Tahoe;
That's a great read, but I have to call out OFF TOPIC on you, not to silence the ideas, only to say that this is a conversation that deserves to be in a post where it will get due attention.

Of course, the undermining of our great rail Infrastructure was a shame, but it was also a response against the Rail Monopolies and Tycoons, which the Highways replaced, ironically enough, with a form of 'Commons'. In rebuilding Rail, can we point it in a positive direction, such that the keepers of the access to these thoughways are inherently checked against gouging and the kind of heavy handedness that partly defined Rail in its heyday?

(Alan and others try to describe some solutions to this for me, but I need Special-Ed Remedial Level help on this stuff!)

Thx,
Bob

jokuhl,

You said, it part, "... Rail Monopolies and Tycoons, which the Highways replaced, ironically enough, with a form of 'Commons'."

That is a VERY astute observation and one that is not often enough mentioned. The highway and automobile system (including trucking) in so many ways "democratized" transportation. That is why abandoning the ownership of and operation of private cars (and trucks, by millions of small businesses) is considered such a threat to Americans. Rail is good, very good, for many things, but it is not problem free.

RC

Part of solution is "govt. ownership" per EU. Too bad US can't learn to trust govt., (or develop a govt. worthy of?)