Stories tagged with "reserves"
Reserves and Resources
Posted by Heading Out on October 8, 2009 - 10:44am
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: clean coal, natural gas, natural gas prices, reserves [list all tags]
In trying to estimate the size of the problem that will face the world as the available reserves of fossil fuel begin to decline, one has to make some assumptions about the size of the volumes that are available. It is a debate that can lead to people talking past one another if they make different assumptions about the size of those reserves. This holds true in discussions that dot the web sites of those that write about energy, whether writing about oil, natural gas, coal or uranium.
The issue that becomes important is the fact that the amount of oil, coal, natural gas or uranium that can be economically extracted varies with the price of the fuel.

Peak Oil Not a Problem According to NY Times; Scientific American - Our Response on the Financial Aspects
Posted by Gail the Actuary on September 26, 2009 - 10:40am
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: new york times, peak oil, reserves, scientific american [list all tags]
Recently, we have had two new articles aiming to put to rest people's fears about peak oil. One is from the New York Times:
Oil Industry Sets a Brisk Pace of New Discoveries
It talks about the many discoveries this year, and how, if they continue at the pace they have in the first half, they will be the best since 2000.
The other is from the October Scientific American, called
Squeezing More Oil from the Ground.
It is behind a pay wall (you can get it for $5.95). There is also a draft version available on line. Its premise seems to be that there are a lot of promising areas that we have not yet explored. When you put this together with advances in drilling and the promises of secondary and tertiary recovery, there is a good chance that oil production will not peak for many years.
In this post, we will look a little more at these articles, and see why peak oil, and perhaps the financial issues associated with peak oil, are still an issue, regardless of what these articles may suggest.
How Technology Increases Oil Production
Posted by Phil Hart on July 17, 2008 - 10:00am in The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: eor, indonesia, oil companies, original, reserves, technology [list all tags]
How can you double something and still have ten times less than you started with?
| The answer to this question will help us reassess claims that advances in oil field technology will postpone the peak in global oil production. The question itself arises from a case study of Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Handil Oil Field in Indonesia. |

Shedding Light on the Question of Reserves Growth
Posted by Phil Hart on December 7, 2007 - 11:30am in The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand
Topic: Geology/Exploration
Tags: reserves, reserves growth [list all tags]

USGS World Petroleum Assessment
In 2000, the United States Geological Survey issued its World Petroleum Assessment, covering the thirty year period 1995-2025 (Table 1). The resource estimates from this study are widely quoted to support the argument that oil production can continue to expand. (Comments now open!)
A few more thoughts on Saudi and HL
Posted by Luis de Sousa on October 22, 2007 - 8:50am in The Oil Drum: Europe
Topic: Geology/Exploration
Tags: hubbert linearization, reserves, saudi arabia, urr [list all tags]
There has been some discussion about how to apply the Hubbert Linearization (HL) to Saudi historical production in recent weeks at TOD. Trying not to fall into redundancy, let me have some loose thoughts on these models:

Three alternative Logistic models for Saudi production. Click for large version.
Peak Minerals
Posted by Chris Vernon on October 15, 2007 - 1:00pm in The Oil Drum: Europe
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: aspo, m. king hubbert, minerals, peak, reserves, usgs [list all tags]
-
Abstract: We examined the world production of 57 minerals reported in the database of the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Of these, we found 11 cases where production has clearly peaked and is now declining. Several more may be peaking or be close to peaking. Fitting the production curve with a logistic function we see that, in most cases, the ultimate amount extrapolated from the fitting corresponds well to the amount obtained summing the cumulative production so far and the reserves estimated by the USGS. These results are a clear indication that the Hubbert model is valid for the worldwide production of minerals and not just for regional cases. It strongly supports the concept that “Peak oil” is just one of several cases of worldwide peaking and decline of a depletable resource. Many more mineral resources may peak worldwide and start their decline in the near future.
Saudi Arabia - production forecasts and reserves estimates
Posted by Euan Mearns on August 30, 2007 - 10:27am in The Oil Drum: Europe
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: aspo, colin campbell, original, production forecast, reserves, saudi arabia [list all tags]
In his recent post, Ace assumes ultimate recoverable reserves (URR) in Saudi Arabia to be 175 Gb (billion barrels). With 112 Gb already produced, that leaves only 63 Gb remaining. Colin Campbell (the founder of ASPO) has estimated total reserves for Saudi Arabia of 275 Gb (news letter 66), believed to be C+C+NGL (crude oil + condensate + natural gas liquids). There is an enormous discrepancy between this and Ace's analysis that ought to be explained.

This post is a brief summary of my views on Saudi reserves and production. My conclusion is that Saudi Arabia likely has at least 120 Gbs of remaining reserves (C+C+NGL) for a URR in excess of 240 Gbs (C+C+NGL). The remaining reserves according to this analysis are almost double those reported by Ace.
Easy Come, Easy Go..
Posted by Libelle on August 1, 2007 - 9:30am in The Oil Drum: Canada
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: canada, coal bed methane, lng, natural gas, reserves, resources, united states [list all tags]
Easy Come, Easy Go, or: The Incredible Disappearing 140 Tcf of Canadian Gas.
I posted an article "The Future of (Natural) Gas from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin?" a few months ago, suggesting that the numbers suggested for Western Canadian gas in the NRCan report "Canadian Natural Gas Review of 2004 & Outlook to 2020" were exceedingly optimistic, basing that conclusion on both National Energy Board Scenarios and actual events. I did not expect that the next NRCan report in the series would reflect this view, but it has since come out, and its contents prompted me to look further back in the series and then to look at how other official and unofficial assessments were changing.
The Round-Up: July 26th 2007
Posted by Stoneleigh on July 26, 2007 - 1:21am in The Oil Drum: Canada
Topic: Miscellaneous
Tags: arctic, derivatives, drilling, electricity, flooding, liquidity, margin call, natural gas, nuclear, oil sands, oil spill, peak oil, reserves [list all tags]
As oil threatens to go through the roof over concerns that OPEC may not open the spigots, exploiting Canadian reserves is becoming far more expensive. The threat of labour disruption in the oil sands will only add to the problem.
An OPEC equivalent controlling future LNG trade is seen as a threat to US security, even as natural gas prices decline and the drilling sector consolidates in Canada.
Burnaby BC comes to terms with a long clean up after an oil spill, as the aftermath of a Japanese earthquake rattles the nuclear industry, and Ontario's nuclear troubles continue.
Risk aversion goes international as credit markets tighten around the world. Faced with threatened deals, banks are holding on to loans rather than hawking them to investors. The US sends another more senior figure to China to convince them to buy mortgage-backed securities. As bridge loans become pier loans in the developing credit crunch, Wall Street 'heads for the diaper aisle'.
Oil firms find reserves elusive
For investors looking for the cheapest reserve replacement costs, don't turn to Canada. Not only is the country's oil and gas basin particularly well-developed, making new reserves hard to find, but also Alberta's oil sands boom has driven up service costs above and beyond the increase seen globally. Canada's senior producers' reserve replacement costs went up 40 per cent from 2005 to 2006, while the country's energy trusts and juniors saw costs increase year over year by 62 per cent and 37 per cent, respectively, according to the report.
"The unrelenting rise in reserve replacement costs, coupled with cost pressures elsewhere, has significantly eroded the profitability of crude oil and natural gas developments, especially in high-cost regions such as Western Canada," Mr. Ollenberger said.
Coal reserves and resources - a gentle cough
Posted by Heading Out on July 24, 2007 - 11:00am
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: coal, eroi, reserves, resources, united states, world [list all tags]
I have written recently about some of the reasons that coal reserves, as currently understood, might not be quite as large, at present, as they are assumed to be. However, while I could continue on that tack for some additional time, it is perhaps time to give a gentle cough and suggest that there is perhaps a little terminologically inexact thinking in some of the discussions on the actual size of reserves, relative to the overall resource and that there is another viewpoint that should be considered in this debate. Particularly this relates to how much is left and how long it will last.
Firstly it should be recognized that a number of studies of coal reserves have put caveats on their numbers along the lines of “under current operating and economic conditions.” And so let me first put back up the table I posted in my last post , relating to the coal reserves of the UK back in 1952.

Note that this is coal that has largely been proved to be in place. However, in the time frame between 1952 and today it has not been mined or gone away, but it has become, at present, uneconomic to mine. And thus under current conditions it is no longer a reserve. And the one thing that those who write here should know better about assuming is the “current conditions.” Jeepers! We have spent over two years here accumulating convincing evidence that current conditions are not sustainable, and yet that argument is accepted, with little discussion, when it is proposed.


k Nation (Jim Kunstler)






GAIA Host Collective