Colin Campbell: Country Assessment UK

In a convenient coincidence with the launch of TOD:UK Colin Campbell, founder of Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO) has this month updated his 2000 country assessment of the United Kingdom. Campbell has carried out these assessments on many counties over recent years with one included in each ASPO newsletter. These can be found by entering the country name in search box on the ASPO Ireland site.
Britain's brief oil age is in decline. The major companies are withdrawing to be replaced by smaller companies, mopping up satellite fields and step-outs, as well as scavenging tail end production from ageing platforms.

Oil production is set to decline at 7-8% a year on the basis of the current depletion rate, falling to less than half its present level by 2010. Britain currently consumes 1.75 Mb/d, making it a net importer on a steeply rising trend. With a population of 60 M, per capita consumption stands at about 11 b/a. Britain exported much of its flush production at a time of depressed oil prices, to which its exports contributed, but now faces buying imports at high prices. It furthermore may find some of its production being exported by the foreign companies who own it, despite growing domestic needs. It would be hard to imagine a less appropriate policy by which to have managed the depletion of a national resource.

The ASPO March 2006 newsletter also includes an interesting paper from Mr Bakhtiari of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), On Middle Eastern Oil Reserves. After considering the likely reserves of key producers he comments:
Oil reserve estimates were useful in the era before 'Peak Oil'. But, in the aftermath of the mighty Peak (as, for example, in the present 'Transition One' period), they tend to become stale and rather useless, as field-by-field analysis and prediction takes over (eg., Ghawar, Cantarell).

So, it will not be long now before we will have to say goodbye to all these mesmerizing oil reserve figures and dump the whole reserves file into the all-encompassing 'dustbin of history'.....

It is inevitable that the closer we get to the peak, field by field and project by project assessments will illustrate the global peak with more accuracy that the traditional Hubbert's curve based on estimated ultimate recoverable reserves (URR).

Campbell's full essay reproduced below the fold.

681. Country Re-Assessment - United Kingdom

The United Kingdom had a strong Neolithic culture, highlighted by the famous astronomical observatory of Stonehenge, long before falling to the Romans in 55 BC. That occupation lasted only a few centuries, but left an indelible mark. It was followed by the dark ages of Viking and Saxon incursions, culminating in the arrival of recycled Danish Vikings from Normandy in 1066, the last military invasion.

General stability brought political and economic progress, including the creation of Parliament, as one of the earlier democratic institutions. The diverse people of the British Isles were absorbed into a single monarchy at various points in history, becoming the United Kingdom and Ireland in 1801. Seafarers stimulated trade and exploration throughout the world, paving the way for the British Empire. At its peak in the reign of Queen Victoria, Britain had become the premier world power, reaping great rewards from the use of the pound sterling for world trade. Great achievements were recorded in the fields of science, literature and culture.

Britain also led the Industrial Revolution during the 18th Century with mills powered by water to make cloth for export to its colonial markets. The wealth, so created, led to the rapid growth of capitalism, banking, usury, investment and a financial economy. Self-sufficient peasants became wage-earners, consumers and tax payers, many working in gruesome industrial slums. Mechanisation based on iron and steel took many directions. Iron smelting made new demands for energy: first from firewood and later from coal. It was at first collected from beaches and outcropping seams before mining commenced. The development of steam driven pumps made it possible to deepen the mines below the water tables. The pumps evolved into steam engines that were later used to power transport, opening the age of the railway that further stimulated trade.

Britain successfully resisted and eventually defeated an epoch of French expansion under Napoleon, but during the 19th Century found itself increasingly threatened by a newly united Germany that was overtaking it in industrial prowess, although lacking the benefit of the pound sterling, the world trading currency that delivered a handsome hidden tribute to the banks in the City of London. These pressures eventually led to two world wars during the 20th Century. One outcome was the break-up of the Middle East into independent countries whose oil rights were shared by the victorious allies. The oil was needed to fuel the internal combustion engine, invented in Germany, which was replacing steam power. Although victorious, Britain was mortally weakened by the wars and voluntarily gave up its once splendid Empire that had brought order and fair administration to much of the world. It half-heartedly joined a newly united European community, preferring to retain its particular financial links with the United States, which eventually replaced the old empires of France and Britain with a new global economic, and now military, hegemony driven by, and for, the dollar.

Massive immigration from the former Empire followed the Second World War, being permitted at first in a sense of colonial responsibility, but later exploited as a source of cheap labour. The indigenous population aged and declined from falling fertility due to affluence, but the overall population expanded to 60 million with the immigrants and their descendants making up more than ten percent.

Most of Ireland had seceded in 1922, with 26 of its counties becoming a Republic in 1947, leaving a form of civil war to fester in the remaining six counties in the north of the island. Scotland and Wales are now recovering earlier autonomies with independent legislatures. Various immigrant cities have developed, some becoming almost small replicas of Karachi or Kingston, Jamaica.

Britain has had a long oil history, both within its own territory, and through the early prominence of its oil companies in the Middle East, Mexico and Venezuela. BP was the flagship with major holdings in Iran, Iraq and Kuwait, while Shell, an Anglo-Dutch enterprise, had a strong position in the Western Hemisphere. BP was once almost a national oil company with a 51% government shareholding and corresponding responsibilities. Formerly the World's largest vendor of crude oil, it now secures its needs more by merger and acquisition, exemplified by the take-overs of Arco and Amoco. Its Chairman and Chief Executive now sit on the board of Goldman Sachs, underlining its new financial priorities. It is the least forthright of the major oil companies on the issue of depletion but does nevertheless now claim that BP stands for Beyond Petroleum, which carries an oblique message.

Non-conventional oil shale had been mined in Scotland in the 19th Century, leading to pioneering refinery processes, and minor oilfields had been found onshore during and before the Second World War. But the breakthrough came during the 1960s, with the development in the southern North Sea of a prolific belt of gas fields, derived from the natural coking of deeply buried coal, first discovered in the Netherlands in 1957. Exploration moved northwards to be rewarded by the discovery of Jurassic rifts, containing prolific source rocks, deposited in one of the prime epochs of generation 150 million years ago, which yielded one giant field after another, extending into Norwegian waters.

Britain had a series of socialist governments to deal with post-War reconstruction, such that the early stages of its oil boom were dominated by State entities, principally the British Gas Council and the British National Oil Company. That ended as a reaction to excessive Trade Union demands, especially from the coal miners, leading to an eruption of new capitalism under Mrs Thatcher, who came to power in 1979 and was able to undermine the miners' control of energy by the new indigenous oil supplies that were coming ashore. The State entities, which could have managed long-term depletion to the national interest, were disbanded, and the major international oil companies, along with many small independents, were given every encouragement to deplete the resources as fast as possible. Production soared as the giant fields were brought on stream with the help of impressive advances in offshore engineering. An early peak was reached in 1987 at 2.6 Mb/d, before production fell partly as a consequence of a major accident at Occidental Petroleum's substandard Piper Field that called for widespread revisions to operating practices and installations. Production growth later resumed, partly also reflecting a second cycle of smaller discoveries, before the country reaches its an overall peak in 1999 at 2.7 Mb/d.

Although the rich deposits of the North Sea dominated production, some other lesser finds were made elsewhere. Lean Lower Jurassic source-rocks gave a solitary large field in Dorset in the otherwise barren English Channel and Western Approaches, and a Carboniferous gas field was found in the Irish Sea. Efforts to find another oil play on the Atlantic margin continue but are likely to be doomed, because the essential prolific Jurassic source-rocks, if present at all, are now too deeply buried to generate oil. The isolated large deposits, West of the Shetlands, are effectively freak occurrences depending on unique re-migration from earlier accumulations. The scope for gas in this province is more promising, but it will not be cheap.

Britain's brief oil age is in decline. The major companies are withdrawing to be replaced by smaller companies, mopping up satellite fields and step-outs, as well as scavenging tail end production from ageing platforms.

Oil production is set to decline at 7-8% a year on the basis of the current depletion rate, falling to less than half its present level by 2010. Britain currently consumes 1.75 Mb/d, making it a net importer on a steeply rising trend. With a population of 60 M, per capita consumption stands at about 11 b/a. Britain exported much of its flush production at a time of depressed oil prices, to which its exports contributed, but now faces buying imports at high prices. It furthermore may find some of its production being exported by the foreign companies who own it, despite growing domestic needs. It would be hard to imagine a less appropriate policy by which to have managed the depletion of a national resource.

Gas production is more difficult to forecast due its very different depletion profile. About 100 Tcf have been discovered, of which about 80 Tcf have been consumed. Production reached a peak of 3.8 Tcf/a in 2000 and is now falling at about 12% a year. The compressors are running flat out on the old southern North Sea fields. At this rate, production will end around 2020 as confirmed by the Government Department responsible. Accordingly, the demand for imports is set to rise radically in the years ahead, but the rest of Europe (except Norway) is in the same predicament relying on ever more distant sources, including especially Siberia. Recent events in the Ukraine underline the control exercised by the transit countries which may prefer to meet their own needs first and gain financial rewards from the control they exercise.

The original assessment, written in this newsletter in 2000, correctly anticipated soaring energy costs from around 2010 or sooner in the event of a US attack on Iraq. Gas and electricity prices have already almost doubled over the past year.

It is difficult to imagine how the country will survive the Second Half of the Age of Oil. Even in the present conditions of affluence, it seems to be subject to a high level of crime and violence with growing tensions from the large immigrant factions, some of whom deeply resent the Government's decision to invade Iraq. The newspapers are full of the threats of Terrorism, although there has in fact only been one incident. There is an old political adage for the successful politician if you don't have an enemy, make one, but it does not seem to have served the present government. There are plans for the re-introduction of Identity Cards, last seen in the Second World War.

Failure by the Government to recognise natural depletion until too late has left the country unprepared, although it now speaks of the re-development of nuclear power, unpopular as it is. Re-commissioning old abandoned coal mines will prove difficult and costly. The growing contribution of solar, wind, wave, and tide power will be useful, indeed vital, but insufficient so support anywhere near the present population in its current condition.

In these circumstances, the United Kingdom may become less united as Scotland and Wales gain greater control of their destinies with their own legislatures, and as ethnic groups rediscover their identity for survival. Pressures against further European integration are likely to mount, as the outdated nature of its economic and financial principles become more evident. If the dollar faces a massive devaluation as seems increasingly likely, funds would at first flow to the euro, which in turn would then come under pressure. Stirling might accordingly reap at least a temporary benefit. Perhaps the best hope is that Europe, including Britain, should rediscover the Treaty of Maastricht which encourages regionalism under the slogan that no decision should be taken at any level higher than it need be.

Colin Campbell, ASPO Newsletter No. 63 - March 2006

I'd already read the UK assessment in the ASPO newsletter but it's good to see it reproduced here (excellent idea to produce the 'UK OilDrum' site btw).

It seems a fair summary of the situation but I've reservations about the tail of production stretching out as far as 2050 as per the above graph. At the Offshore Europe Exhibition and Conference held at Aberdeen in Sept'05 (which I attended) speakers referred to a relatively short 'window of opportunity' to develop remaining N Sea prospects.  This limitation is due to a combination of the design life of major NS infrastructure together with decreasing size of new discoveries.  Structures built in the 1970's such as Brent, Forties and Frigg pipelines will be at the end of their design life by around 2020 and would doubtless then require huge investments to offset the ever present problem of corrosion.

There are some major structures built later (such as CATS, c1990) but most of the key NS infrastructure will be retired by or soon after 2020 and subsequent new discoveries would need to be large (or several medium sized finds close together) to justify the effort necessary to bring the oil / gas ashore beyond this point.  I know the economists will point to prices being much higher by then to justify the investment but I suspect a lot of the problem will be down to energy economics whereby the energy required to build and maintain the infrastructure will approach the energy recovered from the (by then) small oil and gas deposits.

On this basis I would envisage a sharper and earlier production cutoff, and well before 2050.

Chris

On this basis I would envisage a sharper and earlier production cutoff, and well before 2050.
I expect you're right. I don't think the post peak curves Campbell draws are his estimation as to what will happen in the real world. They only represent the geological potential of a province, that's what could physically be achieved if there were no limits except the geological ones. Thanks for your informed comments.
Old platforms are a bit like a used car.
You dont want to be the last person to own it
or you will be the one who drags it to the
breakers yard.
I am in no position to correct or qualify Colin Campbell's remarks concerning oil depletion but the small paragraph describing the future political situation is a bit like reading a newspaper horoscope. It all sounds plausible but a little light on detail. If there's anything certain about predicting the future of the US economy and the dollar it is that nothing is certain. Both Michael Ruppert and Richard Heinberg predicted bad things for the year just past but it just didn't happen. Once again the PO commentariat are predicting the same but we'll have to wait and see.
As for the unpopularity of nuclear energy...I haven't seen any figures but when people realise the state we might find ourselves in then they'll fall quietly into line behind the 'neutral' Malcolm Wicks and co.
As for the comment about the contribution of renewables etc. I think we'll have to wait and see how people react to a smaller contracting economy...I think there may be more than the odd 10 million who breathe a sigh of relief and muck in to make things work. I think we should give people a bit more credit than simply asking are they smarter than yeast etc.?
Lastly....start supporting this site everyone!!! This could be the most valuable site for UKers but you have to contribute!!!
Campbell does indeed mix in quite a few of his personal judgments.  Some I would have no argument with ... "It would be hard to imagine a less appropriate policy by which to have managed the depletion of a national resource."  The entire life cycle of the North Sea looks like it will take place in the course of my adult life (I am 56 now).

However, when he talks about "a massive devaluation (of the Dollar) as seems increasingly likely", I wonder against which strong currencies the Dollar with have this massive fall.  Probably not against the UK Pound. If I read this assessment correctly, the energy situation in the UK is probably even more daunting than that in the USA.

The UK and US share an approach which will (is) costing both dearly. A country has to make its way in the world by earning foreign revenue to buy foreign goods. In UK / US we used the "gift" of oil and mineral resources to get out of the tedious business of earning a living. Countries which are resource based can set up "future funds" (see Norway and now UAE, Qatar and even SA) to take over when they can no longer pump / dig up a standard of living. Countries with little natural resource have had to work. Singapore has only its people and its location so it works and invests to be the best educated place on the planet, the best connected and generally so useful "foreigners" will pay for its services. Japan imports almost all its raw materials. They have trudged through a relative recession but are coming out with a capability in many areas that is saleable. The UK / US are doing / have done none of these things. The City of London is world class and earns a good (foreign currency) living but it cannot carry the rest of the country. Thus coming to your point both the £ and $US are long term weak currencies but the $US has the reserve currency advantage right now which will give it a bit longer.
I would have to generally agree with PhilM's comment that 'the small paragraph describing the future political situation is a bit like reading a newspaper horoscope. It all sounds plausible but a little light on detail.'

My take on the peak oil movement is that it's a progressive one--American survivalists excepting--with an analytical overview of the global system. I think there are sections in his commentary where Campbell strayed out of his area of expertise and compromised his credibility, particularly with his takes on British immigration and empire.

I tried to post commentary on this assessment a couple of days back but it wasn't added, so here goes.  

The discussion/linkage of Britain's current and future welfare with the 'immigrant' population was a tad unsettling. His idea that the simmering immigrant 'factions' held 'deep' resentment over Iraq, seemed to miss the point;'deep' resentment over Iraq in Britain crosses racial, religious, political and class lines. And the idea that various 'immigrant cities have developed, some becoming almost small replicas of Karachi or Kingston, Jamaica', also needs to be picked up on. Actually, only the London Boroughs of Newham and Brent have majority, heterogeneous, non-white populations in Britain. Just to say that while Brixton is 60% white, Kingston isn't. Rather than 'almost small (???)replicas of Karachi or Kingston', I would say that these are multicultural areas of 21st century Britain.

He writes about the 'massive' immigration to Britain, but when compared to European immigration to America, Australia, Brazil etc, Commonwealth immigration into Britain, in scale and effect, was small.

Other than mentioning colonial forced labour policies and resulting immiseration and displacement, as well as war crimes in Kenya and Malaya, I don't want to dwell too much on  his statement that the Empire 'brought order and fair administration to much of the world'.

Otherwise, a good article.