Fast breeding as in Catholics?

Sometimes yes Catholics (mainly in the past), but even more another theo-ideology that I hardly need to name.

Pentecostals?

On May 5, 2009, some began taking population control into their own hands:

"New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg...discussed in the top-secret meeting included....slowing the global population growth."(See Wall Street Jounal Story)

I hear Oprah is back on the eatin' wagon...I can just hear her now, "mmmmmm....Soylent Green."

1. The pollution of the environment may eventually affect the birth rate. Estrogen mimic chemicals have an impact on the sexing of trout to aligators. So the problem may be self correcting.

2. In terms of biological evolution when single cells got together and produced multicelluar organisms, there developed a way to control the type and number of cells in a this more complicated organism. Uncontrolled growth is generally seen as cancer. In that sense the human race may be acting as a cancer in gaia. Since we as a species are aware of this, there seems to be the possibility that a self regulation of the numbers of our species on earth may be possible. It would seem that an arrangement for people to control the number of offspring should enable them to become members of a society where everyone is cared for. This goes to the control of the borders preventing uncontrolled immigration. The operation of the social insects could give some insight on how this might be organized, as per "Brave New World" by A. Huxley. Freedom to breed seems to be something not possible in the new world order.

What is not mentioned a lot here:

http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse

...and in the above piece are FEEDBACK MECHANISMS?

These are not the kind that are forced or written into law...they occur as rational consequences related to human endeavours and expectations.

In other words...humans do their stuff...and the "real world" reacts and forces humans onto a non-planned path.

My personal opinion is that while some humans might see what's here and on the way....and try to change to avoid a precarious future...I doubt that they will manage to actually do things all that much differently...thus God or Gaia...or just plain reality is gonna bite.

As far as overpopulation...when we still have several major religions promoting overpopulation...apparently in a contest to see who will "win"...we should be prepared to meet the FEEDBACK MECHANISMS or the 3 horsemen?

Not to mention nations competing for remaining resources...and polluting like there is no tomorrow to build economies to sell more stuff to more and more people.

I can only laugh.

LDS?

I was thinking rather of a certain theo-ideology whose members conspicuously "need" to migrate in large numbers to others' countries due to running out of space in all their own lands. Not clear what the LDS is, any enlightenment?

Robin,
I expect LDS is the tla for the Later Day Saints ,better known as The Mormons.There are quite a few of them in Utah,and a few scattered around here and there else where.

Old Farmer,

From http://www.quiverfull.com/

Dedicated to providing encouragement and practical help to those who are striving to raise a large and growing, godly family in today's world!

They quote:

Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD:
and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man;
so are children of the youth.
Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them:
they shall not be ashamed,
but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.
Psalm 127:3-5 (KJV)

And use as an example:

Michelle & Jim Bob Duggar.....one-issue politician--a conservative Republican who cares only about stopping abortions. His 13 children, born during Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar's 17 years of marriage, are family values personified. .

These delusional folks advocate family size of around 12 - "a quiver full".

Why does a rational society provide tax deductions for these criminals?

That post [...delusional folks.....these criminals...] if written about Mohammed-followers in the uk would be considered by them to rate prosecution as religious hatred (even though the Qur'an would qualify infinitely more, notwithstanding Obama's latest lies), though in practice that law was only introduced to pacify the Muslim lobby and the Attorney General has not yet been coaxed into actually starting any prosecutions.

Hi RobinPC,

You're right that "criminal" was a poor choice of words - I should be more thoughtful. Selfish and inconsiderate is more the idea. But it is selfishness to the point of not caring how having a dozen children in a affluent country like the US stresses the lives of other people around the globe. Our consumption and polution footprints have a direct bearing on the well being of people in much poorer nations. In some context, the idea of "justice" ought to be considered for this type of reproduction. I am sure that there are nations in the world that take a dim view of Americans having 13 well fed children while they struggle with subsistence living conditions.

Thinking about other countries - I wonder how the authorities would treat a couple in China who deliberately create 13 children? How would they view this in terms of justice and prosecution? I really don't know the answer to this question, but I'd guess they would take a very dim view. While in the US we generally encourage larger families and provide tax deductions.

I was merely indicating the uk law of "religious hatred", not saying I agreed with it!

Dave,

Why,indeed,do we still give tax deductions for large families?I don't expect there is any need to go into that,it's just one more example of all the other irrational things we do as a society.

As far as the Mormons themselves are concerned,a population biologist would probably say that the strategy of having very large families is and has been a successful strategy for the Mormons as a social group/clan/tribe(whatever terms are currently in vogue).

Of course such high birthrates lead to population overload quickly if sustained,but if the Mormons raise enough kids successfully,thier genes inherit the earth-or at least whatever is left of it,if anything,for a while.

When humans were scarce,we had to cooperate to compete with the other animals that ate the same foods in the same environment,and to protect ourselves from the animals that would otherwise eat us.

Nowadays we compete as "us" groups against "them" groups of other humans.Packs of wolves,prides of lions,and bands of chimps compete in the same way.

If there were such a thing as an evolutionary scorecard,the winning group would be the most numerous group.

But the top of the evolutionary hill is a very slippery place and no group of individuals or speices manages to stay there very long in evolutionary time.The Mormons may be clawing thier way toward the top,but I expect our speices as a whole is headed for a serious(to us) crash.

Mother Nature is an entirely heartless bitch and she could (not) care less.Out here on the farm when we are not spraying some nasty chemical to get rid of some particular bug,and killing a dozen useful bugs at the same time,we are used to seeing the age old game played out between the foxes and the rabbits.When the rabbits have a good year,the foxes have a very good year,the following year the rabbits have a very poor year as the result of the foxes good year,the following year the foxes have an extremely bad year as a result of what they did to the rabbits the previous year.
I paint with a broad brush of course,nothing in nature is quite so simple.

My personal opinion of the Mormons is that the ninety percent or so of them living under the heel of the other ten percent need to wake up and get the hell out of Utah,but you do have to admit that the old bulls in charge have done a good job of running things,from thier pov.Not many old men in this world can have a nubile young wife simply for the asking of an old buddy-knowing that of course he will be coming around for the same favor later.

As far as abortion is concerned,I am strenously opposed to it as a default method of birth control,but otherwise if a woman finds herself preggo and after serious soul searching on her part wants an abortion,I cannot see that it really is anyone else's business-although the potential father might righteously feel differently.

The soul searching is important,because some women later bitterly regret thier decision to abort.

The Republican party has shot itself in the foot by buying the antiabortion vote in violation of true conservative principles of personal liberty, self determination, and limited government.This tactical decision helped win some elections in the past,but is is nowadays an electoral loser on the national level,and I expect the next generation of republican leadership will quietly drop the issue.

Otoh,I don't see how anybody can look at a six month fetus and not see a human being.Personally I maintain the necessary cognitive dissonance that allows me to support limited abortions by not looking and not thinking,otherwise I feel the bile rising and the whole idea makes me ill.

I do not find it at all hard to understand why some people hold such strong beliefs in this respect that they are willing to resort to murder to stop what is after all to them,not only murder but murder of the powerless and helpless.

Life is a real bitch in some respects,is it not?

could (not) care less.
H'a'h. You Yanks may yet properly learn the language of England.

Later Day Saints (Mormons). They do have large families and migrate to Utah.