81 comments on Natural Gas Revisited
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
81 comments on Natural Gas Revisited
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Any coward can fight a battle when he's sure of winning, but give me the man who has pluck to fight when he's sure of losing. That's my way, sir; and there are many victories worse than a defeat.”
—George Eliot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The majors are the ones involved in offshore work. Offshore production was very much impacted by the two hurricanes, and the same time that onshore production surged. Breaking out the production the way he does, he is basically breaking out mostly offshore from 100% onshore. The remaining part is also onshore. It can be expected to act like the rest of the onshore--that is, have a big increase.
I think Simmons is worried about nothing. To me, the data looks right.
I haven't seen the article (I'm supposed to get a copy later today--maybe someone else has a copy?), but reportedly Natural Gas Daily has an article about the EIA looking at revising their NG production methodology--because of the discrepancy between what their numbers show and what public companies are reporting.
did you get a copy ? the api will allow a free trial subscription hook.
Excerpt down below. The article noted that Raymond James showed an increase of less than 1% in natural gas production from public companies from Q4 2007 to Q1 2008, while the EIA showed a 3% increase in total production, although Raymond James is showing more of increase in Q1 2009 than the EIA.
I was in a meeting with Matt and a group of people in his office a few weeks ago, and Matt was quite adamant that he though that there were problems with the EIA natural gas numbers. He is concerned that the decline in drilling will put the industry in a position where we may not be able to catch up with demand--perhaps as soon as late 2010. He also thinks the Qatar reserves are significantly overstated.
Here is an excerpt:
From the June 4, 2009 Gas Daily:
EIA reviewing accuracy of production estimates