Great post Cameron, and very timely with Prof Kjell Aleklett in Australia for the next 10 days. He will be meeting numerous Government and industry people next week and I will draw his attention to the neat way you have recalibrated the NESA fuel security framework. I am sure Kjell will be able to make use of your appraisal in his discussions and presentations, helping him raise concerns about the realism of the LFVA and NESA. I will also send the Energy White Paper secretariat a link to your post to make sure they review it as an input to the Green Paper they are now preparing.
Essentially what you have done here is present a well-argued alternative scenario which differs in important ways from the single perspective of the future described in the NESA. I have argued since April that it is vital for the Energy White Paper to explore the policy implications of a range of significantly different energy scenarios out to 2030, and here you have provided one.
I really like your calm and professional writing style which should connect well with senior-level audiences like those Kjell will be meeting. We can't be sure of the immediate impact on Business As Usual but it certainly helps to have well-organised thinking like this post to challenge professional audiences.
Thanks for your comments Mark. I went to an EWP workshop earlier in the year and actually sent a copy of this post to a member of the White Paper team prior to having this published. They acknowledged receipt but have not responded to my criticisms.
I also had the opportunity to ask a question of a RET representative at another event about what happens if peak oil occurs significantly earlier than suggested in the WEO2008. The answer was fuel efficiency, biofuels, GTL and CTL - all those things the current NESA say will only be marginal out to 2023 - in short the Govt has no plan B.
Great post Cameron, and very timely with Prof Kjell Aleklett in Australia for the next 10 days. He will be meeting numerous Government and industry people next week and I will draw his attention to the neat way you have recalibrated the NESA fuel security framework. I am sure Kjell will be able to make use of your appraisal in his discussions and presentations, helping him raise concerns about the realism of the LFVA and NESA. I will also send the Energy White Paper secretariat a link to your post to make sure they review it as an input to the Green Paper they are now preparing.
Essentially what you have done here is present a well-argued alternative scenario which differs in important ways from the single perspective of the future described in the NESA. I have argued since April that it is vital for the Energy White Paper to explore the policy implications of a range of significantly different energy scenarios out to 2030, and here you have provided one.
I really like your calm and professional writing style which should connect well with senior-level audiences like those Kjell will be meeting. We can't be sure of the immediate impact on Business As Usual but it certainly helps to have well-organised thinking like this post to challenge professional audiences.
Cheers, Mark
Congratulations Cameron on an excellent post.
It's a pity that no press photos exist of Kevin Rudd waving this paper and saying
"National Energy Security in Our Time!"
;-)
Thanks for your comments Mark. I went to an EWP workshop earlier in the year and actually sent a copy of this post to a member of the White Paper team prior to having this published. They acknowledged receipt but have not responded to my criticisms.
I also had the opportunity to ask a question of a RET representative at another event about what happens if peak oil occurs significantly earlier than suggested in the WEO2008. The answer was fuel efficiency, biofuels, GTL and CTL - all those things the current NESA say will only be marginal out to 2023 - in short the Govt has no plan B.