Nigeria is a Mess and Getting Worse

Let's take an in-depth view of the the ever-worsening potential oil shock in Nigeria and its implications for US imports and world oil prices.

First, for some background. Almost of all of Nigeria's cuurent production of about 2.6/mbpd comes from the onshore Niger Delta region shown here.

 
Click to Enlarge
[break]

Let's look at some basic supply and export numbers first. From the EIA Nigeria Country Brief

Most importantly, as recently as November of 2005, Nigeria was the 4th largest crude oil exporter to the US--1.163/mbpd.

Oil and Gas Journal (1/1/05) estimates Nigeria's proven oil reserved at 35.2 billion barrels. The Nigerian government plans to expand its proven reserves to 40 billion barrels by 2010. The majority of reserves are found along the country's coastal Niger River Delta, with the majority of the oil located in approximately 250 small (i.e., less than 50 million barrels each) fields. At least 200 other fields contain undisclosed reserves.

Nigeria is the largest oil producer in Africa and the eleventh largest in the world, averaging 2.5 million barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2004. In August 2004, Nigeria's finance minister announced plans to produce 2.6 million bbl/d of oil in 2005. The Nigerian government plans to increase oil production to 3 million bb/d in 2006 and 4 million bbl/d in 2010.

Are these kinds of projections realistic at all given the escalating violence and civil unrest there?

Problems in Nigeria

The causes of unrest in the Niger Delta region are not hard to understand. But a good place to start is with Nigeria's president Olusegun Obasanjo.


Good Friends — President Bush and Nigeria's
President Olusegun Obasanjo

From the Christian Science Monitor article — "Yet Shell and other oil companies pay the government royalties and taxes that amounted to a whopping $27 billion in 2004. This is one of the world's most corrupt countries, however, and much of the oil money disappears into personal accounts of officials" — naturally, the corruption starts at the top.

Needless to say, the ethnic groups living in the Niger Delta itself do not benefit from any of this oil revenue and thus large scale oil production stands side by side with great poverty in the region.

Next to an impoverished settlement of mud houses and rusted zinc roofs lies the Utorogu oil facility run by Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria's oil-rich Niger Delta. As a giant tongue of flame leaps repeatedly in the wind - making a ferocious hissing sound as its fire feeds on disused natural gas from a pipeline - local women keep a respectable distance to dry their cassava flakes in its heat.

"The opportunity to dry our farm produce by this fire is the only benefit we derive from having oil in our land," said Reivu Umukoro, a 38-year-old mother of four among the women.

According to Umukoro, while oil workers who run the Shell facility and Nigerian troops who guard them live in air-conditioned comfort, the Utorogu community nearby manages without electricity, potable water, and health amenities.

There has also been substantial environmental damage in the region including natural gas flaring, ruptured pipelines and other accidents.

  
On July 21, 2005, the pipeline that runs near here ruptured. Streams of black goo oozed into farmers' fields and a fishing creek. Because of a complicated dispute between villagers and the major oil company in this region, Royal Dutch Shell, the oil hasn't been cleaned up. Black residue still covers thousands of plants.

Residents are angry. "We will face Shell," says village chairman Daniel Oweh surrounded by agitated young men. "The next stage will be violent."

The levels of violence are now increasing rapidly. As much as (or more than) 100/kbpd are either shut-in due to attacks on oil facilities or pipelines. The EIA has estimated that in 2004 139/kbpd of production were being disrupted on a daily basis due to attacks on oil facilities or sabotage. For example, the EIA states that "in December 2004, SPDC and ChevronTexaco suspended Nigerian oil exports of 134,000 bbl/d due to unrest in the Niger Delta. In January 2005, ChevronTexaco announced that it was losing 140,000 bbl/d of oil due to the closure of facilities in the Niger Delta". In other cases the oil is just bunkered (stolen) by militant groups to support their activities and buy weapons.

One important player — no doubt, a self-serving African chieftain and despot on the rise — is Alhaji Dokubo-Asari (shown at right) a prominent member of the Niger Delta Ijaw ethnic group and militant head of the Niger Delta People's Volunteer Force (NDPVF). In fact, after President Obasanjo threw him in jail last September, one of the four MEND demands after kidnapping the oil workers recently was for his release. Alhaji Dokubo-Asari seeks to create a new country in the Niger Delta, taking the oil money with it.

The situation in the Niger Delta is so chaotic and unstable that it is impossible to do it justice in a short post. However, in August of 2005 NPR's Steve Inskeep "traveled to Nigeria for two weeks to see firsthand a country of increasing importance to America's oil-driven economy". It is a series of 7 reports examining various aspects of the problem entitled Oil Money Divides Nigeria. Only partial transcripts are available online but there are complete audio segments for each story available at the cited link. So if you are interested in learning more and have a broadband connection, I highly recommend that you listen to these stories. You will hear unbelievable stuff about the precarious nature of the situation there.

Violence, sabotage and kidnapping are now a daily occurrence in the Niger Delta. Oil company operations are almost all heavily fortified and protected by Nigerian army troops. The situation is a mess and getting worse. And the latest news is ominous. From the The poverty of oil wealth in Nigeria's delta link cited above, we learn

"This release [of the kidnapped oil workers] does not signify a ceasefire or softening of our position to destroy the oil export capability of the Nigerian government," MEND said in an email to reporters. The group said it soon would launch fresh attacks aimed at cutting Nigeria's exports by 30 per cent in February. It warned all foreign oil workers to leave as new hostages taken by the group would not be freed....

An expert security study commissioned by Shell two years ago fingered illegal sale of crude oil as the major source of funds for illegal weapons now awash in the region. An average of 1,000 lives are being lost in the region every year due to militia violence, the report said, predicting that at the current pace of violence Shell may be forced to abandon all onshore oil production in Nigeria by 2008.

And although we have the usual assurances from President Obasanjo that all will be well,
What remains is to see how the government plans to pacify the armed militants, who have vowed that oil will no longer flow without their consent, and have mastery of the delta's maze of rivers and creeks so far impenetrable to the military.
Nigeria may not be in the same league as Saudi Arabia or Russia but it is a very important exporter to both the US and Europe and is counted on to increase exports in the future. As reported in the CS Monitor article, David Goldwyn, a former US assistant energy secretary who now consults in the region says, "the loss of more Nigerian oil could send the price to $80 or $95 per barrel or higher.... The likelihood of a significant disruption always has to be counted as relatively high". If MEND makes good on its promise to reduce Nigerian exports by 30% in the near future, that will have a significant affect in the US and other importers of Nigerian oil.

To put this in perspective, the 4 other largest oil exporters to the US are Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. Mexico seems to be about to tip over into permanent declines (given Cantarell), Hugo Chavez has shown some inclination to sell his oil to China instead, Saudi Arabia has the usual uncertainties we're all familiar with and in Canada, production is flat despite the over-hyped promise of tar sands from Alberta. So, Nigeria is looking pretty important in the overall scheme of things in the near term. And the way things look now, the likelihood of a significant disruption of oil exports from Nigeria must be taken very seriously indeed in 2006.

(Original introduction has been moved down here...tied to the news of that day...)

Things are not looking good in Nigeria (also pointed out by Leanan):

Armed militants carried out a wave of attacks across Nigeria's troubled Niger delta on Saturday, blowing up oil and gas pipelines and seizing nine foreign oil workers.
[editor's note, by Prof. Goose] Originally posted 2/3.

Earlier this week, Nymex LS crude prices for March delivery surpassed $68/barrel mostly over concerns about Iran. But that was not the only reason. In Behind rising oil cost: Nigeria, the Christian Science Monitor reported that —

Unrest in the country's oil-rich delta region helped to drive crude prices this week to $66 a barrel... [break]

Militants calling themselves the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta [MEND] are holding the four hostages - an American, a Briton, a Bulgarian, and a Honduran. They have threatened even more aggressive moves against oil workers and their families soon. Shell has evacuated 330 employees.

Already, two attacks in recent days on some of Shell's roughly 1,000 oil wells and 80 pumping stations caused a drop of 220,000 barrels a day in output - nearly 10 percent of Nigeria's 2.5 million barrels a day in exports.

Those hostages have subsequently been freed, but the situation is heating up and this article The poverty of oil wealth in Nigeria's delta indicates that levels of violence and disruption to oil supplies are escalating fast.
Both the military sophistication and the ferocity of the attacks have surprised the Nigerian military and oil industry officials already used to militant violence in the Niger Delta. The militants launched a commando raid on Shell's EA platform just over nine kilometers into the shallow waters of the Atlantic off the delta coast, evading navy patrols in the area, in order to take hostages including a security expert hired to prevent that very type of occurrence.

In the attack on Shell's Benisede facility four days later, the militants fired rockets on the quarters housing troops stationed to guard the installation to put them out of action, before using explosives to level the facility. The Nigerian military said four soldiers were killed in that attack, while another 11 are still missing and presumed dead.

I knew Nigeria was an important part of the energy picture, but I wasn't aware of just how important.  (I suppose it should be obvious that the oil exports of any one conutry are "important" when the market is as tight as it is right now.)  Thanks for posting this, Dave.

Perhaps we should get a betting pool going on how long before we start hearing that Nigeria is amassing WMD's.  Somebody give Colin Powell a call and tell him to sharpen his pencils so he can draw more pretty pictures for the UN.

Nigeria's oil is mostly sweet light "the good stuff"  which makes it all the more important, given that sweet light production has peaked. The loss of Nigeria would has a huge impact on the market. Their production is not replacable. The SPR is mostly heavy sour...
Do you know the % sour of the Total?  I haven't been able to find that.
I seem to recall that around 75% is sour.
Given that there is almost no spare capacity left on the planet to make up a loss of up to 800KpD (30%)of high quality oil, does any of this enter in the contempletions/calculations on those intent on militarily intervening in Iran?

I mean, come on.  We are already losing production due to depletion in our own county and in most of our "hemispheric" suppliers (Mexico, and Venuzuela).  Now add Nigeria and then we haven't even got to hurricane season, a stepped up Iraq insurgency (or heck even a continued lack of investment and repair) taking out even more iraqi crude.  And then we cavalierly assume some surgical strike WONT have oil reprecussions (or minor ones).  McCain's insane comment to the effect that some higher prices might have to be paid to see that Iran does not go nuc-you-lar.  

How high??

It's one thing to try and grab resources when there are other spare resources for others to grab.  But when you are already in the hole and experiencing a minor oil crisis, why make it worse, much worse.  Anybody consider that maybe the best laid plans of this administration just might not turn out how we like they expected??

Is anybody considering the whole picture?  

The whole picture is "Demand Destruction."

Profiting off a dieing System-think Enron.

And war-"The Bush administration has said it is planning to spend $120bn (�68bn) on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars this year, bringing their total cost so far to $440bn.The spending request, which will soon be presented to Congress, marks a 20% increase over last year, despite plans to draw down US troop levels in both war zones in the coming months.

And-

THE GUERRILLA OIL CARTEL

The control over the price of oil is now in the hands of global guerrillas.

And notice how you'll never hear Al Qaeda and oil/oil infrastructure
in the same sentence?  If Al Qaeda's not a Secret Service construct,
how come Al Qaeda didn't crash those planes into the Houston Ship
Channel?  Or if say Bunfield/London was caused by a crashing plane, would
a government talk about it?

Hey no problem.  440 B is only the price of about 20 months USA import supply (@60).  If the price goes up, the payback time is even less.  Wish I could get my project economics down to a level that good.

Terrorist control of the oil price could be negated with a meaningfull energy reduction program.  Why not spend the 440 B giving credits towards hybred cars for anyone recycling a SUV or other guzzler.  The Army could buy them up, transport them to Iraq and rent them to the high paid USA contractors.  They could afford to fill them up there with that cheap Halliburton Brand gas.

Problem solved.

Hey: A guy with your oilfield experience should know Halliburton doesn't produce or sell sub-surface gas. What kind are you referring to?
Ya i know.  I needed a way to loosly refer to the fuels they are supposedly using in Iraq.  They stand accused of fruad by inflating the transportation cost and then rebilling the US Government for the inflated price.  

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35138-2005Mar14.html

Apparently they're buying fuel somewhere in Turkey for less than $100,000 and then charge a staggering 27,000,000 to transport it to Iraq.  True, I haven't been able to find out the kind of fuel or what volume was purchased that would require such a high transportation fee, but if I take the 27million and assume a super high transportation cost of 25cents/gal that gives me a minimum volume of 108 million gallons of fuel.  Then that figures the price/gallon is 0.00075 or 75 cents FOR A 1000 GAL (I want some of that!) and you still need about 8000 trucks to move it.  Logistics problem.  Highly improbable numbers in any case.

Maybe they air freighted it in with 500 KC-111s with fighter escorts.

  It's become such a major military ally on the side of evil this intertwining of oil and terrorism. Talk of spending for credits on hybrid cars as military budgeting sounds a bit like Carter in the 70s. We laughed then. We're not laughing now. Oil under the ownership of military enemies was a problem seen clearly back then, and we started to take the right steps. Had we continued on that path, think of how much easier it would be to carry out our war on terrorism now. Any reasonable military action America takes in this war is viewed by most of the world, allies badly needed, as an immoral grab for oil. Any national security steps we take anywhere near an oil well is viewed as criminal. If we would be making all our fuel and plastic more cheaply from sources other than oil, it would be just America vs those that commit atrocities like 9/11. And we would have nearly all the world militarily on our side.
The so-called 'ShockWave' report includes 'unrest in Nigeria' as one of their scenarios.

http://www.energycommission.org/ewebeditpro/items/O82F6801.pdf

I'm sure wealth disparities, neglect, corruption and abuse in Nigeria go a long way to explain the unrest there. I'm surprised, however, that I've not seen any stories about potential geopolitics of the situation.

If I were a leader in Russia, say, or another country (or group) arguably not primarily motivated by benign good will towards the U.S., and, say, still reeling somewhat by a generation's war experience in Afghanistan (or other perceived historical U.S. aggression or competitive threat), wouldn't I be tempted to support groups like MEND by way of rendering the U.S. weaker?

Is it not happening, I wonder? Have I simply missed reporting on it, or is it happening but not getting reported, or is it taboo because we'd hate to give someone the idea if by some chance it hadn't occurred to them? Oops. Or maybe we wouldn't like raised the idea that U.S. aggressions might spawn future such paybacks?

Geoplitics? There are none. This is Africa we're talking about. It's 2006, not 1886. They have nothing but oil. We want it. End of story. You feel sorry for the people who live in Bonny? Then stop driving a car.
That answer is simply too flip.  Come on; you can do better than that.
Maybe it sounded flip, but it was concise. I know a little about African history, politics, and oil-history and I could go on all day about it. But you can boil it all down to my above comment. Making the issues more complicated really doesn't serve any purpose.

African oil-rentier states make those in the Mid-East look like Norway. Nothing short of completely dictating how their economies are run will change anything. Look at Chad and its run-in with the World Bank.

And the poor people - if you stoppes buying the countries oil - they would have even less than the nothing they have now. Maybe you have a solution.

Ever heard of Ken Saro-Wiwe? I don't even think Nigeria makes the list of countries the US has a problem with.

Ken Saro-Wiwa was a corrupt demagogue who, by the magic of PR, managed to turn himself into a hero.
Really? The common understanding was that he was executed for something he didn't do. Maybe you'd like to enlighten us.
Yes, he was executed for a crime he either didn't commit, (or at least wasn't proven to have committed). That doesn't make him innocent either of being a demagogue or of being corrupt. He enriched himself by corruption when he was a Commissioner under the Gowon military government in the 1970s. Maybe his later activism under Abacha was a good thing on balance, but he was certainly a demagogue.
That maybe so, but I don't think this is really about Saro-Wiwe's previous transgressions. It's about the Nigerian Government's role. What about the other 9 people excuted with him? Were they equally deserving of their ends in your opinion?
The final eloquent words of Ken Saro Wiwa:

My lord,

We all stand before history. I am a man of peace, of ideas. Appalled by the denigrating poverty of my people who live on a richly endowed land, distressed by their political marginalization and economic strangulation, angered by the devastation of their land, their ultimate heritage, anxious to preserve their right to life and to a decent living, and determined to usher to this country as a whole a fair and just democratic system which protects everyone and every ethnic group and gives us all a valid claim to human civilization, I have devoted my      intellectual and material resources, my very life, to a cause in which I have total belief and from which I cannot be blackmailed or intimidated.

I have no doubt at all about the ultimate success of my cause, no matter the trials and tribulations which I and those who believe with me may encounter on our journey. Nor imprisonment nor death can stop our ultimate victory.

I repeat that we all stand before history. I and my colleagues are not the only ones on trial. Shell is here on trial and it is as well that it is represented by counsel said to be holding a watching brief.

The Company has, indeed, ducked this particular trial, but its day will surely come and the lessons learnt here may prove useful to it for there is no doubt in my mind that the ecological war that the Company has waged in the Delta will be called to question sooner than later and the crimes of that war be duly punished. The crime of the Company's dirty wars against the Ogoni people will also be punished.

On trial also is the Nigerian nation, its present rulers and those who assist them. Any nation which can do to the weak and disadvantaged what the Nigerian nation has done to the Ogoni, loses a claim to independence and to freedom from outside influence.

I am not one of those who shy away from protesting injustice and oppression, arguing that they are expected in a military regime. The military do not act alone. They are supported by a gaggle of politicians, lawyers, academics and businessmen, all of them hiding under the claim that they are only doing their duty, men and women too afraid to wash their pants of urine. ...

As we subscribe to the sub-normal and accept double standards, as we lie and cheat openly, as we protect injustice and oppression, we empty our classrooms, denigrate our hospitals, fill our stomachs with hunger and elect to make ourselves the slaves of those who ascribe to higher standards, pursue the truth, and honor justice, freedom, and hard work.

I predict that the scene here will be played and replayed by generations yet unborn. Some have already cast themselves in the role of villains, some are tragic victims, some still have a chance to redeem themselves. The choice is for each individual. I predict that the denouement of the riddle of the Niger delta will soon come. The agenda is being set at this trial. Whether the peaceful ways I have favored will prevail depends on what the oppressor decides, what signals it sends out to the waiting public.

In my innocence of the false charges I face here, in my utter conviction, I call upon the Ogoni people, the peoples of the Niger delta, and the oppressed ethnic minorities of Nigeria to stand up now and fight fearlessly and peacefully for their rights.

History is on their side. God is on their side. For the Holy Quran says in Sura 42, verse 41: "All those that fight when oppressed incur no guilt, but Allah shall punish the oppressor." Come the day.

--Kenule Beeson Saro-Wiwa

It appears that the "denouement of the riddle of the Niger delta ... " is soon upon us

You just missed it. Check the anti war, anti oil and other environmental sites to find out where trouble is brewing. This kinda stuff don't get to CNN until its already history, past the point of no return and everyone else is wondering where the hell this came from and what the hell anybody can do about it. Colombia, Bolivia, Cameroon, Angola, Chad, Somalia, Indonesia, Philippnes.. its not all about oil either. Just oil is a good target to disrupt government revenues to purchase arms and troops to put the revolutionaries into submission, and guaranteed to get attention, so they go after the wells and pipelines first (if there are any around) Check Napal. No oil involvement there, but the SHTF there too.
A local Rotary club in Cambria California, near Hearst Castle, sent the FIRST team late last year to northern Nigeria to do polio vaccines. It was well supported locally/Nigerian nationally, but it was the first team that went into the field EVER from Rotary and Rotary has a goal (within reach) of eliminating polio off the planet. (Remember two years ago when this was a plot to introduce AIDS by Christian whites?)

Recall that Nigeria is the highest populated nation in Africa and in the 1970's was racked by civil war between the dominate ethnic group and the Christian Ibo's.

By the way, not everything in life/world is about oil. Close though.

I would add to this quite excellent and timely post that Nigeria currently has a total fertility rate of 5.9 and projected to more than double in population by 2050.  This has major implications for the country's stability.  
What stability were you referring to?
Oh, Nigeria's stability, sorry, not the US. Seems to me that the regime could start spending more oil revenues on citizens, try to lift them out of poverty and the result would be to use more of their own oil resources.  Or, just continue the high birthrate, corrupt descent into chaos that is going on now.  Not good either way.
I think his point was that Nigeria is anything but stable.
Geologically speaking, Africa's probably the last region in the world that could significantly increase its production of sweet, light crude.  Politically speaking is a different story, of course.

Methinks Shell made a big mistake, not helping the locals directly while they could.  They might have made a big difference with a relatively small investment.

Not only Shell.  BP-Amoco on the BTC Pipeline in Turkey worth about $1.5 billion in the Turkish segment.  Local aid: their construction contractor was busting local businesses by buying their gasoline from local pumps, billing personnel in local hotels, renting camp power generators, contract medical services, catering... and not paying the bills.  Locals broke past security with guns trying to find the finance manager so they could try to get him to pay the bills.  BP will tell you its not their fault.  Why? Because they cleverly structured the Turkish contract so that BOTAS was technically responsible for everything.  Hands clean.
That's what I call "penny wise and pound foolish."
As in £
Nigeria is not really a nation-state; more accurate descriptions would be that it is a state of distress, a kleptocracy, a specific example of petrolism combined with tribalism, thuggery, pervasive corruption, poverty and the population trap.

There is no hope whatsover for Nigeria at this point. Conditions are so bad that neither Russia nor China would get involved (especially after the bad experiences the Soviet Union had when it messed around in Africa a few decades ago).

Nigeria is a horror movie that is going to go on and on and get worse and worse. In its future is far more genocide, rapid increase in death rates from multiple causes, and an increased flow of oil money overseas. Unless you have a magic wand to stop the movie, there is nothing constructive you can do except to help your Nigerian friends to escape the country. As individuals, many Nigerians are wonderful people, but they know what is happening; however, given the power of the kleptocrats who rule the country there is nothing the citizenry can do except to riot occasionally to express their despair.

The above post needs to be read and understood. Somebody had to say it, I'm glad it didn't have to be me this time. No truer words have been written.
Look, I'm not going to argue that Nigeria isn't in horrendous shape.  But it's way too convenient to wash our hands of the whole situation by saying that it's hopeless.  

Nigeria is not Congo, for instance, where over 3 million people have died in the last 10 years and there truly is no government in most of the country. So the situation could get much worse;  the flip side is that while making things much better for Nigeria may be too much to hope for in the short term, there could easily be things we could do to prevent it from getting worse.  Not all of those things even have to involve oil.

At this point, any attempt at "regime change" by the United States in Nigeria would be viewed with great suspicion by much of the rest of the world. And further, how do you stabilize the region? The militant forces appear well-organized and now have a goal - they want that profit for themselves (which they claim will be for the people of Nigeria but only time will tell if that is true).

The militants have zero reason to believe any promises made by BP, Shell or other corporations. They have zero reason to believe any promises made by their own government. They are desperate and rightly so. Violence is going to follow. About the only thing that Shell or BP could do ethically and still retain some hope of getting back into the country later to pump oil at a subsequent time is to abandon ship now and state that the reason is the corruption of the Nigerian government. But that means foregoing all the current oil profits and modern corporations are not structured to give a damn about ethics, just profit. Hence, BP and Shell will be there til they are driven out by force, and then BP and Shell will use political money to buy an existing administration (this one or the next, regardless of party) to rescue them from their self-imposed stupidity.

Thus I agree with Don Sailorman and Oil CEO in this case - it's going to get worse. Yes, those corporations could do something to alleviate the poverty, etc., but they probably won't. Altruism is not in their perceived 90 day bottom line interest, even if it would be in their interest 5 years down the line.

It is indeed unfortunate that oil companies (or any company) feels so desperate to make a profit that they must get in bed with all these corrupt governments.  This just fuels the fires.  Wouldn't it be more favorable for all concerned if the oil companies made the local federal governments share revenue within the oil producting regions using company administered aid programs as part of the conditions for their presense, or would that require that such a revenue sharing law be passed in the companies own corporate home countries???
At this point, any attempt at "regime change" by the United States in Nigeria would be viewed with great suspicion by much of the rest of the world.

It is indeed unfortunate that oil companies (or any company) feels so desperate to make a profit that they must get in bed with all these corrupt governments.

You guys seem to think the problem is corruption at the top, or that "regime change" would bring a better government to power. It is not, and it would not. Government corruption in the form of self-enrichment by senior politicians never held back any country from development -- look at Asia. Also, Nigeria's stability is extremely fragile, and any attempt at "regime change" or similar nonsense would result in an explosion of anomie that would make Iraq look like a picnic. Probably, the country will split up soon, anyway. The only thing preventing it from doing so is that the North wants to stay to enjoy the off-shore oil revenue.

Government corruption in the form of self-enrichment by senior politicians never held back any country from development -- look at Asia.

The key difference between Asia and Central America/Africa/Eastern Europe is that