149 comments on The 2012 Oil Crunch vs. Cash for Clunkers
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
149 comments on The 2012 Oil Crunch vs. Cash for Clunkers
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…”
—Winston Churchill, November 1936
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I am kind of wondering if this entire program has enough conditions on it to make it more of a PR stunt than anything else. To take advantage of it, you need something defined as a "clunker". Who would own such vehicles? Mostly people who can't afford to replace them. And offering people 4500$ isn't going to be enough for them to be able to afford a new vehicle - if they were to replace the clunker, they would likely replace it with a somewhat newer clunker.
The one exception is that some people might keep an old pickup for those occasions where you need to haul some stuff. But for these cases, I don't see that there is a huge incentive to trade the thing in. You have an old vehicle that is paid for, and you want to have to start making payments so you have a shiny pickup to start hauling crap once a month? That doesn't add up either..
Exception #2: Someone who's kid is driving an old clunker, and they take this opportunity to trade in the clunker, buy a new car, and hand down the parents current car to the kid.
In other words, it's aimed at me. In the long run though, it's not likely to be cost effective for me to trade in a 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis to buy even an efficient car like a Honda Civic, and pass down my 2001 Chevy Prizm (Corolla clone) to my son. While he's still in college, my son only puts 3000-4000 miles a year on his car, so the cost of fuel isn't that big a factor. The cost of repairs on the clunker is a factor, but it would never be a big enough factor to be worth spending $14,000 on a new car to eliminate.
Don't forget the annual registration fee on the vehicle. In my state, Arizona, it is based on the list price of the automobile and the number of years since the vehicle was first registered. In short, the annual registration for an old clunker is about $15 / year and for a new car, it is several hundred dollars per year.