of humanity. But the guys I’m with know how to sail and I’ve brought a tucker box, a chart a compass and we are ballasted with chicken manure. If you are wondering why chicken manure on a sailboat, then you haven't read "Road Fever" by Tim Cahill. Look for inspiration everywhere.

Go Gail, go. By the way, what are you doing personally to prepare?

Cold Camel

I am glad someone doesn't think I am totally crazy.

I wrote a post back in June 2008 that I titled something like "If we are going to drill, we should do it now". I got a huge amount of negative comments. One of the other editors changed the title to "The US Offshore Drilling Argument: The Debate Between 'Starting Now' and 'Waiting a While'".

Regarding what I am doing personally to prepare, I have done a little, but not a lot. I bought a solar oven, and a bought a bunch of children's swimming pools I can catch rain water in. I have tried to do a little gardening, but figured out that where I live, the land is much better adapted to growing forests than to growing vegetables. I have a little extra food and water in the house, and have a little gold and silver for trading.

I have thought about buying land, and farming somewhere, but upon investigation, didn't find this a very good option. For one thing, I am not physically strong enough, and don't have the knowledge to do what would be required to support myself, much less other family members. I have visited farms in the area, but either the farmers are growing very little of what they need for a subsistence existence, or they are using techniques that are clearly unsustainable (irrigation using municipal water, tractors, organic sprays on fruit, electric fences for deer, etc.). Often, they are located many miles from the nearest town.

It seems to me that either nearly everyone makes it, or very few make it. If others don't have food, I don't see how I can put my solar oven outside my house to cook what I have, and not have others take it. If I have a lot of something (food, ammunition, medical supplies, etc) stored up, it seems likely that word will get around, and someone will try to break in and steal it.

Because of these considerations, it seems to me that one needs to make the best of the time available now, before the crash. I am not sure that there is much one can do to cushion the fall later. Perhaps moving to a different area would be better, but without the infrastructure (and knowledge base) that is built up over a period of years to sustain subsistence agriculture, I don't see how it would work, regardless. Without draft animals, the work would be terribly difficult. Somehow, one would need to change all of society, and I don't see a way of doing it.

Gail,I sincerely hope that if tshtf for real that somebody out there who is capable of surviving will take you in,as you have earned your spot by putting so much into helping your readers see and understand what the future may look like.

Now I am getting sort of old myself and also helping take care of my parents,who with luck might live another ten or fifteen years,and I hope that I can with a little help keep this old farm running that long no matter what.I am not absolutely sure that it can be done, but we are gradually doing what must be done to return to the ways of my grandparents,who grew up farming with mules and used hardly any fossil fuels except a little kerosene for light and some coal indirectly in the iron tools commonly used before automobiles arrived in the twenties, followed by electricity in the thirties.

The thing that worries me the most is that if things do get really nasty,we will probably sooner or later fall victim to a maruading gang of some sort,although the pickings will be relatively slim and the price high in these mountians,where even little old lady Sunday school teachers "know how to shoot Pappa's gun".We will if necessary fall back still farther to the old ways to the extent we can and partially revive the klans traditions of the Scots and Irish and help look after each other by whatever means are available.My paternal grand father habitually ate with a knife, a habit he had from his Daddy and Grand Daddy before him.People have lived with weapons constantly ready to hand in many times and many places,and we may yet do so ourselves.

As you have pointed out above,the likelihood of a typical modern day urban citizen being able to survive by subsistence farming is small to nonexistent.I am really glad to see you,as one of the leading lights of this forum, acknowledge this harsh truth without mincing words.I am afraid that some readers here who lack the requisite knowledge to seperate the bullxxxx from the rest of the discussion of organic fertilizers ,so to speak,will be taken in by some of the many grossly overoptimistic writers and visionaries in regard to food self sufficiency.

If so,they may make plans,either long term or short,which could concievably cost them thier lives and the lives of thier children.

I am not personally convinved that the lights are going out,although I do readily acknowledge that it can happen, and am planning accordingly.My personal guess is that unless there is a full scale war,we will survive the next few decades (without very many if any people starving or freezing in the US)by going onto a wartime sort of footing.People will be moving to warmer parts of the country and doubling up to save on rent and utilities.Millions of people will be on the eqiuvalent of food stamps,and most of the nonessential consumer society taken for granted today will be only a fond memory.Work of some sort that will be useful in transitioning to a low energy society will be available in most places,paid for of course with government funds.Rationing of some products such as gasoline will be draconian.Life could get pretty ugly, especially in the larger cities,when the young men find themselves either unemployed or at best able to get only a subsistence wage dead end job.

Once the reality of peak oil jackhammers itself into the heads of the people,the politicians will as usual see which way the wind is blowing and get out in front to lead us where we are going any way.Hopefully there will still be enough industrial capacity to build wind and solar infrastructure the way we used to build highways and shopping malls.I do not see why this should be such a big problem,since manpower will be plentiful to say the least,and many existing industrial facilities can be converted to new products.A machine used today to make gears for trucks can very easily be modified to make gears for windmills,and the factory that produces the fiberglass for the hoods and fenders can almost certainly adjust to making fiberglass for turbine blades.Life should return to something approaching "normal"within the lives of todays toddlers if I am right.The generations that follow will have to make such further adjustments as they find necessary.It should be easier for them,since the first step of any journey is the hardest.They will at least have the advantage of knowing that they MUST adapt.As I said before,this is just my personal estimate of what the future holds for us here in the US.I expect the Four Horsemen will be afield in Asia and a good many other places.

I am always try to say so when I am just guessing or breezing.When I talk agriculture you may rest assured that I have walked that walk in a way that only a few people still around can relate to from personal experience.I plowed some with my grandfathers mules when I was a kid, and my Daddy still plowed our garden with the last mule in the family up into the nineties-although we have had tractors since the forties.(Had to keep the mule in training,you see ,as well as preserve the old ways for old times sake.)I also happen to hold a degree in ag from a well regarded university.

Listen folks.

Gail is right.Farming at the subsistence level is brutally hard work,the learning curve is steep,suitable land is not to be found just anywhere,and the hours are long.If you think the big crash is on its way,and you think you will need to be food self sufficient ,you need to get started right now by taking a serious look at the land and climate of your home turf.The odds are high that you will need to move.Start getting your hands dirty now.You have a realistic shot at making it- starting from scratch if you are healthy and not too old-if you are willing to do what it takes,and the crash doesn't arrive for a few years.

I'm not a doomer. I want to say that upfront. There is another peak-oil board that is quite well topped up on doomers though, which I stopped visiting last year due to a certain amount of hate-based political ideas I found quite distasteful. Before I left it for good however, I would read comments from people who decided they were "set" because they lived on five acres out of town. It got me thinking of all the McMansions sprouting up on five acre plots in farmland nearby. It seemed that there was little thought about what goes into subsistence or farming without gas powered tools, and I thought I'd try my hand at it as an experiment. I failed miserably and had to cheat at every step.

My plot was 90x30 ft. I was able to do about 30x30 feet without powertools (although I did have a guy with a tractor till up the whole area first -- so I started out cheating). I got through about 30x30 feet of the garden before it became clear that because of an old elbow injury, I wasn't going to be able to do it with a shovel and hoe. I broke down and bought a tiller. Of course, it bears mentioning that even metal hand tools represent a cheat, not to mention electrically pumped water.

It was still a major undertaking. I did enjoy a large amount of fresh vegetables. I weighed my produce and kept track of my expenditures and even with buying a rototiller, I broke even on produce -- made a profit if I depreciated the tiller over several years. That is, until it came to storage. I lost much of my profits to mold over the winter. It turns out that preservation of even hardy winter squash is extremely difficult. Also, choosing the right things to grow and in what proportions is an issue as well. Eating a pound/day of snow peas may be healthy, but after a week or so it becomes unbearable, even if they are worth $6/pound. A lot of my garden profit was "lost" by giving away food, though this type of loss didn't bother me. For purposes of the experiment however, it represents a failure.

As the food started piling up in summer and fall, I cheated again and bought a largish food dehydrator. While effective at what I did dry, I would need to expand it to twenty trays and buy several more equally large setups to put up a significant amount of food. Plus, it uses electricity and for some things, would have to run 24 hours or more (I live in a humid area).

I made some pickles. Cheating again to buy jars and lids, vinegar, sugar, salt, and spices. I have no idea how to make my own vinegar. Even in our fat day and age, the stores ran out of jars. In a doomer scenario, I wouldn't have been able to get any at all. Cheating again, I cooked the food on my electric stove. I'm currently planning on getting a pressure cooker so I can do low acid foods -- another cheat.

This year I wanted to be a bit more self-sufficient (aside from using power tools). However, I started my tomatoes too early and it looks like I'll have to buy starts again. Of course I bought all the seeds I'm using, though I do I have some parsnips and kale in the garden that I'm letting go to seed to try my hand at seed saving.

My experiment has made me conclude that many people have no idea how complicated gardening is and that in any doomer scenario, I'm a goner. We tend to think of farmers as uneducated hicks, that all you have to do is throw out some seeds and you'll eat hearty all year. It is actually a powerful test of one's intellectual and physical prowess. Then of course, there is a large amount luck involved for the inexperienced and still a bit of luck for those with decades to draw upon. For example, last year was very cool here -- most of my tomatoes never ripened, and although the green tomato apple relish is excellent, I would have liked to have had more red tomatoes.

Anyway, I totally failed at every level at no-oil gardening. I did however lose about 2" of belly and the food was delightful. This year, I'm doing it for the flavor, not the experiment.

That is an excellent synapse of what we face. I thought I was pretty smart to be DOING something but it turns out the really smart folks can see that nothing will work. I'll still keep preparing if you don't mind. I am pessimistic for the world, but cautiously optimistic for my own children.

The question remains, why aren't you a doomer? Oh, right. Enlightened people are in the now. We're all going to die, no sense worrying about it. I'm not being sarcastic. I still worry.

Cold Camel

I'm not a doomer because peak oil is not the end of oil, it is the end of cheap oil. I think our standard of living will decline because we won't have access to as much energy to do magic things for us, but I don't think it will decline to the point where everyone hunts and farms with sticks and carved antler bits. Government will have to shed some bloat (I hope) due to a lower tax base. I think the third world will be hell because the first world will look out for itself first and foremost -- nothing actually new there. Lastly, while I don't think we'll see much short-term benefit from alternative energies, it doesn't seem overly optimistic to think that forty or fifty years hence, world technology will look quite different than now, and some real options may exist.

Gail,
You are a visionary. Be careful about your immediate surroundings. Visionaries tend to get eaten.

I missed your 6/08 post and the paragraph:

The idea of saving oil for our grandchildren is popular among people who are peak oil aware. The problem is that we are saving fields that are difficult to extract, in remote locations. If they are difficult for us to extract now, they are likely to be even more difficult for future generations to extract, when fewer resources are available.

Only a visionary could make that statement prior to the price and production collapse. I certainly didn’t share that view back then. But I do now.

Considering that you grok the financial impact of resource constraints, your preparations seem a bit on the light side.

First, you need a refuge in place where you can procure food. As they say in real estate, location, location, location. You should fit in culturally and you don't want much diversity. No sense in moving to a war zone. You want a culturally intact community where people care about their neighbors. Surprisingly, considering all the fear-mongering news, this isn’t too difficult. You want to be somewhere moderately poor so they won't find it unbearable to drop back. Some rural poor people retain the tools that you lack. Mini-mansion country is a death-trap. Basically this says to me that you should live in a mostly rural state in a small town 2 hours from a big city.

You bring something special to the table. With your foresight and worldly outlook, helping others should be easy. The trick is to pick something that the locals totally take for granted and provide a post-peak alternative.

A cottage on a few acres will do. It’s the neighbors that matter. You want neighbors that know each other, and who will stop in and chat. They will all know you even though you don’t know them. Set up your barter system early. Every time you visit, you should take a homemade loaf/bottle/jar etc to your neighbor. No return gift required or expected.

For you, assuming you are a woman by herself who doesn’t have a killer mind-set, most would suggest you forget gold. I differ. Keep it till you need it, then give it away. Junior, who is in diapers now, will remember, and give you the warm chair by the fire.

Or, ask to park a container on their land. Fill it with stuff, and leave them the key. Do the same thing with three neighbors. You’ll be the wise woman that kept them out of the gutter. What’s it full of? Whatever you think they will need. Stuff is dirt cheap now, and available in unlimited quantities. They’ll take care of you.

Labor is going to be cheap. You physical prowess is going to be less valuable than the seeds in your container. Physical strength comes attached to the brawny back of your neighbor’s grown sons. If the wife and you are best friends, you’ll do fine.

Again, you’re not trying to be self-sufficient, just a benefit to the community. Play to your strengths. Let someone else keep your solar oven.

It seems to me that either nearly everyone makes it, or very few make it.

This is a copout. If everyone makes it, there is no point in personal preparation. Seize the nettle.

FYI, I’ve been actively working on my preparations for six years and have a long ways to go. But with the right mental mindset, you would be surprised how quickly you could move into a new area and become part of the social fabric, even if you aren’t a social butterfly. People are nice now. That will change.

The alternative is to party ‘til the end, as most of the masses are doing. Alaska tourism is still booming, but the word on the street is that the visitors are hoping this isn’t the last time. Clearly, and you know this in your heart, that cannot be the solution. Get active or party, there is no middle ground.

But it bugs me that others on TOD seem to be encouraging others to remain passive. To me this is a clear indication that they live in a totally unsustainable situation. We are not all doomed. Generally it means they are trapped by age, illness, or as spouse. I’d be just as stuck if I was in their situation. But I’m not, so I act. You can too.

Because of these considerations, it seems to me that one needs to make the best of the time available now, before the crash. I am not sure that there is much one can do to cushion the fall later.

I couldn’t have said it better. You write beautifully.

without the infrastructure (and knowledge base) that is built up over a period of years to sustain subsistence agriculture, I don't see how it would work, regardless. Without draft animals, the work would be terribly difficult.

Uh huh. So? It’s hard for a first-time mother to contemplate giving birth to a baby too. That doesn’t stop them, why should it stop you? This one I've got licked. You can too.

Somehow, one would need to change all of society

Nope. All you need to do is live comfortably for the rest of your life and give to your neighbors till that day.

Please reply. If this ramble isn't useful, I've wasted a whole bunch of time.
Cold Camel