![]() | Alcatraz: the TOD-ASPO gathering | The Oil Drum: Europe | High altitude wind power: an era of abundance? | ![]() |
111 comments on Encircling the peak of world oil production - an evaluation
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
111 comments on Encircling the peak of world oil production - an evaluation
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
- www.SamassaVeneessä.info Finnish peak oil site
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Nate -- A few (management mostly) in the industry have always understood the declining status of the big picture of US declining reserves. I can promise that the vast majority at the technical level have had little interest in the exact numbers. I can include myself in that group for the most part. Not that we don't understand the production base but we just didn't and still don't care. You can imagine that if you were tasked with finding new oil/NG reserves for the last 25 years or so it would pretty difficult to escape the obvious. Easily 90% of us are focused on the small game...the day to day effort. Not that we don't understand the big picture but it has no bearing to us on the immediate goal: add reserves in a cost effective manner.
One somewhat annoying set of comments on TOD regards what "the industry knows", what the "industry does", what the "industry conspires", what the "industry is planning", etc, etc. The "industry" doesn't engage in any of these activities. The industry doesn't do anything. I understand it's convenient to use such collective terminology in our conversation but it tends to grossly misrepresent what I witness daily. It's no different then when someone characterizes TOD as a group that thinks this way or believes one way or the other. At worse such usage offers a basis for positions which are far from realistic. The simplest example is the focus on the press releases of the management of public oil companies. Many here understand the true purpose of those statements: say whatever is legal in order to pump up enthusiasm for the company's stock. It is not to educate folks on the real nature of PO. Unfortunately, many folks believe these words represent what the "industry thinks or believes". Such beliefs only cloud the discussions. I do appreciate the skeptical attitude many view the statement from industry insiders. Some are, at best, misleading while others are outright dishonest. But lumping us all together as the "industry" will cause the loss of valuable insight. Not a really serious rant but something to bear in mind as we forward and are increasing bombarded by what the “industry” has to say.
Understood.
In the end it is about how wide a lens one uses - people in 'the industry' use a very narrow lens - they are paid to.