47 comments on Here It Comes: 'Fossil fuel' theory takes hit with NASA finding
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
47 comments on Here It Comes: 'Fossil fuel' theory takes hit with NASA finding
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Home Buyers Demand Short Commutes, Efficient Homes (with Backyards, Parking, lots of Square Feet)
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
TOD:Europe
- IEA WEO 2008 - Fossil Fuel Ultimates and CO2 Emissions Scenarios
- The IEA WEO 2008: Will coal usage be phased out?
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
—Big Oil Executive
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
Assuming the total remaining recoverable oil in the world is 600 billion barrels, if you lay that oil evenly on the surface of the earth, it's a thin layer of slightly less than 0.5 milimeter thick. That tells you how precious petroleum is. If it were abiotic, vastly much more quantity of oil would have been found already.
If you divide that quantity by the total volume of the earth, it's only 8.8x10^-5 ppm of the earth's volume. That's how precious oil is and we should be grateful that the petroleum, which is of biological origin, is concentrated in a way for us to retrieve easily.
It's true abiotic methane is found in plenty else where in the solar system. Since earth is formed from the same primordal soup, one may reasonably suspect that the same abiotic methane may exist on earth. The very origin of life on earth requires a high concentration of organic material in the promordal soup that formed the earth.
But it's all irrevevant as pie in the sky, or as irrelevant as methane on the Titan, as long as we have not found where these methane are on the earth, or have no reasonable way of retrieving and utilizing these methanes. We already know there is plenty of methane hydrates, equivalent to several times the known petroleum reserves, right underneath the bottom of oceans. But we currently have no technology to fetch those methanes hydrates.
1 bbl oil = 5.6145833 cuft (per www.onlineconversion.com)
5.6145833*10^6 cuft / 5280 ft / 5280 ft / 5280 ft = 0.00003814 mi^3.