New UK Energy Minister

Following the unexpected resignation of Lord Sainsbury, the supermarket billionaire, on Friday (10Nov06) from his post as the Minister for Science our Energy Minister Malcolm Wicks has left his post at the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to take up the vacant position of Science Minister.

A new Energy Minister then? Well, kind of. Wicks' ministerial position sat within the DTI, reporting to the Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling. It is Darling who is to take on personal responsibility for the energy brief going forward. This does promote the energy brief to a cabinet level position - long called for by those in the energy industry - but also dilutes attention as Darling maintains his existing responsibilities. The sceptical could perhaps point out the UK no longer has an energy minister though I don't think that's fair.


Goodbye Malcolm Wicks

Hello Alistair Darling
Around these parts Wicks will be most remembered for his ludicrous comment to parliament on 23rd Nov 2005, as all the evidence suggested (later to be proved correct) the country faced an extremely challenging and tight gas supply over the coming winter Wicks suggested the country was "awash with gas".

The Guardian newspaper made this curious comment on the news:

Mr Wicks was considered to have done well with the energy brief and is generally seen as a safe pair of hands.
Done well? If the output from last year's Energy Review or the comments from the DTI's Clare Durkin last week are anything to go by I would not say Wicks as done well. There is little evidence that he is recognising let alone addressing either the national challenges the UK faces as North Sea oil and gas play out, nuclear and coal power stations are decommissioned and renewable energy sources continue to struggle to gain traction over the coming decade or the global energy challenge that peak oil represents. In fact we heard from Durkin that the DTI hasn't even investigated the issue.

Can we expect better from Alistair Darling? Maybe. It would seems that the energy brief has moved up the agenda residing with a cabinet level minister though no doubt many would claim it deserves it's own dedicated representation. Interestingly the Department of Trade and Industry was almost renamed the Department for Productivity, Energy and Industry last Summer, a move seen by many as recognising the increasing importance of energy. We may not have the name change but the internal reorganisation is to be welcomed.

Who is Alistair Darling?

A Labour member of parliament for 19 years and due to celebrate his 53rd birthday in a couple of weeks, Darling represents the constituency of Edinburgh South West. Previous to his political career he was awarded a law degree from the University of Aberdeen and became a solicitor then advocate. He was only appointed Secretary of State for Trade and Industry in May 2006. Previously he was at the Department for Transport, it is his performance in this position that gives me concern. During his time at DfT road congestion has increased markedly and shortly after he left congestions targets were increased such that:

Ministers will judge traffic control to be a success if journey times increase by no more than 4.4% over the next four years - but some parts of England could increase by much more than this. In Bristol, for example, the Government believes journey times will increase by 14%, and by 11% in Yorkshire by 2010.
Link.
In addition to this failing we also have the much criticised Aviation White Paper forecasting the doubling of 2002 passenger numbers by 2020 and a doubling of air freight by 2010.

A safe pair of hands? By the Guardian's use of the phrase, maybe.

http://tinyurl.com/y6e7wk

DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY News Release (P/2006/242) issued by The Government News Network on 9 November 2006
Planning inquiries for large-scale electricity projects will be overhauled by new rules outlined today by Alistair Darling, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry.

Delays, costs and uncertainty have too frequently held back major projects. The common sense changes being brought in will tackle that.  Greater efficiency,greater transparency.  Good for the economy, our energy security and public
engagement.

Set out in the Energy Review the reforms will streamline the planning system. Introduced swiftly to deliver the new infrastructure we need. Critical to our energy security and maintaining public scrutiny.

Go to link for more.

This announcement although fashionably anti-democratic is welcome in the sense that the Gubment is aware that planning delays are a major barrier for implementing any new nuclear plants in the UK being even considered.

Either the decent folks who contribute to this blog and the larger debate of energy security are sadly deluded souls - or the Gubment has secret knowledge.

One area that should be addressed is the world market in LNG - where the US will be a major competitor for supplies ... and UK plans for storage are (as currently known) sadly inadequate.

Can anyone comment on this post http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/11/15/82627/430#123 from Roj? Are there any signs that the UK government has PO in serious consideration?
Are there any signs that the UK government has PO in serious consideration?
Clare Durkin the head of the DTI Energy Markets group the Senior Responsible Officer for the security of energy supplies discussed this last week at the Energy Institute conference. See write up here: Energy Institute Oil Depletion Conference

Early in her presentation she dismissed discussion of peak by saying:

We can debate at great length... when the peak will come, what's going to happen with the peak but the fact is there is still an awful lot out there and it may as well not be out there if we don't have any policies of getting it from out there to where it needs to get.

She seems more concerned about maintaining our access to the production/reserves we know about rather looking at peak oil - there is a small amount of logic in there somewhere.

At the same conference last year she said there would be a government investigation but when asked where it was she had to admit that it hadn't happened, suggesting that there wasn't the resources (people and budget rather than oil!) and that other things were high priority.

Good to see the governments "revolving doors" policy on Ministerial Briefs is being maintained.  Has any minister managed more than 12 months in any given post yet????

I swear this administration is more about the individual senior ministers own careers than it is about serving the country.

Andy